- Nov 2024
-
www.jstor.org www.jstor.org
-
Ecosystems are inherently difficult to define, sohabitat diversity (which has clearer boundaries) is often usedas a proxy (Gray 1997
Using habitat diversity as a proxy directly allows researchers to quantify and study ecosystems with more precise boundaries, aiding in systematic biodiversity assessments.
-
The next level of diversity, species or alpha diversity,can be defined as the number of species found within agiven are
Measuring alpha diversity directly shows how many species are present in a specific habitat, indicating the ecosystem's health.
-
Populations (or species) with highergenetic diversity tend to adapt more effectively to environmental change over ecological time-scales and thus avoidlocal extinction
Genetic diversity insights indirectly inform conservation policies by highlighting which populations may need protection due to lower adaptability.
-
Cuba. The lagoonforms a key nursery habitat for many species, including lemonsharks (Negaprion brevirostris), Caribbean spiny lobsters(Panulirus argus), and queen conch (Strombas gigas).Recently, the lagoon was included as part of a new marineprotected area (MPA), but much of the habitat has alreadyexperienced considerable anthropogenic disturbance and theMPA boundaries have yet to be estab
Increased human presence may contribute to indirect disturbances such as the introduction of invasive species or nutrient pollution, which affect native species and ecosystem dynamics.
-
d. We present the results from an assessment of theaquatic species diversity of a small (3 km2), shallow, mangrovefringed Bahamian lagoon (the North Sound) subject to ongoinganthropogenic dev
This development likely includes construction, land alteration, and infrastructure expansion that physically disrupts the lagoon's ecosystems.
-
-
wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
-
The results of this harvest program indicated that alligators can be hunted in asustainable manner if hunting is conducted after the hatch period and occurs in areas that primarily excludethe harvest of adult females, and strict law enforcement curbs illegal activities that negatively affectpopulation
This summarizes the study’s conclusion that with specific timing and location guidelines, alligator harvesting can be managed sustainably without impacting the population’s reproductive potential.
-
Strict enforcement of existing laws was a key factor responsiblefor the success of this harvest program
Law enforcement plays a crucial role in sustaining alligator populations by curbing illegal harvesting, highlighting the importance of regulation in wildlife conservation efforts.
-
Annual aerial alligator nest countsindicated a continual growth of the population, and over time harvested alligators maintained a constantaverage size
This shows that the alligator population not only remained stable but grew, suggesting that the harvesting approach allows for both population and individual size stability, key indicators of successful wildlife management.
-
Linearregression analyses revealed that body size‐class structure, based on overall average size and the percentageof animals harvested in the larger size classes was relatively stable.
Here, the stability of body size structure despite harvesting suggests that the management strategy effectively preserves the population balance, particularly in maintaining large-sized alligators over time.
-
Wecollected and analyzed harvest data for Louisiana alligators to determine the effects of harvest on thepopulation structure, focusing on the larger size classes (≥274 cm) of this slow‐growing species
This sentence highlights the primary objective of the study: understanding how alligator harvest impacts population structure, especially in terms of maintaining larger alligators. This sets the stage for conservation goals and sustainable harvesting.
-
- Oct 2024
-
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
These results suggest that even the absence of clear numerical trophic cascades, demographic rates of non-target species may be influenced by the removal of top predators.
The study’s findings indicate that the presence or absence of top predators can affect factors such as size and mortality rates of lower trophic level species, underscoring the nuanced dynamics of coral reef communities.
-
For example, when predatory fish are removed by fishing, demographic traits such as size and longevity may increase for non-targeted species in lower trophic levels because of reductions of predation intensity or predation risk.
This sentence articulates an important prediction regarding the ecological consequences of fishing on coral reef ecosystems, specifically concerning the demographic responses of non-targeted prey species following the removal of top predators.
-
Even though numerical trophic cascades are rare in marine systems, indirect effects on demography or life histories of prey species may occur, and such indirect effects may have strong impacts throughout the community.
This sentence highlights a critical aspect of ecological dynamics in marine systems, specifically within coral reefs. It acknowledges that while traditional models of trophic cascades—where predator removal leads to increased prey populations—are infrequent in marine environments, the indirect consequences of these changes can still significantly affect community structure and function.
-
. However, these effects are likely not restricted to changes in abundance or size, but may include changes in demography and life histories that are more difficult to detect, and yet may still strongly influence the ecology of these systems.
This sentence emphasizes the complexity of ecological impacts caused by fishing in coral reef ecosystems. While many studies have focused on the more apparent consequences of fishing—such as changes in the abundance and size of target fish species—the authors argue that the effects extend beyond these metrics.
