3 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2020
    1. Qualitative research is a vital aspect of research in primary care and qualitative studies with a clear and important clinical message can be highly cited [2Hepworth J, Key M. General practitioners learning qualitative research: a case study of postgraduate education. Aust Fam Physician 2015;44:760–763.  [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar],3Greenhalgh T, Annandale E, Ashcroft R, et al. An open letter to the BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ. 2016;352:i563. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]]. This series intends to provide novice researchers an introduction to information about conducting high-quality qualitative research in the field of primary care. By novice researchers, we mean Master’s students and junior researchers in primary care as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time.

      I am an undergraduate student and I am taking a course in qualitative research techniques. I found this article quite interesting and easy to understand. I really like how they start from the constructivist paradigm. I bet it will help me a lot so that my future research with qualitative methods is of quality.

  2. Oct 2020
    1. Yet Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholars have provocatively argued that the ubiquity of – particularly online – digital data finally allows these two opposing research traditions to converge (Latour et al., 2012; Venturini and Latour, 2010). Indeed, a growing number of ‘qualitatively’ inclined STS researchers are beginning to use automated, computational techniques, particularly forms of data visualization, for the purposes of interpretive, rather than purely statistical analyses (Abildgaard et al., 2017; Marres and Weltevrede, 2013; Rogers, 2013; Venturini and Latour, 2010; Venturini et al., 2018).

      I loved your article, it is proof that now more than ever, thanks to technology, the systematization and digitization of the world, it is possible to make the opposites converge (in this case speaking of qualitative and quantitative methods), and even combine their techniques and use its tools to achieve the objectives of each approach and have a more complete analysis.

    2. Yet Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholars have provocatively argued that the ubiquity of – particularly online – digital data finally allows these two opposing research traditions to converge (Latour et al., 2012; Venturini and Latour, 2010). Indeed, a growing number of ‘qualitatively’ inclined STS researchers are beginning to use automated, computational techniques, particularly forms of data visualization, for the purposes of interpretive, rather than purely statistical analyses (Abildgaard et al., 2017; Marres and Weltevrede, 2013; Rogers, 2013; Venturini and Latour, 2010; Venturini et al., 2018).

      I loved your article, it is proof that now more than ever, thanks to technology, the systematization and digitization of the world, it is possible to make the opposites converge (in this case speaking of qualitative and quantitative methods), and even combine their techniques and use its tools to achieve the objectives of each approach and have a more complete analysis.