38 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2024
    1. activated when the invalidate_cache environment variable is set to False

      Some nice double negative naming conventions here!

    2. PowerPoint Document Issues:

      I wonder if we can tally the images and flag them somehow as problematic. Or potentially flatten/rasterize them?

  2. Feb 2022
    1. ng a 2 Year Fixed Options Home

      foo

    2. 4.94

      Too high

    3. this is ovcerall doc note

    4. inspecting potential properties. So, to get you into a new home sooner, we’d like to run

      this is reaalyu ricky

    Tags

    Annotators

  3. Jan 2022
    1. Chat

      Slack or Teams I wonder which is miore popular?

    2. Email and Chat tools (e.g. Teams, Slack)

      Do we need to develop out concersational style email reviews?

    3. Email and Chat

      Would be really interesting to see which chat platforms. Eg. Slack VS Teams. Could build out a review bot, similar to email in.

  4. Nov 2021
    1. xpanding the self-service aspect of the Red Marker platform

      Is there a way to develop a DSL for rule building.

      E.g. "If the word XYZ is mentioned, then ensure Disclaimer ABC is present on the same page".

    2. also adding a process for a scheduled code review (e.g., bi-weekly instead of prior to merge). This can be conducted either by the technical lead or peers and is performed outside the cycle of a deployment in their own time without the pressure of a production release

      I really like this idea, it would allow critique of design decisions and lead to better adherance to design/architecture without the time-pressure of feature delivery.

    3. Red Marker will benefit from a more formalised and structure governance process to ensure that the right knowledge is retained in a timely manner

      We need to put some better structure into the tech eval process and build / publish tools around the Documentation repo.

    4. Red Marker to conduct an independent Security Architecture Review

      Good idea, start with AWS well architected and discuss with other Pentetst companies. Was not overly imp

    5. performance data

      Not quite sure what they mean by "performance data"

    6. Work on the UI/UX of the current rule building solution to make it easier for customers to start doing some of this themselve

      Does this mean updating Minerva or the App rules? Minerva is almost impenetrable in its current form for non-expert users.

    7. artnerships across the ecosystem

      Should we identify what these partnerships are, or with who?

    8. currently being implemented

      Already live

    9. platform

      problem?

    10. platform

      problem?

    11. effect

      Effort?

    12. great learning on how to navigate the internal processes of large enterprise

      Agree!

    13. documenting the approach for open-source technology selection

      Does this mean creating a tech-eval guideline/process?

    14. Hiring tech lead / architect

      Could also be described as creating capacity for existing staff to focus on leadership or architecture

    Annotators

  5. Sep 2021
  6. Nov 2020
  7. Oct 2020