34 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Of note, our study is the only study to date which has analysed the difference of the brain network between Vipassana meditators and controls during the resting state and using source-level magnetoencephalography.

      What steps could future research take to ensure these findings are more conclusive, and could additional longitudinal studies help?

    2. Importantly, after FDR correction, our results showed that the right hippocampus displays a higher degree in the theta band with respect to controls.

      Could the role of the right hippocampus in prospective memory be a key factor in how meditation impacts cognitive functions?

    3. Based on a MRI template, the volume conduction model proposed by Nolte [39] was considered and the Linearly

      Are the anatomical templates used in MEG source reconstruction robust enough to capture individual variations in meditators' brain structures?

    4. The MEG system was developed by the National Research Council, Pozzuoli, Naples, at the Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems “E. Caianiello.” The system is equipped with 163 magnetometers, including 9 reference sensors that are located further away from the helmet [31]

      How does MEG's temporal resolution compare to fMRI in identifying neuroplasticity changes from meditation?

    5. mean years of meditation experience 6.41 (±SE 1.4)

      Could the variance in years of meditation experience among participants influence the results, and how is this controlled?

    6. scientific studies have begun to focus on one of the main open awareness or mindfulness meditations,

      Does this study distinguish between the neural effects of mindfulness meditation and focused-attention meditation, or is it treating all types similarly?

    1. The scalp map shows electrode sites where this three-way interaction was significant between 420 and 440ms.

      What tools or neuroimaging methods are best suited for tracking these connectivity changes in future research? Should I mention the limitations of current technology in my paper?

    2. The developmental of new methods to probe different aspects of connectivity (both structural and functional) will be extremely valuable in furthering this line of inquiry.

      Could focused-attention meditation be used as a tool to enhance learning or recovery in individuals with cognitive impairments? Should this angle be incorporated into my research?

    3. illustrates

      Can I find other studies that explore the link between meditation practices and enhanced cognitive flexibility or attentional control?

    4. The attentional blink phenomenon

      Should I expand my research to include cognitive flexibility as a specific outcome of neuroplasticity through focused-attention meditation?

    5. Another study [5] recently examined the idea that OM meditation decreases elaborative stimulus processing in a longitudinal study using scalp-recorded brain potentials and performance in an attentional blink task. The consequence of decreased elaborative stimulus processing is that the subject is able to better attend moment-to-moment to the stream of stimuli to which they are exposed and less likely to “get stuck” on any one stimulus

      The reduction of the attentional blink after OM meditation suggests that meditation can improve the brain’s ability to engage and disengage from stimuli. This finding introduces a new angle on how meditation can train cognitive flexibility, which is crucial for neuroplasticity.

    6. The findings support the idea that, after extensive FA meditation training, minimal effort is necessary to sustain attentional focus.

      How can I incorporate this finding into my research question—should I compare neuroplastic changes at different stages of meditation (novice vs. expert)?

    7. This inverted u-shaped function resembles the learning curve associated with skill acquisition in other domains of expertise, such as language acquisition.

      Does the reduction in brain activation at advanced stages imply that long-term practitioners experience deeper neuroplastic changes than novices, or does it suggest that the brain becomes more efficient with less effort?

    8. the mental training of meditation is fundamentally no different than other forms of skill acquisition that can induce plastic changes in the brain

      If neuroplasticity through meditation is similar to other skill acquisitions, could the underlying neural mechanisms (e.g., the formation of new synaptic connections) overlap with non-meditative cognitive training methods?

    9. Here we focus on Focused Attention (FA) meditation and Open Monitoring (OM) meditation.

      How do the effects of Focused Attention (FA) meditation differ from Open Monitoring (OM) meditation in terms of brain plasticity? Should I narrow my research to one type, or explore both for comparison?

  2. Oct 2024
    1. The paired t-test within the MBSR group identified a small cluster in the left hippocampus with increased gray matter concentration

      Meditation appears to enhance the hippocampus, associated with learning and memory.

    2. MBSR participants reported spending an average 22.6 hours (SD: 6.3 hours) engaged in formal homework exercises over the 8-week course (average = 27 minutes per day)

      Consistent daily practice may be critical for observing neuroplastic changes.

