leasing rights
I'm not sure students have the background to know that these are.
leasing rights
I'm not sure students have the background to know that these are.
When Transfers are Fraud?
Very interesting for students!
An expenditure
I wonder if you should explain the bases of accounting sometime earlier in the chapter.
fund
add "the" before "fund"
few
should this be "fewer"?
Improvement
Should you add "for" before the "Street Improvement"?
the
add "to" before "the"
A government’s Statement of Activities presents much of the same information we see on the income statement for a for-profit or non-profit.
I wonder whether or not there needs to be more sub-sections and titles in this chapter. Clearly, this sentence is signaling to the reader that a new concept is going taught, but it would be easier for the reader to know this by a subsection with a new title.
going concern
I recommend explaining or defining this concept.
2015
Should this be 2016 instead?
Assets + Deferred Outflows = Liabilities + Deferred Inflows + Net Position
Maybe include the original equation before showing this updated equation?
cover
add "to" before "cover"
has
delete "has"
deferred inflow of resources
Is there a reason why you disclosure DIR before DOR?
finances.
Maybe list these with bullet points and then explain them in more detail latter on?
That increase
Be specific about "that increase". Is it "total spending" or "depreciation expense"?
qualitative
maybe replace this with "significant"
80% a
replace this with "80% is a..."
They’re just not sexy
Delete this or replace it.
We see a reconciliation that added back $750,000 to net assets. Practically speaking, this means Treehouse collected on a large receivable in FY14 that did not appear in FY15. This raises a natural question: Was FY14 an outlier year with respect to receivables and cash flow? If it was, then an important second conclusion is that Treehouse’s basic operations consistently use more cash than they produce, so it depends on positive cash flow from investing and financing activities. That’s not a weakness, per se, but it does change how we think about Treehouse’s operational and financial strategy.
But wouldn't there still be a positive value ($500,000ish) for cash flow from operating if you take out the Cy pres award?
Returning to Treehouse
Refer to the particular table you want the reader to look at. This is another example of why table and figure numbers would be helpful.
Here
What are you referring to?
Of course, this can’t go on forever. At some point Treehouse will need to pay off those payables. When they do that liability will decrease, but so will cash. That’s why when liabilities decrease, we see a reconciliation that also decreases net assets.
Add this paragraph to the end of the previous paragraph.
Strange as it sounds, by committing to a future cash outflow, Treehouse has produced cash it can use today. That’s why increasing a liability leads to a reconciliation that adds back to net assets.
Great explanation!
acycess
delete this and replace it with "access".
related to that store’s operations.
delete this, and replace it with something like this... "because it sold a particular product to a customer in it's store."
flow
Should "flow" be deleted here?
Most assets will increase if cash decreases. If we purchase inventory with cash, for instance, inventory will increase and cash will decrease. It follows that decreasing an asset will almost always bring about an increase in cash. For example, if we sell marketable securities or collect on accounts receivable, those assets will decrease but cash will increase.
Do you think a graphic or figure could be added to show this relationship? For example, there could be graphic that shows the example of inventory explained in the highlighted passage.
unrealized losses on investments
Should this concept be italicized? Should you add an example of an unrealized loss on investments. For example, the current stockpile of crude oil owned by the U.S. The value of crude oil was dropped significantly, but the U.S. government has not sold the crude oil (therefore it is an unrealized loss).
Activity that would otherwise decrease net assets is shown here as an increase because we’re “adding back” those decreases to arrive at net cash flows from operations. Activity that would otherwise increase net assets is shown as a reduction (in parentheses) because we’re “backing out” those increases to arrive at net cash flows from operations.
The current explanation is not going to be obvious for students.
$199,299
Should there be a negative sign before this number?
It might see negative cash flow from investing activities if it moves a lot of its idle cash into short-term investments. In the future we expect those investments to produce positive cash flow, but in the first year or two they might look like only a cash outflow. You need to look at all these year-to-year cash flows when looking at cash flows from investing activities.
This is unclear. I recommend providing an example, or maybe just delete this.
spent
add "to" after "spent"
are
delete
Total expenses grew by 14.5% from FY2014 to FY2015, a growth rate slightly slower than the growth rate for revenues. Also note that all of the expenses are reported as unrestricted, hence why we reclassify revenues as “Net assets released from restrictions”.
This is unclear.
In reviewing financial statements
I don't see where you explain why some of the values in the table below in parentheses. If you do, please ignore this comment.
These releases do not indicate new revenues, but rather a re-classification across the different types of net asset restrictions.
It would be helpful if you provide an example of this. For example, when would this happen?
