7 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2020
    1. We want people in our schools who can interact in a compassionate way; people who understand childhood development. Schools need counselors, not police. Even the most caring and best-trained police officer cannot, and should not be expected to, operate as counselors in our schools.

      I like this statement, if your gonna have officers in school it would be good to have officers who are child friendly who don't scare or harm students. Officers who make it known their there to keep students safe and mean no harm. To an officer it should important that kids don't fear him/her in a bad way.

    2. tudy after study has shown that arrest rates, particularly for Black students for minor offenses, are higher in schools that have officers, despite efforts to teach de-escalation. Arrests have terrible consequences for students. When a student is arrested, the odds of that student dropping out of high school doubles. Just a single court appearance for a student makes that student four times more likely to drop out. Those statistics bear out in real-world consequences. Just 26% of students arrested graduate from high school. A study published in Adolescent Research Review in 2016 reviewed and analyzed existing research and found that schools with police have higher rates of exclusionary discipline, such as out-of-school suspensions and expulsions, than do other comparable schools. Which begs the question: If the consequences for students being arrested are so significant in shaping their young adulthood, why are police officers even in schools in the first place? Advocates say that police presence in schools is a matter of keeping students safe.

      I feel as though police being there for only safety purpose are also not only the case on why their there. Police shouldn't be in the school if all their gonna do is arrest the students for any little thing, there suppose to protect us from real world stuff coming at the school. If that's not what there doing then there's no need for them to be there.

    3. Police should not be in our schools. The harm caused by a police presence in schools far outweighs any arguments about the presence of police making a school safer.

      Although i do think police being inside a school is a problem, i feel as though them being there does make it safer. People want police out because it makes certain students uncomfortable, But what about if someone tried to come shoot up the school or tried to get in to don harm to other students the police could be there on the outside to protect us. So yes them making stuff safer is very valid and can go against this point.

    4. As cities across the country debate police reform in the wake of massive civil unrest following the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers, many people have questioned whether officers belong in schools.

      I think what happened is a very valid reason to second guess having police in schools. i think they are because after what happened African American kids feel unsafe around officers, thinking everything they do around will be token differently then other kids.

    1. Entire teams started putting out statements and talking about action plans that came out of conversations between management and labor. Instead of players striking, it was teams announcing that they would not be playing: “labor and management against racism!” The Baltimore Ravens are a great example of this, putting out on the team letterhead a statement decrying racism, calling for the arrest of Breonna Taylor’s killers, all with the aim—at least for now—of appeasing some fed-up football players whose season is supposed to start in less than two weeks.

      What was the whole outcome of the whole team going on strike ? and Why did they think not playing would be going against racism?

      1. i think if they stop playing it shows that they wont play for races people, they refuse to play if there community is gonna be races. Most of these players are African american and they wont play for people who enjoy basket ball if their races.
    2. That led to the Milwaukee Bucks’ decision not to play Wednesday in their playoff game against the Orlando Magic. Other NBA teams followed suit. Then the WNBA teams announced that they would be sitting out, which was stirring, but not surprising. Then Major League Baseball joined the strike, which really was stunning given its conservative history and paucity of Black American players. Then Major League Soccer and, gobsmackingly, the National Hockey League. Naomi Osaka, the tennis star of Japanese-Haitian descent, also bowed out of her tournament and tweeted the following, which summed up so many of the feelings across the sports world:

      When did they decide them sitting out was a strike? why did other people take it as one?

      Although it was never announced it was a strike i think other players took it as one and decided to join because they sat out due to the fact that there was still no change so no change no game.

    3. The NBA and WNBA players argued back in June about whether to play in this Covid-free bubble or if they should just sit out the season so as not to distract from the demonstrations in the streets.

      Why do they think them playing this season would be a distraction?

      I think they think it would be a distraction because people would be more worried about basket ball season coming back and forget about the black lives matter movement.