within participants’ natural, everyday environments,
this seems more difficult, since phenomena observed at one, particular spot at one particular time of day may not be representative of a general phenomena.
within participants’ natural, everyday environments,
this seems more difficult, since phenomena observed at one, particular spot at one particular time of day may not be representative of a general phenomena.
This results in the perception that “they” really differ from us, and “they” are all alike.
"We" vs "They" theory?-can lead to automatic biases
people will often exaggerate the differences between their in-group and the outgroup
justify by identifying more similarities between themselves and their in-group and differences between themselves and the outer groups
outgroup disliking stems from this in-group liking
disliking others come from preferring the "in-group" more-not bc of unconscious biases towards those other groups as in automatic biases
allocating fewer resources to disliked outgroups
real estate/selling houses-discrimination against POC
hat automatic or unconscious hesitation (a result of having mixed evaluations about the outgroup) will show up in the test.
exposes the unconscious bias
relatively automatic, that is, unintended, immediate, and irresistible.
must be aware of it to catch yourself when you regard another group as less favorable
automatic, ambiguous, and ambivalent,
automatic, subconscious
real in their consequences.
correlate to higher incarceration rates for MOC and lower graduation rates for POC
Still, these biases exist in people; they’re just less in view than before.
very important!! too often, ppl think just bc racism is less blatant (blatant biases are 'gone') that the subtle biases are less nefarious
high RWA and high SDO predicts joining hate groups that openly endorse aggression against minority groups, immigrants, homosexuals, and believers in non-dominant religions
lead to extremist groups
group unity
very conservative idea as well
values or beliefs that the person high in RWA disagrees with, thus “threatening” the collective values of his or her group.
threatens social status quo
“threatens” one’s economic resources
threatens material things-resources
respect for obedience and authority
values obedience, authority, order to an established hierarchy
world is tough and competitive with only a limited number of resources.
and bc of competition-the inferior must be the ones who lose, and who belong at the bottom
while the second group tends to score lower
different if they were in power?
while the second group tends to score lower.
the second group has greater empathy and compassion, less firm belief in inequality as natural-bc they were not decided to be in power
police, prosecutors, business)
police-reputation for implicit biases
work ethic—that hard work always pays off and leisure is a waste of time.
very Republican idea-that certain groups tend to fail bc they are not as hard working-places blame on them
disrupts the social hierarchy the person high in SDO believes in
seems to demote the person's neighborhood
outgroup moved into his or her neighborhood.
"white flight" sentiment
preferred arrangement
equality = not favorable structure for them
some groups are inherently better than others, and because of this, there is no such thing as group “equality.”
may be defined on diff factors-intelligence, merit, skill level, not factors that are uncontrollable (race, gender, etc.)
group hierarchies are inevitable in all societies and are even a good idea to maintain order and stability
hierarchy-natural state of order and gov
conscious beliefs, feelings, and behavior that people are perfectly willing to admit
very conscious, decisive-not subtle or innate
Old-fashioned stereotypes were overt, unapologetic, and expected to be shared by others—what we now call “blatant biases.”
specific, overt, targeted biases/stereotypes about groups
Of all the countries in the world, only a few have equality in their constitution, and those who do, originally defined it for a select group of people.
including the US
their most distinct social group
most visible-why gender and race so common discrimination
negative, emotional reaction to a social group
seems more innate than stereotypes-and less reasoning
people put other people into groups, using that label to inform their evaluation of the person as a whole
makes it easier on us-faster and easier to assess someone based on pre-existing conceptions
became more subtle
but they do not disappear
howing prejudice (emotional bias), stereotypes (cognitive bias), and discrimination (behavioral bias)
interesting-distinctions between prejudice (more automatic, innate?), stereotypes (thinking, ideas about group based on earlier ideas), and discrimination (actions based on prejudice/stereotypes)
are also psychology students,
are conscious of what ppl are testing-will affect results
Aside from being an overrepresentation of young, middle-class Caucasians, college students may also be more compliant and more susceptible to attitude change,
class, age, race-not representative
stronger cognitive skills
more conscious-not representative of all ppl
they apparently only did so after data collection was complete, raising further questions about the ethicality of the study and highlighting concerns about the ability of large, profit-driven corporations to subtly manipulate people’s social lives and choices.
ethics of using big data to do research-invasion of ppl's privacy?
