10 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2017
    1. It used to be that all you could see in a program for writing documents was the text itself, and to change the layout or font or margins, you had to write special “control codes,” or commands that would tell the computer that, for instance, “this part of the text should be in italics.”

      That is in fact how for example LaTeX, Markdown and reStructuredText work and how some of us like to work with it. At least for me, it is liberating to be able to work directly with the plain and simple mark-up that exposes what is really going on instead of struggling with the sometimes endless frustration with trying to guess what Word seems to have misunderstood about how you want to format the text.

    2. Code is too hard to think about. Before trying to understand the attempts themselves, then, it’s worth understanding why this might be: what it is about code that makes it so foreign to the mind, and so unlike anything that came before it.

      This is a good point. It reminded me of a good example of this from my own experience: Many years ago when I took my first programming course in university, we were given the assignment of programming "Tower of Hanoi" - in Pascal - to understand recursive functions. Although I understood how to program it, I recently realised that I never quite grasped how the method actually works. I realised this as my 7-year-old came home from school one day recently, sat down and drew and cut out his own game of "Tower of Hanoi" from pieces of paper, and impressively solved the puzzle with 8 pieces. It was not until I actually saw him solve it with physical pieces of paper that I understood the recursive nature of the solution method.

  2. Jan 2016
    1. eLife spent approximately $774,500 on vendor costs (equivalent to 15% of their total expenses). Given that eLife published 800 articles in 2014, their marginal cost of scholarly communication was $968 per article.

      But how do we know if any costs of "normal business operations" are included in this amount - for example cost of DOI membership? If they are, this estimate is not comparable to those above.

    2. As our focus is on marginal cost, we excluded the membership fee from our calculations.

      So at least DOI membership seems to be part of normal business operations.

    3. We defined the minimum requirements for scholarly communication as: 1) submission, 2) management of editorial workflow and peer review, 3) typesetting, 4) DOI registration, and 5) long-term preservation.

      These seem like very reasonable requirements.

    4. The marginal cost only takes into account the cost of producing one additional scholarly article, therefore excluding fixed costs related to normal business operations.

      What exactly is included in

      normal business operations

    5. an agent looking to start an independent, peer-reviewed scholarly journal.

      If you are actually looking to start a journal from scratch, wouldn't you want to include all the costs involved in running it? (See the definition of the marginal cost further down.)

  3. Nov 2015
    1. A mixture of quantitative and qualitative measures might also be worthwhile. Statements of appraisal by reviewers (i.e. manually collated sentiment- and context- aware citations) could be interesting.

      I recently tried to formulate my ideas about this. Have a look here: Peer Evaluation of Science

  4. Aug 2015