is this a correct word to use? what are you trying to say?

the other way. To test performance, we designed three distinct...

esto tb suena a metodologia

Si entiendo bien ,estas testeando el modelo publicado en tu paper anterior con estos datos no? entiendo que el formato de esta revista tiene la metodologia al final, es por eso que empiezas con un modo resumen de la metodologia en tus resultados? (este primer parrafo?

To evaluate our quantitative framework, we test three aspects: its consistency, descriptive fidelity, and application" (which I dont know what do you mean by application) also maybe this whole sentence can be remove and start from: We first tested...Second, we ..... finally, we .....

measure? method? window is to cryptic I think

I dont know if this is a good word. but maybe it is in this field...I am not sure. I just think is overused and not technical

that a change occurred in...

I think you can remove this, is evident that the sophisticated signals come from the limitations established in the previous parragraph. Also are they more "sophisticated" or they are more accurate? or maybe use a more technical statistical word?

Esa palabrilla otra veeeez. aunque quizas aqui podrias dejarla porque eres explicito a lo que te estas refiriendo (discretize and summarize approach"

rewrite your AI sophisticated generated stuff hehe because it get more complicated to read than useful. maybe this: "Consequently, it is impossible to distinguish between a resiliant individual who exhib....and a vulnerable one whose..."

also, "sluggish" is this a scientific word in this field?

notaras que en gran parte de tus parrafos mucho empiezan con THIS. En scientific writting, esto debe o eliminarse por completo o usarlo el minimo posible (muchos autores recomiendan eliminarlo, es decir, nunca comenzar una frase con THIS. En vez de eso, ser explicito respecto a lo que te refieres, por ejemplo aqui, la frase comenzaria: "An stationary assumption like this, is not a minor statistical..." recuerda que, sobretodo cuando diste varios puntos en tu parrafo anterior, el lector no tiene tiempo de ver a que te refieres del parrafo anterio con THIS", sobretodo si el parrago anterior..tambien empezo con THIS! jaja

maybe "lean on a stationary assumption"

go through out the text and try to avoid as much as possible these "amplyfying adjectives" (profound, invaluable, etc) the excesive use is not needed.

really? nowhere?

such as...

windowed is also weird, you are here contrastinc with more frequentist methods right?

I am curious what do you mean by unified. Unifying what? it may come later on the rext but is an interesting choice of word, do you mean that before this there was several methods to do non-stationary HRV analyses ? and now you can only use your method to answer several research questions associated to this type of data?

distort how?

Comentario general: Palabras como "cornerstone" o "hampered" (que esta inmediatamente en la frase que viene) son palabras que te acusan del uso de AI en la generación del texto. Vas a tener que ser cuidadoso con eso, porque basado en la experiencia de Caroline, parece que Nature communication es super peaky o estricto en la generación de texto con AI (te recomiendo averiguar).