12 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2025
    1. We can leave; we can conform; or we can express ourselves, argue and protest, and try to change the situation. I am arguing for the last. Becoming visible and using one's voice can be dangerous — even in purportedly free societies like the U.S. — but these strategies can also be successful in the long-run, contributing to local and systemic change.

      This gives the same energy as if you are not a part of the solution you are part of the problem. And to some extent, I think this is absolutely true. We need to be passionate about our children and be able to take care of our students and treat them well and with kindness. I would caution however that it is equaly important to not divide people in our language and educate and empathize with those who may disagree.

    2. As I, and many others see it, the main problem with labels is that they conceal more than they reveal, and they change the way we see people. Further, labels, especially those used in special education, tend to emphasize "deficiencies" and focus perception and action on remediation of the perceived deficits.

      This is a really interesting concept. Labels do identify, but maybe in the nature of indentification, they also constrain what someone can be and who they are. In this context with Disabled students, maybe our language of identifying and labeling should be something that in fact encompasses their experiences better, or more broadly, remove labeling all together and have holistic views of people, no matter their background.

    3. Lydia sees several doctors for problems related to her delays. For example, she wears a back brace for scoliosis and we go regularly to both her orthopedist specialist and the prosthetics office to check her progress and the effectiveness of the brace.

      This breaks my heart. The amount of actual time that these treatments must take to be able to help and heal her must take alot of time throughout the day to be able to then go to svhool and all while trying to get through her pain, learn, socialize and develop her mind just seems so impossible. It is important for us to have empathy for these students that simply have more obstacles than perhaps a typical child. So we must do better in finding ways to accomadate.

    1. If this is the case, what is deemed appropriate or inappropriate totalk about in school is subject to political debate, rather than a fundamental right for all.

      I think it''s really difficult for a school to be able to manage and facilitate the varying conversations that occur as a result of these divides. It's imprtant to open the line of communication so that we are better able to understand eachother and the nature of our beings, and then promote what is right, and debate what is wrong.

    2. The idea of being both queer and Asian has bothered Ngo for a majority of his K-12 years. That,and along with the pressures to succeed in an Asian-American family household, is somethingthat left him questioning his own intersectionality and gender identity. As Ngo remarks, “as ateen growing up in this society, being LGBTQ and being Asian - you could not be both at thesame time. That was what I was raised to believe in

      I would say that this is a simialir thing for Latinos, They tend to have alot of undertoned remarks that make it difficult for LGBTQ students to succeed in these enviroments, they feel that they would be looked at negatively if they showed their family who they really are. We hope that the families are loving and carinf for their children, no matter what.

    1. Teachers were positioned as authority figures who ought not to express theirown position on the issue, while students were allowed to continue to shapethe school environment in ways that let at least some opinions on homo-sexuality circulate freely.

      I think it is important to be able to facilitate and manage the realitys of the LGBTQ community, It's important so that dialogue and understanding can be bridged and students don't feel that this is something out of the ordinary.

    2. Teachers themselves may find it difficult in some context toadvocate for LGBTQ students either because they themselves <lo not wantco be outed or because they are concerned they will be misrecognizcd asLGBTQ because of their advocacy.

      I think this is really hard because I think teachers are really tryin hard to please people from all factions, groups and affliations. So this is an understandable reaction that they feel that they are not equipped to handle LGBTQ students.

    3. Me~bers o[ school communities may believe that sexuality is not anappropriate topic for young people. However, there are significant numbersof LGBTQ and ally students in schools, as well as significant numbers ofsexually aware heterosexual students.

      This is an interesting concept to go by, I think because we live in a society that subconciously supports heterosexual values, by not talking about LGBTQ topics, it is then perceived as not being adressed. In another reality, the presence of sexuality, hetero or homo, should not and would not matter, therefore not needing to be adressed in the curriculum, and I think that is what proponents of that idea really mean.

    1. Whiteness and uninterrogated racism of WhiteLGBTQ youth have yet to be adequately challenged

      This is super accurate, I have personally witnessed that there seems to be a white culture that dominates the lgbtq community. In fact I've then in turn seen how White LGBTQ people then belittle the experience that minorities undergo, claiming themselves to have the same experience. This is a extremely dangerous route to look at people that are ambitous in continuing to put racial minorities down, as it gives them an avenue to opress while being perceived as a fellow oppressed.

    2. It may, of course, be difficult for adher-ents of particular religious traditions to embrace the same interpretations ofthe intensity of same-sex love and commitment within their texts as LGBTQpeople of faith do or even to begin to grapple with the possibility that posi-tive representations coexist with prohibitions against similar activities

      As a person of faith, this concept is really interesting. I see that alot of people are quick to belittle LGBTQ members and yet forget to lead their actions with love. It is definitely something that needs to be worked upon within our religous community.

    3. lder ideas about male-female relationships havechanged; for instance, the necessity for feminine submissiveness to malepower has waned significantly.

      I definitely think as our society has evolved roles have also simealtaeously evolved to become more progressive. I think it's interesting that these concepts were there to begin with and I am curious what the social or evolutionary reason as to why these norms were instilled in the first place.

    4. One way to think about the roots of homophobiais to think about how gender normativity-what counts as a "normal" maleor female-gets taught and learned.

      This is interesting, I think many times we dont consider what it really means to be considered to be normal in our society. All we know through our feelings is that we want to fit in. But the reality is that we are all unique individuals that have somehow collectively agreed what is "normal." It is so important to be able to understand our biases and perception of truth.