PET has been demonstrated to dissolve in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone and be re-precipitated in n-octane, but the researchers encountered challenges of high viscosity and low polymer concentrations (0.2 kg/L of solvent) along with high temperatures at 165 ℃. The resultant polymer was significantly less crystalline than virgin material but further recycling did not significantly affect the material’s properties14
Energy Consumption: The text notes that PET requires 165℃ for dissolution and PP needs 135℃. How do these high temperatures compare in energy cost to traditional mechanical recycling methods, such as melt reprocessing? Would this method be more or less energy-intensive on an industrial scale?