This suggests that race-based violence is associated with the health of the economy.
incredibly interesting-as this has often been the case in American history-times of economic recession have led people to commit race-based acts of violence
replicate these findings have failed
those original findings-not conclusive or totally accurate/can be generalized
As you might imagine, participants in the mortality-primed experimental group typically complete these fragments as COFFIN and SKULL, whereas participants in the control group complete them as COFFEE and SKILL.
so so interesting
were especially motivated to defend their belief system in the face of a violation of the law
reminded of their purpose in life to keep them going
national differences in implicit stereotypes predict national differences in the achievement gap between boys and girls in science and math. Our automatic associations, apparently, carry serious societal consequences.
national belief that girls are not as good at science-means less investment in girls' science educations
likely has a stronger association between males and science than between females and science.
bc of gender stereotypes
instead, a small portable audio recorder or smartphone app is used to automatically record brief snippets of participants’ conversations throughout the day for later coding and analysis.
ethical or unethical? invasion of privacy?
The results showed that mothers reported experiencing more positive emotional states when away from home (including at work), whereas fathers showed the reverse pattern.
interesting-perhaps mothers are more tired of being at home (more often there) and appreciate the change of pace, while fathers are tired of being at work all the time and not being able to interact w/their children
“basking in reflected glory”
feel pride for their school
Later, all three saliva samples were tested for levels of cortisol (a hormone associated with stress) and testosterone (a hormone associated with aggression).
concrete way to measure the changes thru the manipulation of the i.v. s
the control group
where this variable (being insulted) is not tested to see the effects
as “social facilitation,” is reliable—performance on simple or well-rehearsed tasks tends to be enhanced when we are in the presence of others
true! this has been the case for me
Being aware of when our judgments are most accurate, and how our judgments are shaped by social influences, prepares us to be in a much better position to appreciate, and potentially counter, their effects.
better control our judgements towards others, our beliefs, our actions-more self control and understanding of ourselves as well
but they are not made in a vacuum.
context is everything
especially when these individuals do not have the cognitive resources available to override the attitudes’ influence.
incredibly dangerous when individuals are not AWARE of this-learning it may help them recognize it and be able to use their cognitive abilities to override those automatic/instinctive attitudes
with a greater tendency to shoot unarmed Black targets in a video game
which translates to higher shooting rates of black people by police officers
how positively the participant evaluates the object.
a common test for biases as well-how hard or easy is it for ppl to label certain things as negative based on preconceived biases
For example, sometimes it can be difficult to measure people’s true opinions on racial issues, because participants fear that expressing their true attitudes will be viewed as socially unacceptable.
very true-hard to find out what ppl really think-why people criticize "political correctness"
are our general evaluations of things
major part of our identities-how we view other people and things
they might not want to admit to them, such as when holding a certain attitude is viewed negatively by their culture.
SO. TRUE especially at my school during discussions
individuals aren’t always aware of their true attitudes
very true-esp in those surveys, I often choose "neither agree nor disagree" bc I am unsure-and that offers up nothing
Research in this area suggests that our social context—which constantly bombards us with concepts—may prime us to form particular judgments and influence our thoughts and behaviors.
this is why media representation is so important-greatly influences how groups of ppl are viewed by others
been repeatedly associated with each other, one of them can be primed—i.e., made more cognitively accessible—by exposing participants to the (strongly associated) other one.
associating behaviors or objects or other things w/types of ppl-creating a heuretic, mental short-cut-easier for ppl to recognize a certain kind of person based on that behavior or object
a stereotype would be that all women are examples of this schema.
stereotypes v schema: schema-general rep of how a person may behave or think, but not an absolute stereotypes- "all" ppl of this certain category exhibit these traits
That is, automatic mimicry has been shown to lead to more positive social interactions and to increase liking between the mimicked person and the mimicking person.
can lead to ppl "copying" others just so they will be accepted-like "social roles"-mimicking others to fit into that social role
The chameleon effect—where individuals nonconsciously mimic the postures, mannerisms, facial expressions, and other behaviors of their interaction partners—is an example of how people may engage in certain behaviors without conscious intention or awarenes
following other ppl, but instinctive and unconscious-mirroring the other person
such as fear responses, appear to be innate.
