This is a very detailed description of your plan in the next phase. Could you tell us more about how these steps can be served as (part of) your evidence to the question and argument you want to make? Just a bit more explanation on the interconnection between your plan and your final argument would be appreciated.

That's totally fine, and this also reminds me of the visualization article we read this week. Perhaps in the process of creating different types of visual displays, you will gradually build up a clearer image of what you want to investigate.

It might be helpful to think about what question you want to explore and what argument you want to address. I know it's almost impossible to figure out the tool you find the most efficient at the beginning, but having a clear idea of your research question would be beneficial to this challenge.

I would like to hear a little bit about why you choose Palladio Map to visualize the density of x-ray journals at the beginning. What are the advantages of this tool compares to others?

Hi Kathryn, when clicking on "Airtable", it will directly link to the homepage of Airtable but not your dataset page (not sure this is a technical problem only to me). Could you please check that? But anyway clicking on the arirtable image above is no problem!

This is very interesting. Would you mind providing more details about how you transcribing documents?--since this would also be the primary sources of your digital project and the evidence to your argument.

This is the person and his life&work you want to focus on. I am still wondering if you have a research argument about him/his artworks.

I agree with you about the possibility of exploring diverse questions/argument in the process of collecting dataset on Airtable, but I am still quite unclear about your research question as well as your preliminary argument so far. Could you address it clearly by any chance?

This reminds me of the visualization article we've just read, that it's useful to discover the value of visualization itself as a research process. In this case, Airtable might be the one that you want to engage with. My question here is how do you think that the visual functions of Airtable are sufficient enough to represent your argument?

Hi Marisol, it seems I have annotated to another link of your iteration (http://artspeaktome.blogspot.com/#annotations:QBd6MBV-EeuFYcOZI1TWEw). I'll transfer my annotations to here.

Pretty clear research question! Would you like to provide a preliminary argument followed by this puzzle?

I think so far you've gotten enough data for your project--that's pretty good to figure out the primary source at the beginning!

Quanzhou is also an unforgettable place where I traveled!!--I've been there in summer 2017 during a field research regarding diverse religious culture/architecture/customs in Quanzhou.

This is very interesting. Would you mind providing more details about how you transcribing documents?--since this would also be the primary sources of your digital project and the evidence to your argument.

This is the person and his life&work you want to focus on. I am still wondering if you have a research argument about him/his artworks.

I agree with you about the possibility of exploring diverse questions/argument in the process of collecting dataset on Airtable, but I am still quite unclear about your research question as well as your preliminary argument so far. Could you address it clearly by any chance?

This reminds me of the visualization article we've just read, that it's useful to discover the value of visualization itself as a research process. In this case, Airtable might be the one that you want to engage with. My question here is how do you think that the visual functions of Airtable are sufficient enough to represent your argument?