he creators of Beauty AI expressed dismay at the fact that “the robotsdid not like people with dark skin.”
This makes me think about a movie coded bias, where the facial recognition technology is coded with biases for white skin people. Who gets to code and what do they code in technology? What is their position to decided good or bad in a technology?
th the rest of AI, the dangers of ChatGPT go far deeper than biasand discrimination
in my opinion, we as a designer have the vision and perspective to look at the criticalities of such technologies, but this also makes me think why people are crazy to pursue career in machine learning, deep learning and Ai. Is it because the minimum qualifications are not set to learn Ai leads to such innovation and coding of chatbots, that the ethics which a designer looks at go missing?
There is a voice, but it is mechanical. It does not incite, offend orseduce.
If chatgpt is empowered to answer users' queries or questions, then why did Microsoft Chatgpt act so weirdly in a recent incident reported 7 days ago? link :- https://english.jagran.com/technology/want-to-be-alive-independent-chatgpt-response-to-journos-queries-raises-eyebrows-10065503. It further makes me think that if we do not control these innovations I wonder, it might lead to human conflicts over political, social, and socio-economic issues or otherwise. Is it again a competition to innovate the best version of humanoid computers which should replace humans?