not conscious-just instinctive behavior,
relatively automatic process, and aspects of it can occur outside conscious awareness.
similar with making decisions and feeling emotions
inaccuracies when our current mood is irrelevant to the judgment at hand.
may make big conclusions on one's overall life-even if it has to do with a temp, external factor
For example, if you are retrieving many sad memories, you might conclude that you have had a tough, depressing life.
like the "availability heuretic" from before-I fall into this trap often, spiral of self-pity
Some individuals are simply more uncomfortable with ambiguity than others, and are thus more motivated to reach clear, decisive conclusions.
personally, i am more comfortable w/being indecisive (or that is just how i am naturally)
leading to indecision
relatable!
Through this motivated skepticism, people often continue to believe what they want to believe, even in the face of nearly incontrovertible evidence to the contrary.
why it's so hard to convince people of things, esp nowadays w/so much information all the time
whereby we are skeptical of evidence that goes against what we want to believe despite the strength of the evidence
an issue w/public opinion, esp in political sense
directional goals,
motivating agent
because people are generally unaware of the many psychological mechanisms that help us adapt to and cope with negative events
more capable of overcoming negative events than we believe-stronger than we think
how long
even if negatively affected by something-may not last very long
badly they will feel after a negative event
can lead me to be scared to take chances
also overestimate how happy they will feel after a positive event
very true!!-may work so hard for one thing to make you happy-only for that happiness to fade
intensity of their future feelings
very true for me-overestimating how sad i'll feel w/a bad grade or if someone cancels plans
but we often incorrectly predict the strength or duration of those emotions.
very true-often leads to thinking one outcome will be much greater than it actually will be-can lead to anxiety or disappointment
affective forecasting
predicting one's feelings about an outcome
Similarly, although we are generally aware of our knowledge, abilities, and future prospects, our perceptions are often overly positive, and we display overconfidence in their accuracy and potential
or the opposite-overly unconfident in these abilities
for certain behaviors, peer reports are more accurate than self-reports
not self-biased, and have an outside perspective on you
self-expressed interests better predict occupational choice than career inventories (
better to rely on yourself in this career aspect
“thin-slice judgments” has shown that perceivers are able to make surprisingly accurate inferences about another person’s emotional state, personality traits, and even sexual orientation based on just snippets of information
first impressions matter-and are often accurate (though not always). snapshots-only need a couple of seconds to assess someone
In general, we make predictions about others quickly, based on relatively little information.
first impressions come quickly and often stick, unless otherwise proven
We rely on our predictions about the future to guide our actions.
taking in account our past? autobiographical author, on a small scale?
dying in a plane crash is extremely rare, but people often overestimate the probability of it occurring because plane crashes tend to be highly memorable and publicized.
mental short cut-knowing publicized instances of plane crashes makes people more hesitant to board planes, wrongly so
when base-rate information
the facts/the probability and statistics
one’s mental representation of that category.
changing those mental representations can change one's schemas and one's instinctive understandings of something
one can simply judge the likelihood of the object belonging to a category, based on how similar it is to one’s mental representation of that category.
often what I do on tests! (but often wrong as well)
heuristics, which are mental shortcuts that reduce complex problem-solving to more simple, rule-based decisions.
help make decisions and solve problems
A script for dining
"social actor"-know our roles in these situations
greatly reduce the amount of cognitive work we need to do and allow us to “go beyond the information given”
also probably leads to stereotypes-which can have negative effects on our actions and thinking towards others
secondhand sources.
opinions formed from what others tell us
A schema (related to the word schematic) is kind of like a mental blueprint for how we expect something to be or behave
mental schematic of the social experiences we have
forming schemas of the various people, objects, situations, and events we encounter
used to simplify our world-mental short cuts
unconscious processes and implicit attitudes we are unaware of having.
more than just our past knowledge & experiences
What would you make of this scene? What story might you tell yourself to help explain this interesting and unusual behavior?
