F. The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that: (a) he has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes; (b) he has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee; (c) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

101 (1) A claim is ineligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division if

(a) refugee protection has been conferred on the claimant under this Act;

(b) a claim for refugee protection by the claimant has been rejected by the Board;

(c) a prior claim by the claimant was determined to be ineligible to be referred to the Refugee Protection Division, or to have been withdrawn or abandoned;

(c.1) the claimant has, before making a claim for refugee protection in Canada, made a claim for refugee protection to a country other than Canada, and the fact of its having been made has been confirmed in accordance with an agreement or arrangement entered into by Canada and that country for the purpose of facilitating information sharing to assist in the administration and enforcement of their immigration and citizenship laws;

(d) the claimant has been recognized as a Convention refugee by a country other than Canada and can be sent or returned to that country;

(e) the claimant came directly or indirectly to Canada from a country designated by the regulations, other than a country of their nationality or their former habitual residence; or

(f) the claimant has been determined to be inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights, serious criminality or organized criminality.

(e) the claimant came directly or indirectly to Canada from a country designated by the regulations, other than a country of their nationality or their former habitual residence

1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.

2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.

1. No Contracting State shall expel or return (“refouler”) a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, member- ship of a particular social group or political opinion.
2. The benefit of the present provision may not, however, be claimed by a refugee whom there are reasonable grounds for regarding as a danger to the security of the country in which he is, or who, having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime, constitutes a danger to the community of that country

(3) A claim for refugee protection made by a person inside Canada must be made in person to an officer, must not be made by a person who is subject to a removal order, and is governed by this Part.

95 (1) Refugee protection is conferred on a person when

(a) the person has been determined to be a Convention refugee or a person in similar circumstances under a visa application and becomes a permanent resident under the visa or a temporary resident under a temporary resident permit for protection reasons;

**(b) the Board determines the person to be a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection; or

(c) except in the case of a person described in subsection 112(3), the Minister allows an application for protection.**

E. This Convention shall not apply to a person who is recognized by the competent authorities of the country in which he has taken residence as having the rights and obligations which are attached to the possession of the nationality of that country.

F. The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that: (a) he has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes; (b) he has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his admission to that country as a refugee; (c) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Pictures usually have a caption in Facebook group posts (and Facebook in general)

https://www.facebook.com/visitcaribbean/photos/rpp.128821617182031/2830310480366451/?type=3&theater

https://www.facebook.com/visitcaribbean/photos/rpp.128821617182031/2828942793836553/?type=3&theater

The post were accompanied by photos as Facebook groups (especially travel based ones) are littered with pictures.

https://www.facebook.com/HaysTravel/ https://www.facebook.com/visitcaribbean/

Groups are now able to add rules. I find that this is a great feature as it lets persons who want to join know what is and isn't allowed. The following groups have them:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/426226078022411/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/1599386593631028/

As we are going through a pandemic, links are being posted for persons to get equipment for to stay safe or for them to read up on the virus.

https://www.facebook.com/mycaribbean/photos/a.4428497190553569/4428482920554996/?type=3&theater https://www.facebook.com/CaribbeanTravelToday/

A description helps users to know what kind of group they are joining so I added one to make sure that my group would align with Facebook customs

https://www.facebook.com/groups/Queenofallthingsdisney/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/245258698866841/

Teachers like Betty make me happy. Instead of shunning tech, she embraces it and gets her students involved to better prepare them.

Not really a point, but I recognized this name from using one of his research papers in one of my research papers

This is something I think lecturers and TAs realise. Getting future writers to critique each others work is a good way forward.

I agree. I find that it's even sparked some discussion on how jobs are affected (editors might be less necessary thanks to processors like Grammarly, Google Docs, Word, etc.)