16 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. wash their children in the river as soon as they are born

      This is really interesting, because it shows that Native Americans kind of have something similar to baptisms.

    2. mortality but in our natality.

      When I first read this I thought it was a bit weird, however this is a bit close minded of me. This way of thinking perfectly ties into their belief of common pot, nature, as well as other cultural beliefs.

  2. Oct 2024
    1. amprey eel

      When people think of animals that are sacred to Native American tribes, most tend to think of bison, buffalo, or eagles. So it's really cool animals that I wouldn't think had cultural importance, played a much more important role.

    2. I d d " A d h me • Soh.d "I dreamed; of a wh1rlwm rea

      Compared to stories from Greek mythology and even the Bible, the act of dreaming isn't as important as it is to Native American mythology. So I wonder why was dreaming so important to Native American culture?

    3. These people will have good intentions

      In most creation stories I've read, they barely touch on the personality of the people that they're creating and if they did, they wouldn't have much of a personality at all. So it's interesting that this creation myth is putting emphasis on these people being good and having good intentions.

    1. resemble Polynesians,” not local Indians

      This argument is very similar to the phrase, "we're all immigrants from somewhere". Even though the evidence is literally staring at them in the face, people are stubborn. They don't care if the Kumeyaay are the rightful descendants, UCSD and by extension people in La Jolla, want what they want and they'll say whatever so that they get it.

    2. no link between the people buried there and the Kumeyaay.

      I agree with this because it's obvious that UCSD has little to no respect for the Kumeyaay, I mean they didn't even consult them when they were starting on the project in the first place. If they had it their way, they would gladly tear down the house without telling the tribe.

    3. cultural significance” in La Jolla history

      It's really ironic that they were so concerned about protecting something that they see to have cultural significance when they could care less about the importance the land has to the Kumeyaay. It just goes to show that it doesn't matter how many laws are passed to protect Native culture, history, and peoples. Native Americans will aways be treated as an after thought.

    1. archaeologists qualified to assess the value of these artifacts

      Even though their might be a possibility that they won't get much information, I don't see why they don't also consult the Kumeyaay tribe as well. If they're not sure, just like the tribes who were consulted to see the footprints in White Sands National Park, they'd probably be notified and possibly go see it.

    2. was infested with pests

      Wow UCSD really didn't care about their collection at all. It's almost like it was an after thought to them.

    3. were not bagged inplastic bags, but some were in paper bags

      This was really surprising to read because even though UCSD isn't really known for their anthropology or history department, I thought that they'd at least do the bare minimum to protecting these items. However, the fact they barely did anything to properly preserve them, shows that not even well reputed federal institutions can be entirely trusted to help preserve Native history.

    1. nor is it a sign of admirable “rigor” on the teacher’s part

      I absolutely agree with this because I've had plenty of teachers and Professors who prided themselves on not giving a lot a A's. This resulted in not only people stressing themselves out or people simply giving up on the class. Either way both parties barely remember any of the material when the semester or quarter ended.

    2. the best teachers

      I agree because I found out that when I had teachers or professors who had this attitude towards grading I realized that not only was I having more fun in the class, but I was also retaining information better.

    1. avens.1 By this time both she and her hubecome Christians, and were known in English as John and IsabThere they raised their children and three of their

      Even though 25 years seems like a long period of time, considering that the white settlers had already gotten this family to adopt white names and convert to their religion is really surprising and further highlights just how quickly the white settlers were moving to destroy Native influence and culture.

    2. s. If only they had given the body back to uswe could have given her a decent funeral," Grandma said. Theydidn't though

      To me this really shows just how inhumane these "relocation projects" were. Even though they just killed a women who obviously has a family, they could honestly care less. To them she's just another "savage" face who was in the way.

    3. This must have been heartbreaking for them, as this valleyhad always been their home.

      When we were all asked the question what does land mean to us, a lot of us saw it as home. The fact that these people were so easily removed from the land that was not only culturally significant and personally significant, really shows just how unstable the idea of home can idea and that makes it even more heartbreaking.