This can be complicated by a more critical reading of these texts, and looking at who was able to practice the democratic process and speech. While it was written in this way it was not enacted in that way, as best put by MLK "I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed". this is that their is a separation from what was written and what was enacted for all of time.

This is because a SNS is a private business, so they don't have to host any thing they don't want to. But this is compilated more because they don't take ownership of the speech, so law breaking speech can be hosted.

This is what leads to partisan SNS, because the type and form of an advert will be different along party/ideological lines

you mean X, right?

I think that the playbook has changed but censorship is still possible.

An interesting way of looking at modern media practices. I think it also needs to be highlighted that you can target media toward a very specific audience and make sure it reaches them without too much oversight.

All media is created for profit.

I don't think this is true. People need to know how to read, write, and understand arguments in the workplace. whether they are communicating with coworkers, talking to their bosses, or reading contracts. It’s also a very valuable part of being a democratic nation. A democracy without a well-versed populace is unable to make sound decisions

This sounds like it would be very boring and dishearting.