and O(dr) inequalities,
Should it be O(d^2)?
14 Matching Annotations
- Mar 2025
-
lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch
-
-
lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch
-
with high probability
Some student asked why it is w.h.p. here. The proof only shows with constant probability
-
- Apr 2024
-
lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch
-
that is
The subscript for 0 \leq k seems to have some rendering issues.
-
that
The first term should be r^{(T)} and second term should be r^{(0)}, the brackets are missing
-
obtain that
The right hand side should be r^{(t-1)}
-
, it follows that
The square here is redundant
-
Part iii,
should be Part ii
-
g Part ii an
should be Part i
-
Show that
Missing subscript 2 for the right hand side.
-
-
lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch lecturenotes.cope.ethz.ch
-
conclude that
The first inequality should be geq. The second last term should be 1-4/500.
-
that
Missing ^* in the second term
-
Then
Missing ^* for the first term
-
it follows that
Extra lambda
-
that ⟨v^IT,x⟩2≥0.99.
Should it be x^*?
-