I like to being able to see these differences in views on how to deal with procrastination. I can only imagine how different it is for various people and how they come to deal with it. I can even imagine the number of people who actually do research on it vs those who just live with it.

Procrastination is something I have always wanted others opinion about and to read about how philosophers have delve into it, a sort of "been there done that" is refreshing to know. I really enjoy philosophy and the different avenues that you can go off of just one subject.

Going through this reading, it is great to know that I am not the only one. It is always a good feeling to know you are not alone in certain situations. Its not enough to just procrastinate, but then to have anxiety about doing it.

I like conclusions, seeing how to repeat and summarize the wording already used to explain the points of the work. Reformulation is used in this last paragraph to sum up everything that the reader has processed so far and to process it once more.

This is geared toward the beginning of the statement. Used for showing how those in the academia field procrastinate because of lengths of studying, etc. It guides the reader through another type of group that relates to "putting things off".

This was an opposition to Akerlof wanting to send the box off, it becomes specific enough to describe the contrast in his thinking by highlighting a paper he wrote on procrastination. Even though we know we should, still we push the task to another day.

We are being showed this everyday, how new tech becomes normalized and almost easily accepted by the masses. This shines a light on writing and how going from pen and paper to a screen.

I have had this discussion before on whether or not calculators make it easier to find calculations but more lax on the actual calculating. This speaks volumes to certain tech that can make things faster, but may take away from the steps to do it.

I can see both sides of the coin for this term/group and it's opposition. Protesting against new technology while embracing other technology.

When looking at both versions, I believe this is an a great way to think deeper about what Plato and Socrates were saying because this sentence makes me think about the game telephone and how easy it was back then to distort a story or conversation

As one who enjoys philosophy, this makes sense! In a sense when one writes at some points the focus goes to technical and analytical instead of the details of the idea.

Reading this now I can say that a thesis was one of my weaker points in the beginning. I could come up with the entire paper, but summing up why, aww man lol.

This line sums up where people start on their journey, but not just where they start, how they finish, how they get stuck. I just liked the sentence when I read it because of its simplicity to how ideas are transferred to paper.

I think this is a very detailed and good way of explaining a process on how to view writing in any style.

It truly is!! https://images.app.goo.gl/9mLBX6x3zjzAAxRc7 I believe mostly because of perfection that is placed on how good everybody else may think it is.

Sometimes I feel as though research is portrayed to be the easiest step or the step that comes first. Between these two articles, there isn't much depth on how to research.

As I was reading, I literally had this question going through my mind. Should I do both?

Just the idea of getting UNSTUCK gets me to want to read more of what this author has to say about writing. It makes me want to read the book that was offered. This is one of the differences between this article and the other one. The one by Steven Mintz is well written and helps with certain issues, but some of those points don't focus on writers block as much as this one does in my opinion.

I love how this is repeated. The writing process as an idea is easier than the actual writing because when it gets to that point now I'm putting constraints on my ideas because I am writing. I notice I tend to do this.

THIS!!! I love this because speaking specifically, we all as humans, still have some of our inner child in us. To see that others begin their writing with "blah" in a sense helps with the process.

I appreciate that even though he doesn't work with writers of fiction, he doesn't hold a prejudice against fiction writers. Even using a fictional writer as his example for the article.