Paradoxically, this event has an unintended silver lining in the form of deterrence,”
in simpler words, let this be a lesson.
5 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
-
In the declaration Mr. Schwartz filed this week, he described how he had posed questions to ChatGPT, and each time it seemed to help with genuine case citations. He attached a printout of his colloquy with the bot, which shows it tossing out words like “sure” and “certainly!”
implying that no matter what you say to ChatGPT, the ai chatbot's goal is to make you feel fulfilled and satisfied. It will feed you affirmations and confirmations even if what you just said was completely wrong. You can test this yourself with questions that are open to discussions and debates with no "correct" answers.
-
Judge Castel gesticulated often in exasperation, his voice rising as he asked pointed questions. Repeatedly, the judge lifted both arms in the air, palms up, while asking Mr. Schwartz why he did not better check his work.
Judge Castel was clearly showing signs of annoyance and irritation with all the signs (gesticulating, his voice rising, etc...)
-
Mr. Schwartz sat slumped, his shoulders drooping and his head rising barely above the back of his chair.
Before the court hearing, he was cheerful and optimistic, but after the hearing he sat slumped, with his shoulders dropping and his head rising barely above the back of his chair, indicating that the hearing did not go well.
-
nervously upbeat, grinning while talking with his legal team
he was cheery and nervous at the same time, suggesting that he is trying to stay confident despite being anxious.
-