37 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
  2. Feb 2019
    1. Even the more expressive forms of design are about solving aesthetic problems

      I think it doesn't have to be this way, but this is how society sees designers for sure. Maybe their opinion would be different if they knew something about Don Norman

    2. 1BEYoNDRADICALDESIgN? 1. BEYOnD RADICAL DEsIGn?Dreams are powerful. They are repositories of our desire. They animate the entertainment industry and drive consumption. They can blind people to reality and provide cover for political horror. But they can also inspire us to imagine that things could be radically different than they are today, and then believe we can progress toward that imaginary world.

      First words about dreams

    3. viiPREFACEA/B, Dunne & Raby.AAffirmativeProblem solvingProvides answersDesign for productionDesign as solutionIn the service of industryFictional functionsFor how the world isChange the world to suit usScience fictionFuturesThe “real” realNarratives of productionApplicationsFunInnovationConcept designConsumerMakes us buyErgonomicsUser-friendlinessProcessBCriticalProblem findingAsks questionsDesign for debateDesign as mediumIn the service of societyFunctional fictionsFor how the world could beChange us to suit the worldSocial fictionParallel worldsThe “unreal” realNarratives of consumptionImplicationsHumorProvocationConceptual designCitizenMakes us thinkRhetoricEthicsAuthorship

      This whole poem I can tell is already getting at some of the more major concepts in the article.

  3. Jan 2019
    1. How Beauty Is Making Scientists Rethink Evolution

      Decided I'm going to try for a biological subject matter, I am not sure exactly what, but this article interested me

    2. Maybe we were captivated by their consonance of color, form and aroma.

      This actually makes me think like what even is art and does this have something to do with it...

    3. The philosopher Denis Dutton has argued that people around the world have an intrinsic appreciation for a certain type of landscape — a grassy field with copses of trees, water and wildlife — because it resembles the Pleistocene savannas where humans evolved. In a TED Talk, Dutton explains that postcards, calendars and paintings depicting this universally beloved landscape usually include trees that fork near the ground because our ancestors relied on their conveniently low branches to scramble away from predators.

      Pretty sure I heard a NPR segment about this exact subject

    4. Why are flowers beautiful? Or, more precisely: Why are flowers beautiful to us?

      That's true, it serves us no purpose (I mean, in this phase of evolution in humans)

    5. Rather, evolution is an intricate clockwork of physics, biology and perception in which every moving part influences another in both subtle and profound ways. Its gears are so innumerable and dynamic — so susceptible to serendipity and mishap — that even a single outcome of its ceaseless ticking can confound science for centuries

      If it's really this complicated, then it would be very difficult indeed to perform tests on these theories, because there are so many different variables involved.

    6. Tellingly, Prum and Ryan do not discuss each other’s work in their recent books.

      Yes and it is obvious they disagree. I am not really sure who to believe. Being someone that has studied biology solely in high school, I cannot say I have hardly any experience with species that have for whatever reason evolved extremely bizzare traits that have no apparent use. However, I think it's important to note that birds do take up nearly all of Prum's study and it is true that birds can have some of the most insanely diverse physical characteristics, definitely more than any othe class of animals I know.

    7. not because they were more suitable mates, but simply because they were more noticeable.

      Well I suppose getting attention by sticking out is something that works

    8. namely that natural and sexual selection are distinct processes and that, in at least some cases, beauty reveals nothing about an individual’s health or vigor.

      Yes and this is very very believable in the case of the club winged manakin. I looked it up, the bones look pretty horrible for aerodynamics and weight.

    9. “Birds are beautiful because they are beautiful to themselves.”

      As evidenced by the fact that presented with a mirror, any bird will come up with an impressive and maybe obnoxious song about how stunningly gorgeous they are.

    10. Over time, this genetic correlation would reach a tipping point, creating a runaway cycle that would greatly exaggerate both preference and trait, glorifying beauty at the expense of the male’s survival.

      That would make sense yeah

    11. About two hours into our walk,

      Interestingly this became more of an anecdote about Prum than an interview within this research related article. I suppose it makes it more captivating

    12. Again and again, he told me, he has asked other researchers for feedback and received either excuses of busyness or no reply at all.

      It's funny that this is what most of the scientific community does to him. Not like ha ha funny, like huh. okay. Reminds me of some people I have known.

    13. Beauty, therefore, would not confound natural selection — it would be very much a part of it.

      So if I am getting this, the author is saying that it's surprising beauty is important to natural selection? I don't think so. There's still plenty of evidence that beauty in humans works similarly to this, although for the most part probably subconsciously. And if beauty is important then wouldn't beautiful animals ave beautiful children? And even if burdensome ornaments aren't practical from a utilitarian, standpoint, they still carry weight in the beauty category.

    14. Not only do the bowerbird’s colorful feathers and elaborate constructions lack obvious value outside courtship, but they also hinder his survival and general well-being, draining precious calories and making him much more noticeable to predators.

      Yes but isn't courtship quite important for animals? Isn't that how things are naturally selected?

    1. Colleges could just report letter grades without pluses and minuses, so that any G.P.A. above a 3.7 appears on transcripts as an A.

      Here's another idea, which is part of the French system of learning. Not sure if it's better, but you get usually something out of 20 points, and if it's higher than halfway then you should be very happy with yourself. Then again this could become discouraging?

    2. Really, no one cares.

      Also not the first time I have heard this from an adult. It seems that 10 years after graduation, even where you went to college doesn't matter. All that does is work experience.

    3. If your goal is to graduate without a blemish on your transcript, you end up taking easier classes and staying within your comfort zone. If you’re willing to tolerate the occasional B, you can learn to program in Python while struggling to decipher “Finnegans Wake.”

      This is a more reasonable argument that the author is putting out. Not that you should be getting all C's in your classes, but that you should be taking some that will inevitably make you struggle. (If it's what interests you)

    4. They paid attention to their curiosity and prioritized activities that they found intrinsically motivating — which ultimately served them well in their careers.

      This is something that I have been guilty of, but more recently have been ignoring more often. I think there is something to be said about persevering through less interesting things. Not too often, but often enough to make the interesting stuff more interesting.