analyzing outside experiences-often based on our own past experiences/knowledge
how people perceive and think about their social world
more outward than the previous one on "self"
Changing one’s life story is at the heart of many forms of psychotherapy and counseling,
and this is such an important aspect of "Self"-one that we have power over
n cultures that espouse different values and narrative ideals
what is seen as redemption and success in America may NOT be viewed as such in a diff culture
often aim to assimilate their autobiographical memories and aspirations to a redemptive form.
not always true for ppl's lives-often not true in fact
but the same stories can encourage moral righteousness and a naïve expectation that suffering will always be redeemed
which is not always true-not all suffering is redeemed. also, stories that simply praise America and American redemption-can encourage nationalism/too much pride in America and failure to see its shortcomings
American adults who enjoy high levels of mental health and civic engagement tend to construct their lives as narratives of redemption, tracking the move from sin to salvation, rags to riches, oppression to liberation, or sickness/abuse to health/recovery
seeing their lives as progressions, beautiful stories of hardship and overcoming hardship
culture on narrative identity
why race is factoring so much into ppl's development of their identities nowadays-so much cultural commentary. also-nationality and ethnicity super significant in determining someone's "autobiography"
young people seek interpersonal opportunities to share and refine their developing sense of themselves as storytellers (the I) who tell stories about themselves (the Me).
especially w/friends, teachers
er friends often come to her with their boyfriend problems.
social actor-playing social role of giving advice as a friend
he would like to be a marriage counselor
a motivated agent-using this to develop motivations
In more recent years, the teenager notes that her friends often come to her with their boyfriend problems.
the past event influences her present situation
n autobiographical reasoning, a narrator is able to derive substantive conclusions about the self from analyzing his or her own personal experiences.
a certain past experience(s) used to explain core qualities or traits of "the Me"
must author a personalized life story that integrates our understanding of who we once were, who we are today, and who we may become in the future. The story helps to explain, for the author and for the author’s world, why the social actor does what it does and why the motivated agent wants what it wants,
i do this all the time! Analyzing how the good and bad events in my past influence the way I act now
By accepting some definition of who he is, usually on the basis of a function in an economy, a place in the sequence of generations, and a status in the structure of society, the adult is able to selectively reconstruct his past in such a way that, step for step, it seems to have planned him, or better, he seems to have planned it. In this sense, psychologically we do choose our parents, our family history, and the history of our kings, heroes, and gods.
come up w/some sort of explanation for why we are the way we are, how our past has shaped us
It also involves achieving a sense of temporal continuity in life—a reflexive understanding of how I have come to be the person I am becoming, or put differently, how my past self has developed into my present self, and how my present self will, in turn, develop into an envisioned future self.
analyzing self-history
can influence life goals.
they are connected this way
values and life goals.
true, as well as traits for me
change your values or life goals,
in an academic or school setting
When you try to change your traits or roles,
often in social context
always provisional,
never at "end stage" for identity
implications, as well, for how a person moves through life as a social actor,
part of goal-being a good "social actor"? adhering to social constructs?
Committing oneself to an integrated suite of life goals and values is perhaps the greatest achievement for the self as motivated agent.
having strong set of values and goals-crucial to achieving motivated agent status for oneself
children’s self-esteem
failing = low self esteem, which can be unhealthy
demands on students to work hard, adhere to schedules, focus on goals, and achieve success in particular, well-defined task domains. T
grooms them to be motivating agents-lead life with purposes (often for grades, assignments, future)
construct the self as a motivated agent in the elementary school years, layered over their still-developing sense of themselves as social actors.
school-new goals to succeed academically, as well as socially
by the age of 4
fairly young!-understanding this is the age kids become aware that desires/goals drive their actions
purposeful force who moves forward in life in pursuit of self-chosen goals, values, and other desired end states.
this awareness comes later in development
goal-directed, intentional behavior of others,
actions with purposes
motivated agent.
analyze self based on their inner motivations and goals
observing and imitating
social acting-imitation of others
motivated agent.
self-a person with direction and purpose, who acts on those purposes
prioritize the motivational qualities of human behavior—the inner needs, wants, desires, goals, values, plans, programs, fears, and aversions that seem to give behavior its direction and purpose
these inwards parts of self-often considered the most unique, genuine, truest parts of one's "self"
enrich your performances in important social roles,
doing things to help you more in those social roles
Each time you walk out on stage, you have a chance to start anew.
