20 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
    1. We excluded studies from outside temperate regions and those with predation rate estimates based on fewer than 10 cats

      External factor that could have ben very detrimental -- important to address animal behavior

    2. We defined owned cats to include owned cats in both rural and urban areas that spend at least some time indoors and are also granted outdoor access. We defined un-owned cats to include all un-owned cats that spend all of their time outdoors.

      Definitions -- good to use for presentation

    3. his mortality is of particular concern within the context of steadily increasing populations of owned cats, the potential for increasing populations of un-owned cats12, and an increasing abundance of direct and indirect mortality sources that threaten wildlife in the United States and globally.

      Could be difficult to monitor as well because how can you tell if it's un-owned or owned? It's also so easy for a owned cat to run away and become a part of this system

    4. Population size estimates can be improved by incorporating observations of free-ranging cats into a wildlife mortality reporting database23.

      Good use of citizen data maybe? iNaturalist could help

    5. o precise estimate of the un-owned cat population exists for the United States because obtaining such an estimate is cost prohibitive

      Difficult to count -- ways to find approximate populations can help with doing the same in Africa with hippos and elephants etc

    6. However, studies of mammals in suburban and rural areas found that 75–100% of mammalian prey were native mice, shrews, voles, squirrels and rabbits26,30,31

      What other effects are there on the ecological systems? How will these change the ecosystems? Similar to compare to the gecko scenarios

    7. This estimated level of mortality could exceed any other direct source of anthropogenic mortality for small mammals;

      Huge impact -- this needs to be addressed as quickly as possible

    8. Systematic reviews like ours, which includes protocol formulation, a data search strategy, data inclusion criteria, data extraction and formal quantitative analyses22, are scarce for other anthropogenic mortality sources

      Highly systematic with many data tools -- good to prove credibility and have high replicability

    9. far exceeds any previously estimated US figure for cats

      Either a) this is indicative of a problem that no one has realized the extent of as of yet, or b) there could be discrepancies based on the variation discussed in the previous paragraph

    10. wild cat

      What is the difference between wild cats and domestic cats in terms of predation? Why are domestic cats such a threat? Do wild cats pose as much of a threat? Something to keep in mind for further research

    11. For birds, we generated three US mortality estimates based on predation data from studies in: (1) the United States, (2) the United States and Europe and (3) the United States, Europe, and other temperate regions (primarily Australia and New Zealand).

      Different means by which they compare data -- good to know and shows an intensive amount of thought and detail

    12. data-driven systematic review of studies that estimate predation rates of owned and un-owned cats, and estimated the magnitude of bird and mammal mortality caused by all cats across the contiguous United States

      This is the object of study and way in which they're doing it

    13. policies for management of free-ranging cat populations and regulation of pet ownership behaviours are dictated by animal welfare issues rather than ecological impacts

      Why are they not focusing on ecological impacts? It's a trickle-down system where there are going to be ecological consequences