1 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2024
    1. This fanciful scenario is meant to suggest that the place of writing is again in turmoil, roiled now not by the invention of print books but the emergence of electronic literature. Just as the history of print literature is deeply bound up with the evolution of book technology as it built on wave after wave of technical innovations, so the history of electronic literature is entwined with the evolution of digital computers as they shrank from the room-sized IBM 1401 machine on which I first learned to program (sporting all of 4K memory) to the networked machine on my desktop, thousands of times more powerful and able to access massive amounts of information from around the globe. The questions that troubled the Scriptorium are remarkably similar to issues debated today within literary communities. Is electronic literature really literature at all? Will the dissemination mechanisms of the Internet and World Wide Web, by opening publication to everyone, result in a flood of worthless drivel? Is literary quality possible in digital media, or is electronic literature demonstrably inferior to the print canon? What large-scale social and cultural changes are bound up with the spread of digital culture, and what do they portend for the future of writing?

      The piece stands out for its evocative visual style that merges primitive aesthetics with a contemporary sensibility and for its deep historical roots. Its refusal to delineate clearly between character perception and objective reality challenges readers to reconsider the nature of truth within storytelling. In my opinion, Leishman's work is refreshingly original and transformative in the digital literature landscape—it pushes boundaries and invites a level of interaction and immersion that is profoundly thought-provoking and representative of the medium's potential to redefine literary engagement.