The counterfactual JPI answers: what would the index look like if Rule 244435 had not been implemented?
Time allowing it would be worth cross-checking your approach against a simple but-for model
The counterfactual JPI answers: what would the index look like if Rule 244435 had not been implemented?
Time allowing it would be worth cross-checking your approach against a simple but-for model
We measure this by checking how many days each job continues to appear in searchablejobs_consistent after the rule fires.
Is this stable with respect to the impact of the Waldo Rule implementation? Meaning is it possible that getting hit by such a Waldo rule could cause an employer to kill the job entirely?
We exclude jobs that also matched any of the top 5 overlapping Waldo rules (236670, 238460, 242999, 236710, 236709) so that we only reclaim jobs impacted exclusively by the 30 day organic visibility policy.
I get the intuition here, but is this stable? Meaning if another overlapping waldo rule were removed then a given job woudl be hit by Rule 244435 wouldn't it?