-
Through detailed analyses of focal species, we found that size and longevity of a top predator were lower at fished Kiritimati than at unfished Palmyra.
This sentence highlights the key findings of the study regarding the impact of fishing on top predator species in two contrasting environments: Kiritimati, where human fishing activities are prevalent, and Palmyra, a protected area with no fishing.
-
- Sep 2024
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
Out of five male–male dyads with corresponding genetic data, the one dyad displaying attraction (M306/M310) also indicated third-order relatedness. These data are not sufficient to infer if the male–male proximity occurs by chance but suggests that if related males happen to reside near each other, they may have higher tolerance of each other.
This observation highlights the complex dynamics of male-male interactions among mountain lions, suggesting that relatedness might influence tolerance levels between males who share overlapping territories. However, the limited genetic relatedness observed, coupled with small sample sizes and the variability in data, points to the difficulty in drawing broad conclusions about male proximity and attraction solely based on genetics.
-
Our data supported the hypothesis that geographical distance between individuals correlated with their genetic distance. Individuals that were in proximity to each other were more related. Our data did not support the hypothesis that mountain lions with overlapping home ranges would be more related to each other.
This finding challenges the assumption that spatial proximity and home range overlap among mountain lions, indicating close genetic relationships. The study reveals that overlapping home ranges do not necessarily equate to higher genetic relatedness, suggesting that other ecological or social factors, such as territory size, resource availability, or mating strategies, might drive this.
-
Anderson et al. (1992) compared 16 mountain lion studies and eight documented home range overlap in males and a few studies attempted to quantify the overlap (Hopkins et al. 1986; Laing 1988; Hopkins 1989; Anderson et al. 1992). Although they occasionally provided information on dynamic interactions, male–male interactions were limited in occurrences and were typically treated as anecdotal or simply as exploratory in nature.
This quote highlights the challenges in studying dynamic interactions, particularly among male mountain lions, whose interactions are often infrequent and difficult to quantify. The limited occurrence and anecdotal nature of observed male–male interactions suggest that these behaviors are not well understood, pointing to a gap in research that could provide critical insights into the social dynamics of these solitary animals.
-
Historically, mountain lions were thought to regulate their population size based on a territorial system, involving mutual avoidance (Hornocker 1969, 1970; Seidensticker et al. 1973). Recently in California, Pierce et al. (2000) suggested that populations were not primarily limited by territoriality but by food availability.
This quote underscores a significant shift in understanding the factors that regulate mountain lion populations. While traditional views emphasized territorial behavior and mutual avoidance as primary mechanisms for population control, recent research suggests that food availability plays a more critical role.
-
-
link.springer.com link.springer.com
-
Yet phase shifts to monospecific coral assemblages have been less well documented.
This sentence highlights a significant gap in coral reef research, emphasizing that while shifts from coral-dominated to macrophyte-dominated reefs are well-studied, transitions to reefs dominated by a single coral species are not as extensively documented.
-
In all three locations, that species was found to be very rare, thus the small sample size.
The rarity of this coral species underscores its potential vulnerability, as well as the difficulty in obtaining robust datasets for comprehensive analysis. Small sample sizes can limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions, but they also emphasize the importance of protecting and studying these rare species, as they may offer critical insights into coral diversity, resilience, and adaptation.
-
hase-shifts that result in the overwhelming abundance of a single or few species of corals are rare, yet, with climate change and ocean acidification, it is possible for some species of corals to thrive in those conditions and capitalize on changing environmental conditions
While coral reefs are generally seen as highly vulnerable to warming oceans and acidification, some coral species might actually adapt and thrive in these altered conditions. This suggests that environmental stressors may create opportunities for certain "weedy" coral species to dominate, leading to phase shifts that could reduce overall biodiversity.
-
n 2015, another typhoon (Maysak) made a direct hit on Ulithi Atoll. In the places of its direct passage, Montipora, which is a very fragile and brittle coral, suffered significant damage, thus reducing its abundance. However, by 2019, it had recovered in most places.
This sentence highlights the vulnerability of Montipora corals to natural disturbances like typhoons, which temporarily reduce their dominance on affected reefs. While Montipora is resilient enough to recover after such events, as seen in the subsequent years, this emphasizes the complex dynamics between environmental stressors and coral ecosystems.
-
This monospecific type of reef lowers fish diversity and biomass, impacting both ecological integrity, and livelihoods of reef-dependent human communities.
This underscores the far-reaching consequences of the phase shift, emphasizing that changes in coral composition can ripple through the entire ecosystem. A decline in fish diversity weakens reef ecologically and has direct economic implications for communities that rely on these ecosystems for fishing and tourism.
-