I would include in this chapter some mention to the fact that if you are mostly interested in prediction, the the se of the coefficients might not be that relevant and the multicollinearity might be a red herring. I think that is what these guys discuss: @Article{Morrissey2018, author = {Michael B. Morrissey and Graeme D. Ruxton}, title = {Multiple Regression Is Not Multiple Regressions: The Meaning of Multiple Regression and the Non-Problem of Collinearity}, doi = {10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0010.003}, number = {20200624}, volume = {10}, file = {:multiple-regression-is-not-multiple-regressions-the-meaning.pdf:PDF}, groups = {10PrinciplesMEE}, journal = {Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology}, month = {jun}, publisher = {University of Michigan Library}, year = {2018}, } so that couls be a good reference to add somewhere?

Thanks so much for this. Sounds like I just learned a new trick I had no idea was around - cool stuff re allowing on the fly annotation to send you feedback. I have a Bookdown document that might have looked what this looked like many years ago, essentially a write up of stuff I don in class with students I'd hope to turn into a book one day.

Such a cool idea!

I note below "Data4Ecologists", here "Data4Ecologist"

not hyperlinked on purpose?

Just testing this "annotations" feature. I note you have no mention of section 12, on MCMC stuff. Not sure it's on purpose, but since ou mentioned all others...