4 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2025
    1. By the laws of New Hampshire, collected and finally passed in 1815, no one was permitted to be enrolled in the militia of the State, but free white citizens; and the same provision is found in a subsequent collection of the laws, made in 1855. Nothing could more strongly mark the entire repudiation of the African race.

      According to New Hampshire laws finalized in 1815, only free white citizens were allowed to join the state militia. This same rule still appeared in the state’s laws as late as 1855. This clearly shows how completely the African American race was rejected and excluded from full participation in society.

    2. It is very true, that in that portion of the Union where the labor of the negro race was found to be unsuited to the climate and unprofitable to the master, but few slaves were held at the time of the Declaration of Independence; and when the Constitution was adopted, it had entirely worn out in one of them, and measures had been taken for its gradual abolition in several others. But this change had not been produced by any change of opinion in relation to this race; but because it was discovered, from experience, that slave labor was unsuited to the climate and productions of these States: for some of the States, where it had ceased or nearly ceased to exist, were actively engaged in the slave trade, procuring cargoes on the coast of Africa, and transporting them for sale to those parts of the Union where their labor was found to be profitable, and suited to the climate and productions. And this traffic was openly carried on, and fortunes accumulated by it, without reproach from the people of the States where they resided. And it can hardly be supposed that, in the States where it was then countenanced in its worst form—that is, in the seizure and transportation—the people could have regarded those who were emancipated as entitled to equal rights with themselves.

      The logic and language of this passage reflect deeply racist views and historical justifications for oppression. This passage argues that even in the Northern states where slavery had ended this shift was based on economic factors not a moral revaluation of Black humanity.

    3. If the question raised by it is legally before us, and the court should be of opinion that the facts stated in it disqualify the plaintiff from becoming a citizen, in the sense in which that word is used in the Constitution of the United States, then the judgment of the Circuit Court is erroneous, and must be reversed

      This sentence is saying If the court has the authority to consider the issue and it finds that the plaintiff is not constitutionally considered a citizen then the lower court's ruling was incorrect and must be overturned.

    4. The declaration is in the form usually adopted in that State to try questions of this description, and contains the averment necessary to give the court jurisdiction; that he and the defendant are citizens of different States; that is, that he is a citizen of Missouri, and the defendant a citizen of New York.

      This sentence is explaining that the legal complaint or declaration follows standard format and includes a required statement that the plaintiff and defendant are from different states which is crucial for the federal court to have jurisdiction over the case.