    3. Anatomical MRI images from sixteen healthy, meditation-naïve participants were obtained before and after they underwent the eight-week program.

      The use of meditation-naïve participants and a control group strengthens the study's validity.

    4. Changes in gray matter concentration were investigated using voxel-based morphometry.

      This study uses advanced imaging techniques to explore meditation's impact on brain structure over time."

    5. Cross-sectional studies have established that differences in regional gray matter are associated with performance abilities (Mechelli et al., 2004; Milad et al., 2005), suggesting that an increase in gray matter corresponds to improved functioning in the relevant area. Studies of experienced meditators have also suggested the possibility of structural plasticity, but their cross-sectional designs did not exclude the possibility of pre-existing group differences, precluding causal conclusions.

      Longitudinal studies are needed to determine if meditation causes structural brain changes.

    6. Recently, several cross-sectional anatomical MRI studies have demonstrated that experienced meditators exhibit a different gray matter morphometry in multiple brain regions when compared to non-meditating individuals

      Prior research suggests meditation may alter brain anatomy, hinting at neuroplastic changes.

    7. Therapeutic interventions that incorporate training in mindfulness meditation have become increasingly popular, but to date, little is known about neural mechanisms associated with these interventions.

      There is a gap in understanding how mindfulness meditation affects brain structure and function.

    8. Mindfulness meditation has been reported to produce positive effects on psychological well-being that extend beyond the time the individual is formally meditating. Over the last three decades mindfulness meditation practices have been increasingly incorporated into psychotherapeutic programs, to take advantage of these benefits (cf., Baer, 2003; Grossman et al., 2004).

      Mindfulness meditation is increasingly used in therapy due to its lasting positive effects on mental health.

    9. The results suggest that participation in MBSR is associated with changes in gray matter concentration in brain regions involved in learning and memory processes, emotion regulation, self-referential processing, and perspective taking.

      This study provides evidence that mindfulness meditation can lead to structural changes in the brain, supporting the concept of meditation-induced neuroplasticity.

    1. IBMT involves learning that requires experience and explicit instruction. To ensure appropriate experience, coaches (qualified instructors) are trained to help novices practice IBMT properly. Instructors received training on how to interact with experimental and control groups to make sure they understand the training program exactly.

      I would be interested to see if traditional focused meditation would have similar results.

    2. Although no direct measures of brain changes were used in this study, some previous studies suggest that changes in brain networks can occur. Thomas et al. (40) showed that, in rats, one short experience of acute exposure to psychosocial stress reduced both short- and long-term survival of newborn hippocampal neurons. Similarly, the human brain is sensitive to short experience. Naccache et al. (41) showed that the subliminal presentation of emotional words (<100 ms) modulates the activity of the amygdala at a long latency and triggers long-lasting cerebral processes (41).

      Let's review these other studies as well.

    3. However, the lengthy training required has made it difficult to use random assignment of participants to conditions to confirm these findings.

      Interesting.

    4. shows significantly better attention and control of stress

      How is this measured? Edit: Addressed further down.

    5. a group

      What is the size and composition of the group? Edit: Addressed further down.

    6. showed greater improvement

      Is this quantified?

    7. may be easier to teach to novices because they would not have to struggle so hard to control their thoughts.

      Very interesting. I thought the whole purpose of meditation WAS the struggle to control the thoughts. I thought that is where the benefits came from.

    8. Thought control is achieved gradually through posture and relaxation, body–mind harmony, and balance with the help of the coach rather than by making the trainee attempt an internal struggle to control thoughts in accordance with instruction.

      Certainly would make it more approachable.

    9. The main effect of the training session was significant only for the executive network [F(1,78) = 9.859; P < 0.01]. More importantly, the group × session interaction was significant for the executive network [F(1,78) = 10.839; P < 0.01], indicating that the before vs. after difference in the conflict resolution score was significant only for the trained group

      This would imply improved equanimity, but perhaps not long term focus improvement.

    10. Performance of the ANT after 5 days of IBMT or control. Error bars indicate 1 SD. Vertical axis indicates the difference in mean reaction time between the congruent and incongruent flankers. The higher scores show less efficient resolution of conflict.

      This particular study seems to show that the change in focus efficiency was actually better in the control group than the experiment group.