original
no, originally, all fluxes are half-hourly. Delete "original".
In addition: please always give time period (years) you show.
original
no, originally, all fluxes are half-hourly. Delete "original".
In addition: please always give time period (years) you show.
tropical
as in any other non-tropical cropland. For the discussion on the 4 permil initiative and all the financial C assets, a map of Europe would be very helpful as well!
Information
many of the comments above by all, to text and figs/tabs, also apply here in the supp
different life times
?? not clear what life time you mean
source
sink/source vs uptake/loss. It is tricky, but we MUST try.
budget
well, many agricultural site PIs do not account for fertilization or harvests either. So we have large uncertainties on the sinks in all ecosystem/land cover types.
looser
compared to ?
sink
no, rephrase
water
vapor. Which years?
Figure
which years?
water
vapor, throughout the mss. We never measure water fluxes!
data
I would give this comparison at least in the suppl
correlation (R2R2R^2)
no, correlation is r, not r2. Since all your values are positive, you give regression results.
R2R2R^2 for th
up to now, you gave correlation coefficients, now you start to give regression coefficients. Why?
2020
2020 or 2021?
Covariance
you "only" model fluxes, not sinks correct? I am asking because above the tropical "sink" was mentioned. At the beginning of the results, you use the term "sink" as well. But: negative NEE/positive NEP shows net CO2 uptake, not necessarily a (long-term) sink, for this you would need all im/exports, even for forests. NEE clearly does NOT equal a sink in agricultural or regularly managed sites. We need to be clearer in our terminology.
between
should be "Among", "between" is only a comparison of 2
i.e.
I only notice it here: i.e. and e.g. need both commas after the their last dot, probably missing throughout the mss
number
turn around the title of the color code by 180 degrees. All axis/legend titles should "look" into the same direction. Good scientific convention to avoid headaches ;-)
was
were
shows
Results in past tense as well ;-)
2020
above you say 2021. What is correct?
rely
check your verb tenses, you switch back and forth. MatMet always in past tense ;-)
BRDF
? abbrev. unknown to me
NDWI
NDVI? really W?
cutouts
how large were these cutouts? Becomes important in small-scale heterogenuous landscapes
was
were
was
were
entire site variables
not clear, entire set of variables (which set, which time, hourly, full years). Needs a bit more detail
TEA
stands for what? Explain abbrev.
objectives
for me, they come too late, after the first result (Fig. 1)
are
keep you verb tense, past tense in the sentence before, no present tense. It is confusing (see above, what is new, what is old)
BASE
for what does this abbreviation stand? Would be good to know.
members
? terminology? members of what?
predictor measurements
term not clear
transpiration
T or ET?
water
it is actually water vapor, not water