14 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. According to Marcus Weaver-Hightower, a professor of Educational Foundations and Research at UND, our legislators are not only cutting programs and their courses, but they have: Recently floated policy ideas about keeping almost everyone but the North Dakota-born out of our colleges and universities. Some ideas have included capping enrollment (some plans include not letting Minnesotans in), eliminating tuition waivers and cutting on-campus jobs. The thinking is apparently that “foreigners” come and sponge off ofour resources, then leave without contributing to North Dakota

      Right - as Ryan comments. These proposals were voted down. So you are attacking legislators for something they voted down. That's not fair. Doesn't the evidence suggest, after all, that they don't want to do this? If they did, they would have voted yes. I think this needs some adjustment. Maybe "The atmosphere is such that some legislators even proposed . . . . " That would capture the sense of threat higher ed has felt, without painting with too broad a brush.

    2. Higher education is not a priority for Burgum. It is difficult to believe that he is genuinely interested in changing educational methods in K-12. Burgum also promises to “support our state’s most vulnerable people” while allowing UND's administration, deans and departments to gutthe liberal arts programwhile maintaining the robust vocational oriented training programs such as the medical school, nursing program, engineering, mining, aerospace and the UAS program

      Avoid ad hominum attacks.

    3. The state of North Dakota is dumbing-down education and robbing our youth of the critical aspects of a liberal education.

      Maybe. But that's a really big claim. After all, one can still get a graduate degree in History at NDSU it seems. UND is not the only game in town. I think this is a bit of an over-reach as written. To claim an all encompassing effect, one would have to consider all the insitutions in the State. I'd suggest go with your strength - keep it local. That should be enough.

    4. While an emphasis on technical programs may produce students who are work-force ready, these types of programs lack the "experience and wisdom" that studying history provides.65

      The humanities vs. vocation theme comes up frequently. To make the case that administrators are deliberately driving that way, it's not enough to show that History has been cut. You are going to have to show that it has been disproportionately cut. Or tone down this rhetoric. After all, if History is really important a cut is damaging, no matter what the cause or proportionality.

    5. Doug Burgum, the governor of North Dakota, believes that these budget cuts, especially at the university level, are necessary in order to “position our state for long-term success with a leaner budget that is more adaptable to volatile swings in commodity prices.”

      A comment for all the references to the Governor. It's more complicated than this. Governor Burgum proposed a budget, which the legislature set aside. Then, on their own, the legislature came to the large cuts to higher ed. So it's not just the Governor. Plus, there is the reality that there is less money. Either the State taps into its savings (and it has refused to do so), or something has to be cut.

    6. By offering that understanding of the present, we as historians are able to help society prepare for possible futures

      I think what migh help is a bit of discussion of how history achieves these ends. Do we elect historians? What it the mechanism by which this understanding is transmitted. Get the reader from "what history can do" to an understanding of how it is doing it.

    7. As an example we can look at the concerns among American leaders about the rising power and importance of China. When analyzing the reasons behind the growth of the People’s Republic of China in the late 20thand early 21stcenturies,and the basis of their foreign policy, a social scientist might look at a number of factors. Issues such as the growing military strength of the Chinese;an economic expansion that has spanned over thirty years;the impact of Deng Xioping (Dvng Syauping) on the modernization of the Chinese government after the death of Mao Zedong (Mau Dzvtong); Chinese concerns over the issue of Taiwan;or the effect of the Sino-Soviet split of the 1960’s on PRC China foreign policy, a split which prompted their strategy of realigning themselves with the United States in the 1970’s.55The historian would look at these issues, but would also illustrate that for PRC China much of their 20thcentury foreign policy came from a strategic consideration of China’s past interactions with Western nations in the 19thcentury. The unequal treaties between Qing (Ching) Imperial China and European powers such as the United Kingdom, France or Germanyleft a heavy influence on how China positions itself in world politics.56Historians would note that the old Western view of China, based out of the late 19thcentury, as being unwarlike, backwards, and poor was a mistaken basis by which to judge thepowerand longevity of China. They could point out past examples of Chinese military strength such as the massive military expansion of China under the Qing (Ching) Dynasty, culminating with the conquest of Xinjiang (Syinjyang), and theQing (Ching) Dynasty’sheavy emphasis on military prowess as a counter to the passive view taken from the 19thcentury.5

      I think this is overly detailed; you run the risk of losing the reader.

    8. By cutting funding for the Graduate History Program, UND deprives the state of North Dakota of people who are trained in analyzing the long-term perspective of events, such as past budget cuts, and can offer solutions that lead to a more sustainable future.

      If you are going to convince the non-sympathetic reader, you will need an example or two of when historians saved the day.

    9. Universities now serve more as a production and vocational breeding ground for professional training that will lead the way (preferably via drones) into the future.

      This is a bit hyperbolic. There are lots of students completing liberal arts degrees.

    10. President Thomas Kane called for the elimination of low-enrolment classes, a reduction in equipment purchases, an increase in teaching loads, and voluntary staff reductions

      This is interesting. What does it mean that the same solutions are being offered today. Does it mean a cycle of growth/bloat and shrinkage/right-sizing? Or maybe it means this is just old rhetoric, and no one ever makes significant changes after all.

    11. f STEM is the acronym of the future it leaves out an important letter -H, which in this particular case stands for History, but can also represent the Humanities. The Humanities, or Geisteswissenschaften(the sciences of the mind!), are not included.

      This is a bit of a straw-man argument. STEM initiatives are designed to correct under-enrollment in key fields. It's difficult to fill these jobs in the US. That said, it seems to have contributed to a fetishization of SCIENCE, as demonstrated by recent March for Science marches.