7 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2023
    1. since the primary contributors were White men engaged in CS research, and who lacked any training in education or education research

      Same to many STEM male professors. They are good scholars, but not good educators

    2. These first programs, which graduated the doctoral students who became faculty at many of the other universities founding CS departments, established the early conditions for the lack of gender and racial diversity in CS education, shifting CS education from something informal amongst women mathematicians, to something only accessible to students at elite institutions, who tended to teach only White men.

      It reminds me the history of female educators -- especially how female jobs are easily connected with low income

    1. “Why am I putting thisstudent in this group? Do I fully understandtheir strengths in programming, or am Imaking assumptions about their abilities basedon the fact that they have an IEP?”

      I appreciate this strength-based design -- similar to the idea of diverse math smartness, I think this kind of CS smartness will help to create equitable classroom environment that everyone use their strength to learn CS more deeply

    2. It may mean a group ofstudents form a “Help Desk” to assist others,rather than waiting for the teacher to come tothe rescue when there is a problem

      establish positive interdependence

    1. position youthas creators rather than consumers of technologies

      It is important that tech is help to teaching and learning, so the goal of learning should not just be learning the available technologies.

    2. s tinkerability: “Make iteasy to incrementally build up creations and knowledge by experi-menting with new ideas and features

      The "tinkerability" helps the learning to be "dynamic, interactional, and emergent" (p. 247), making it a culturally responsive computing.