25 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2024
    1. A significant determinant of the outcome of a tennis game is an individual’s physical fitness, which can be influenced by their hydration and nutritional status (Lees, 2003). Therefore, knowledge of proper nutritional techniques and hydration (e.g. the timing of the consumption of different nutrients, adequate and precise hydration, adequate NS etc.) can positively affect a player’s ability to train, play and recover from exercise. It increases the overall physical but also psychological capacities of athletes, which logically keeps them away from potential doping usage. It is directly supported in our results which evidenced lower likelihood of future doping behavior among those athletes who scored higher for KSN

      It is true that players are looking for anyway to gain an advantage over other players. This may incline them to take supplements with the promise of gaining what they consider a large advantage that may be new or faulty.

    2. Males are more susceptible to potential doping behavior than females. In general, such findings are expected since it is known that female athletes are less oriented to substance misuse (including doping) than their male peers

      Males are more targeted in the field of drug misuse.

    3. 5 11.6 2 9.5 Coach 24 55.8 12 57.1 Formal education (school, professional seminars. etc.) 14 32.6 5 23.8

      Few players rely on their own knowledge and instead trust coaches and physical trainers.

    4. The world of tennis is very concerned about the problem of doping in the sport. Concern has grown even stronger since 1988 when tennis was re-included in the Olympic Games program, but to the best of our knowledge only one study investigated the problem of doping in tennis,

      Good claim of why my topic might be relevant to readers and why I am asking the question in the first place.

    5. When all factors, including NS, fail to provide the result athletes are striving for, the temptation to start doping emerges

      This quote provides a good background on why some players may be inclined to dope rather than using conventional methods to improve health and performance.

    1. However, manyminerals and vitamins that were available on the ATP tour haveactually been tested, and the true source has never beenconfirmed.

      Obscure that the ATP would not vet the substances they give out to players. Also it is strange that the ATP waived Rusedski but not the Australian Open Commute.

    2. The sanctions for dopinginfractions, laid down in the World Anti-DopingCode, allow for mitigating circumstances to lowerthe standard 2-year ban.

      Lower but not waive

    3. of BohdanUlihrach and Greg Rusedski, who tested positivefor nandrolone or nandrolone prohormones in2002 and 2003, respectively. In June 2007,Guillermo Coria sued an American nutritionalcompany for the financial damages he sufferedduring his 2-year suspension after also testingpositive for nandrolone in 2001.

      This reflects a lot of similar cases that have happened now in tennis. This signifies that the problem hasn't gotten better significantly.

    1. The 24-year-old hitter who recently took part in Australia's ATP Cup tournament last week, was found by the World Anti-Doping Agency to have the banned substances Ligandrol and Stanozolol in his system after submitting a urine sample following a Davis Cup match in November.

      It is important to note that Jarry was issued an 11 month suspension due to this case.

    2. "As stated by the Colombian Olympic Committee in 2018, this substance is found frequently in Colombian meat and may affect athletes' test results."

      The steriod is common in Columbian meat giving credit to Farah's claim of contamination.

    3. International Tennis Federation (ITF)

      ITF is different than the ATP this is important to note. Also, grand slams like the Australian Open are not a part of the ATP tour.

    4. But despite the adverse findings, the 32-year-old Wimbledon and U.S. Open doubles winner explained on social media that his failed drug test is the result of eating contaminated meat from his home country.

      Farah used a similar excuse to reduce the drug claim as other top players, but he was still not allowed to play in the Australian Open, an event he was in contention to win. As a result of the ban, he lost the opportunity to win thousands or even millions of dollars.

    1. test results have not occurred at theGrand Slam events15, which are administered by a separate organisation16, but onlyat events administered by the ATP.

      This is very interesting. It seems to prove the validity of my question. Why does the ATP specifically always find themselves in drama regarding drugs and punishment.

    2. Player is responsible forany Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites orMarkers found to be present in his Specimen.

      This would suggest that both Sinner and Rusedski should've been punished.

    3. The tribunal, selected by the ATP, rounded on thegoverning body for not having talked to Rusedski aboutits decision to withdraw the salt tablets from distribution inMay 2003 – although messages were posted on lockerroom walls and printed in the player’s weekly newsletterfor three months

      Holes can be found in Rusedski's argument since the ATP board did try to tell players that the tablets had been recalled. It would be interesting to see if a lower ranked opponent would've avoided a ban in the same way. It also brings up a point if being negligent to a recall is a personal fault and the fault of the ATP.

    4. His defence rested on the fact that seven other samples fromplayers, collected by the ATP had had positive readings and a further 36 had whatwere deemed to be elevated, but not positive levels,

      Defense is similar to Sinners. Shifting blame form themselves onto someone else or another organization. Weather its true or not both players both blamed others for putting drugs in their systems.

    5. Rusedski tested positive in July 2003 with a reading of 5 nanograms permillilitre of urine,

      This was roughly the same amount of drugs they found during Sinner's tests.

    1. Canada's Denis Shapovalov said: “Can’t imagine what every other player that got banned for contaminated substances is feeling right now.”

      Important to reflect on cases where players were given bans for similar cases.

    2. Former Wimbledon finalist Nick Kyrgios of Australia named it “ridiculous – whether it was accidental or planned" on X. "You get tested twice with a banned (steroid) substance ... you should be gone for 2 years. Your performance was enhanced.”

      A former pro player claims being tested for the drug should in nature result in a ban. This perspective is shared by other players and viewers.

    3. ‘An anabolic steroid spray for wound treatment - ridiculous. Other substances such as antibiotics are more important for wounds. I suspect this spray is being marketed specifically for high-performance sport through unofficial channels and on the internet," Sörgel said.

      The treatment of the wound was weird in nature. There is suspicion that physios were trying to get the steroids' into him on purpose whether he was aware of it or not.

    4. He called for a line to be drawn because athletes have bee cleared "on the basis of similar excuses" and that "it will go on and on" if no firm action is taken.

      Other athletes have made similar claims and the line gets pushed father and further back until there is almost no penalty for doping. Sinner case could be used as am example to show how the line is getting pushed back.

    5. ‘If someone tests positive for clostebol, they are automatically banned. The sequence after a positive test that is disputed is to go to the National Anti-Doping Agency, to WADA, to CAS. Why can Sinner then be acquitted by a court?" Sörgel said.

      Proves the point that other athletes were treated unfairly compared to Sinner.

    6. The ITIA absolved Sinner of fault and negligence as it accepted his explanation that the substance had accidentally entered his system via a product his physiotherapist had used to treat a small wound.

      This speaks to issue of the ITIA. Sinner was believed to have had no part in steroids entering his system. There have been other cases in the past where players have claimed this same thing but were issued a heavy penalty. Sinner might have gotten special treatment because he is world number one.