I think doxing should be banned because it involves personal privacy issues. If a user wants to retaliate against another user, they can obtain the other user's information by using doxing. If the other party's information appears on the Internet, no matter what the person says, it may affect that person's life.

I see doxing pop up all the time on the internet. Whenever there is a popular event, information about the protagonist of the event will soon appear on the Internet. I don't think this is a good behavior because it can seriously affect a person's daily life.

I think there is still an impact between social media and personal life. When people are swiped by a lot of screens, the information that is easy to see is misleading. Many times, people's views are often the views that people want to see, even if they are not correct.

I agree with this approach. If a person who wants to commit suicide continues to receive other information about suicide on the Internet, it is likely to increase the possibility of suicide. However, when the information he receives becomes more POSITIVE information, he is likely that he will not choose to commit suicide.

For the first time, I learned that sharing funny videos and sharing news are different types of sharing. I usually like to share the interesting videos I see with my friends. This is a kind of Virality.

This article shows that Facebook will obtain the user's personal information without the consent of the user, which seems to violate the user's personal privacy. Without the user's knowledge, their personal information may have been known by others. This will allow users to receive unnecessary harassment.

This reminds me of some videos to attract people to click the video through the title. There are more people who clicks, and even if they do n’t finish watching, he will increase his clicks, then he earns popularity.

Myopia is a problem that many people have now. It is more of a congenital problem than acquired factors.

Disabled people can be no different from normal people through assistive devices. In my CSE class, I wrote a program about helping blind people use specific software. That program will help blind people read the content, so that they can use the software even if they cannot see.

This article mentioned that after Musk acquired Twitter, he had the data permissions of all users, and even if the user clicks to delete the account, the previous data will not really disappear. So does this mean that as long as a modern person has used the Internet, he will definitely leave his traces.

I find this very interesting. Passwords exist for the security of each user's account, but if someone can directly see the passwords of all users, it seems unsafe. But this is completely understandable, because if necessary, for example, the police need to investigate a person, they may start with social accounts.

This article tells that even if you do not register a website, they can still get your data through your friends. For example, your friend posted your photos on Facebook. Even if you do not have a Facebook account, they can still know you through photos.

This reminds me of some video websites to recommend videos to you through your preferences. For example, if I am paying attention to a game, then I may watch a video about that game, and the website may automatically push me relevant videos. The purpose is to let me stay more on their website.

This reminds me of some video websites to recommend videos to you through your preferences. For example, if I am paying attention to a game, then I may watch a video about that game, and the website may automatically push me relevant videos. The purpose is to let me stay more on their website.

This rumor -making incident reminds me of many Internet celebrities who want to get attention through some things. And they often show a more exciting life than ordinary people, so that more people will pay attention to them. But this is also a waste of public resources.

This reminds me of the comments issued by some people on the Internet intentionally with the elements of warfare, the purpose is to arouse people's quarrels. I don't understand what this significance is.

This reminds me that some scammers will lure their victims by falsifying personal information. They usually disguise themselves as some special identity, such as staff of an institution, to cause trouble for their victims. In the end, these troubles are usually solved by the victims through money.

Social media is very important to people today. It can be said that people today cannot live without social media. Social media allows people in different locations to stay connected. Now I can communicate with my parents in China through video calls, which was not possible in the last century.

This is the first time I know that email existed so long ago, and this method of communication continues to this day. Many times, if you want to communicate seriously with others, email is an indispensable means of communication.

Twitter is one of the most popular social media platforms used by Americans today. Users can see whatever they like. But I don’t know the specific difference between twitter and ins.

This reminds me of some of my friends who like photography. They often take pictures on the street. Some of the photos are taken by strangers, and they post the photos online. Even though they didn't have permission, it's still not ethical.

This website is a website that buys social media followers. These followers are robots. They do not have any substantial impact on your posts. They just follow you and make your homepage look like more people are following it. When other real users follow you, they will think that you are very popular.

What I think a bot can do that a normal user cannot do is stay calm at all times. No matter what kind of emotions other users are talking to, the robot can maintain a calm attitude and reply. In contrast, human users are likely to be influenced by the emotions of other users.