but also nonhuman entities like rocks and bark, methods are significant and very much present in a research event.
curious, what does a multi-species study 'sound' like?
8 Matching Annotations
- Jul 2018
-
dfmi.dwrl.utexas.edu dfmi.dwrl.utexas.edu
-
-
dfmi.dwrl.utexas.edu dfmi.dwrl.utexas.edu
-
photographs
this section reminds me of the uproar concerning the separated Honduran child on the TIME magazine cover (thinking about how some (white conservatives/supremacists) dismissed the visual once they found out the child was "not separated" whereas the sounds of separation (7 min audio recording of paralyzing screams and tears) have received such an incensed reaction. If seeing (trauma) isn't believing, what does sound do affectively?
-
If we are immersed in theworldthrough bodilyexchangesofvariouskinds,ratherthanatadistancefrom `it' mediated only by language, the philosophicalquestion is recast inontologicalterms ± `how does the world make itself known?'
such an interesting question and one that is taken up time and time again in Qualitative Inquiry. Interesting to 'flatten' data into what MacLure calls a "glow" or what Merewether coins as a "murmur." A question I am interested in pursuing is what is data's ontology?
-
co-fabrication
in what ways is this similar to or different from the concept of meshwork and/or entanglement?
-
-
dfmi.dwrl.utexas.edu dfmi.dwrl.utexas.edu
-
Against method is not simply an academic stance.
...it is a political one (makes me think of Braidotti's framework for a 'critical posthumanities')
-
t seems to me, that what is at stake is the very redefi nition of knowledge, for what research-creation does is ask us to engage directly with a process that, in many cases, will not be or cannot be articulated in language
<3
-
we must become more attuned to how we are contributing to the creation of new orthodoxies in relation to what we understand experience to do.
...and be able to qualify our contribution in meaningful ways for P + T? (womp.womp.)
-
conduit for collective expression;
method as conduit for collective expression? do we think of method as form of rendering experience intelligible to others; or, to understand phenomena/experience ourselves?
-