possible every day
To become a more effective social actor, you may want to take aim at the important roles you play in life.
think about how you can become a better friend to someone
broad traits tend to be stubborn, resistant to change,
didn't realize this-really hard to change your core traits
reflected appraisals of others, you realized that even your friends seem to avoid you because you bring them down.
making decisions to change yourself/how others perceive you based on what others have said to you
If you have ever tried hard to change yourself, you may have taken aim at your social reputation, targeting your central traits or your social roles.
this is very relatable-I have examined my friendships, relationships with people I like and don't like, the traits others have attributed to me influence much of how I perceive myself
I reflexively perceive
self-reflection
perceived consistencies
cognition
main currency
reminds me of "social economics theory"-these traits and how well we play them, or how valuable they are-mean greater "currency" and greater success as a social actor
(1) extraversion, (2) neuroticism, (3) agreeableness, (4) conscientiousness, and (5) openness to experience
hard to believe complex personality could boil down to five categories-broad and open to interpretation as they may be
self-conceptions will likely also include important social roles:
definitions of self-important part is how you define your societal roles and how well you play them - "good student, son, friend, etc."
In the development of the self as a social actor, other people function like mirrors—they reflect who I am back to me.
interesting-other ppl's reactions and comments are the "reflection", how someone views themselves and how they can interpret their identity
I come to know who I am as a social actor, Mead argued, by noting how other people in my social world react to my performances.
develop a sense of self and identity based off of how other ppl would react/view them-natural instinct as a young kid, early development
When I fail in the presence of others, I may feel embarrassment or shame. When I violate a social rule, I may experience guilt, which may motivate me to make amends.
explains why ppl get social anxiety and why ppl uphold importance of social rules-sign of "success" in groups, working together w/the consensus of the group
When I do things that win the approval of others, I feel proud of myself
for some people, they seek approval too much-but seeking approval is a basic human instinct
Around the same time, children also begin to express social emotions such as embarrassment, shame, guilt, and pride
start to react to environment around them, based on prior experiences and expectations
social acceptance and social status
why social isolation and unpopularity, or feeling lonely can be so deeply hurtful/painful
get along and get ahead
motivated to resolve external conflict (as well as internal conflict)
live and work together in complex social groups,
a survival tactic-banding together and working together
is that human beings evolved to live in social groups.
inherently social beings
actors in the everyday theatre of social life.
we each have specific "roles" to play in society and must abide by certain societal constructs to fulfill them
that important social role
interesting-characterizing as "social role" or a construct-not what is morally right, but what would be expected of ppl in society and a role to fulfill as a child- 1st self metaphor
to improve your appearance
for me, rings true-esp w/insecurities surrounding my appearance an increased usage of makeup
we often try to manage, discipline, refine, improve, or develop the self.
true for me-always reflecting on myself and how I can improve
the self is what happens when “I” reflects back upon “Me.” The self is both the I and the Me—it is the knower, and it is what the knower knows when the knower reflects upon itself. When you look back at yourself, what do you see?
relates to the third definition/metaphor for "self"
narrative identity
identity-a HUGE part of self and how you define it-also includes sociological factors
the age of 2 years
social acting-an inherent quality of humans then? if it emerges so young
Third, the self eventually becomes an autobiographical author, too, who takes stock of life — past, present, and future — to create a story about who I am, how I came to be, and where my life may be going.
this is the most "self-aware" self-in which the person reflects on their behavior and takes actions in their life deliberately to carve out the story they want to live. this relates to the second "self" as well, w/a more outward look (like the first "self")
the self is a motivated agent, who acts upon inner desires and formulates goals, values, and plans to guide behavior in the future.
I think this "self" is the dominant self in highly ambitious, but introverted people. They are the least distracted by what others do and more concentrated on their own goals and values. I think this is what characterizes independent, strong-willed people, and what most people would admire. Personally, I have found that being just this "self" can be lonely.
First, the self may be seen as a social actor, who enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others
this description-a "mask", not a true representation of "self" that most people would believe in. This "self" is most performative and thus the most "fake" in my opinion-most influenced by the external environment