This is a very good point. The issue is not AI itself, but rather the lack of laws and regulations surrounding its use. Currently, there are few protections in place to safeguard workers or hold tech companies accountable for how they implement AI. Without clear policies and oversight, the concerns about job displacement, unfair labor practices, and the misuse of AI are very real and justified. Establishing legal frameworks and ethical guidelines will be essential to ensuring that AI develops in a way that benefits workers rather than harms them.

This is a fair point. It’s not that AI is necessarily causing consultants to lose their jobs consultants are still needed because they bring a level of creativity that AI currently lacks. However, since AI is such a new and rapidly developing field, consultants don’t necessarily have more experience implementing it than the employees already working within companies.

This seems to bring another issue that it replaces true crtive ideas from humans and coming up with there own anserws and thoughts in school they are useing AI in place of there own thoughts and just fleshing out the Ais reapted idea.

While phone cameras often produce higher-quality images in terms of sharpness and convenience, I believe they feel less real. This is a good example of why images from a dedicated camera can feel more authentic and why some people say they even look better despite technically having lower resolution or fewer features than your phone.

From both a physics and practical standpoint, the larger lens of a dedicated camera captures more light, which makes it perform better in low-light situations. Personally, I prefer the experience of using a camera over a phone. It feels more intentional and personal, even if it's less convenient.