I believe this is true since lazy relativism seems to have various opinions but its opinions aren't fully educated or smart. They believe that they are always right and thinks that others are wrong.In other words they don't bother to account for themselves.

Like said here, everyone has different perceptions on something. Different ideas and opinions on what is good to achieve and what is not. Not everyone thinks the same about our moral values. Which are a set of principles that guide an individual on how to evaluate the right versus wrong.

This is a great definition of being a strong relativist, One who can take responsibility on their own values, and be able to grow and develop out of them.

What does the word "algorithmic "mean?

I believe that we should correct a person with an explanation on how they are wrong. I know that its their way of thinking or their answer but we should help them have a clear understanding on how their answer on something is wrong without being rude or disrespectful about it. At the end of the day it's up to them on how they take it.

means being present or found everywhere. Being worldwide/ global

I think that the work lame acquiescence's means a "poor agreement" into two persons. That they couldn't hardly agree with each other but had to agree anyways.

Here, he's trying to show us that it's up to us as individuals to believe or take what we want. Everyone has a different way of thinking. What I believe is true someone else might have a different opinion.

I believe that we should preserve into fighting for our values. Why would we just want to loose whats important to us? Our values help us grow and develop. In other words, our decisions we make are a reflection of our own values and beliefs, they always have a purpose, therefore it'll be stupid for us to let them go..

A lazy relativist seems to be person who has many opinions but no educated opinions. They believe they are right and others are wrong; however, they have never bothered to research or substantiate any of their beliefs.

if people don't have any comprehension or any understanding with ethical theory then they will end up in missing a lot when decision making. People wont be able to give a fully explanation when asking what are their beliefs, it'll just be like a game where they will guess when giving out their opinion

Can be people who likes things neat and tidy. Or can also refer in being picky about something. Ones that doesn't provide a clear explanation that appeals.

Everyone who does great in life, who strives to succeed is worthy to win a tiara. We have to keep fighting for what we believe or for what we want in our life. Nobody deserves to win something when they don't want to think about something or deal with it, like a lazy relativist

like said in the beginning of Lazy Relativism, an individual decides on what to believe. People have different opinions and a different way of thinking, therefore a person is obligated to defend their position on something

This is absolutely correct. We have and make our own values because its important to our living and our life. We are the ones who put meaning to it because they are the foundation for our own beliefs We choose the life we lead not the world.

i can strongly agree with this. We as individuals when saying that something is right or wrong or true or false we expect others to have the same answer or think the same way as we do because that's what we believe is right.

Here's the definition on what moral propositions are

I totally agree with this, facts and values are two completely different things, Their meaning is not compared to be the same.

It's the claim that no belief can have justification which guarantees the truth of the belief. In other words, we can have a lot of good reasons to believe that the external world is the way we perceive it to be.