In general, the row called "net assets released from restriction" needs a lot more explanation. Why is there negative values for temp restricted and permanently restricted, and positive for unrestricted. I know, but the student will not.
It
Lastly, it reports...
reports
also reports
in-kind contributions
Define this concept.
Earned revenue
Define this concept.
That’s why profitability is one of many criteria we need to apply when thinking about the finances of a public organization.
If this is the main point, state this earlier in this section.
are the
delete
Fair Value vs. Historical Cost
Should you include the concept called "mark to market" here?
see below
Should this say "see above"?
Book Value vs. Market Value
Very useful reference.
less liquid
are less liquid
Cash equivalents
I'm glad to see this is defined here.
reducing
delete "reducing". Then, add a sentence like "The most liquid assets appear first and the least liquid assets appear near the bottom".
look
Let's look at an example.
How much does the organization report in buildings and equipment?
This is a confusing sentence.
receivables
Before receivables, add "of total"
this sort
delete this.
accrual basis
define this concept.
looks and feels a bit different
change this to: "each statement's presentation style and terminology can vary..."
We also have to think about the restrictions on net assets. Net assets are reported as either unrestricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets or permanently restricted net assets. Unrestricted net assets have no donor-imposed stipulations but may include internal or board-designated restrictions. Temporarily restricted net assets represent assets with time and/or purpose restrictions stipulated by a donor. Permanently restricted net asset represent assets with donor restrictions that do not expire. We are therefore interested in whether the growth in an organization’s capacity is limited to donor-funded programs (i.e., temporarily or permanently net assets) or whether the growth is in its unrestricted position.
Broaden this explanation for the public sector.
Public organizations don’t have “owners.” Instead, they have stakeholders, or anyone who has an interest, financial or otherwise, in how well the organization achieves its mission. For governments, taxpayers are a rough analog to owners. But unlike investors in a for-profit company, taxpayers don’t have a legal claim to the government’s assets. Taxpayers’ main interest is that the government delivers the services they expect it to deliver. Donors and funders who give money to a non-profit organization care about its financial health, but they also don’t expect to get their money back if the organization fails. Mostly, they care that the organization will continue to serve its clients and the community at large. For these reasons, net assets are an important part of a government and non-profit finances, but they don’t have quite the same meaning as owners’ equity for a for-profit entity.
Outstanding explanation! I have to address this question for students every semester. This will be a helpful reference for students.
Assets = Liabilities + Net Assets
It would be useful to have a table or graphic that lists the various assets, liabilities, and net assets. This would be a hopeful reference and useful for students. It would also help the reader follow the following paragraphs when the authors explain the various types of assets, liabilities, and net assets.
How are Budgeting and Accounting Different?
I'm wondering if the tables and figures should be numbered. It would make it easier for the reader to follow.
That’s why budget-makers and accountants often don’t see eye-to-eye. In fact, in many large public organizations, they work side-by-side but don’t talk.
I would recommend you delete this. I don't think there's enough information here for students to understand this point. Most students aren't going to understand that the accountant and budget makers are not the same people.
These are known as principles of accounting recognition.
This is a confusing sentence.
But sometimes we want an “apples-to-apples” comparison. Sometimes we want to know if an organization’s mission-money nexus is the same, or different, from similar organizations. Sometimes we want to know how efficiently an organization accomplishes its mission compared to its peers. Sometimes we want to know if an organization is in comparatively good or bad financial health. To answer these types of question you need information found only in financial statements. In this chapter, we walk through the basic financial statements that most public organizations prepare, and the essential concepts from accounting you’ll need understand the numbers that appear in those statements. Moreover, we may need to compare an organization’s finances to the finances of other organizations. If our organization’s expenses exceeded its revenues we might consider that to be a failure. Unless, of course, we see that all organizations like it also struggled. If it failed to invest in its capital equipment, we might think it was neglecting its own service delivery capacity, unless we saw other organizations make that same trade-off. These types of comparisons demand financial information that’s based on standardized financial information from a broadly-shared set of assumptions. Budgets are rarely standardized that way. Fortunately, we can get that information from an organization’s financial statements.
Too much repetition here. The main point could be explained and motivated in one paragraph.
On
Strong introduction! This clearly motivates the topic.
2
As a read this chapter, I thought about how I would assign this chapter to students. Specifically, I thought about whether or not I would assign this entire chapter to the student for a particular lecture. I doubt I would. Therefore, I wonder if this chapter should be split into three chapters: (1) fundamental for reading BFSs (2) ratio analysis (3) practice problems.
2
Do you have a glossary page for each chapter? If not, you should consider it, especially since there are many terms and concepts used in this chapter.