I can very well see how this creates very common errors. If you test over and over again on the same experiment there is bound to be insufficient information that is given in the wrap up. Being on the same terms and studying information that was given in the beginning experiment's will cut down a lot on replication. One scientist might give facts about this species in this sample size but the other scientists that test the same sample size might have different ideas about the experiment and that's where communication comes into play, and they need to work together to come up with a conservation study that makes sense and isn't a biased replication.

The hypothesis is really what the whole experiment is based off of. Without the hypothesis being tested there isn't going to be a true experiment done. A hypothesis sets the ground for what is going to be tested and no matter the sample size they are all going to e tested in the same type of way. They are all going to be based off the hypothesis no matter the sample size plain and simple.

I believe this statement because even though conservation was a popular thing in the 80's and 90's there was no where near the technology then that there is today. They didn't have tools like conservationists have today so they couldn't do the research and the experiments as in depth as they can in todays age. The technology that is used today is progressing conservation in a crazy rapid pace. And it's improving the saving of species on the daily.

I feel as though even though lands are protected it is still very hard to meet these conservation goals because there could be large amount of species that might even be unknown to the area or just too many in general to be able to help every single one all at once. It takes time to find ways to save these species and it is not going to happen all at once and in just a couple of days. These things take a lot of time and funding and people power to get under control.

It is sometimes very hard to co-manage and both you and the manager be on the same page, but without cooperation between the two things will never succeed. It is very hard for things to get done if there is doubt all the time. With principles in place for effective conservation governance, things will be worked through and certain things will be worked through properly and jobs will get done without hesitation.

I can relate to this statement in a personal way because my grandfather owns a dairy farm and grows corn and every year there is new technology and new findings that can make the product stronger and stronger every year. The better the yield of a crop the more of that crop that is able to sell and available to the consumers. Without the technologies that have been created in todays age I do no think we would be able to keep up with consumer wants and needs, and evidently never have enough.

Increasing a population by 2-4 million people within the next 30 or so years means there is going to need to be a lot more agriculture to sustain the amount of people on earth. Whether it be crops, or timber there's no doubt going to be species that are in danger due to the rise in population. There isn't much we can do for that except prepare and try and come up with ways to smooth transition.

Due to the fact that demand for timber will always be on the increase, being that timber is used for hundreds of things in our economies, it is going to be very hard to try and control these plantations because without these plantations this world is going to be without a lot of its natural resources. We just need to find a way to balance out the two and make both work together.

An animal that I know is very prohibited to hunt and even a felony in the United States is Bald eagles. And this is why this part stood out to me because there are a lot of different animals that are not allowed to be hunted due to the fact that there species are in danger of becoming endangered.

This is a very important topic I feel because some endangered species might be very harmful to other endangered species so conserving some species might end up a threat to other species. Also some certain species might even be a threat to the environment. And we really don't need those kind of species around.

This I believe a major step towards re instating species that have been gone for some time. Instead of just trying to find ways to keep species alive we need to work towards making species stronger than ever, and grow in numbers and make them bigger and better then they have ever been before. We need to keep the species alive and thriving that we have now, and try and get the red zone species out of the red zone.

This is a very large number and in fact a scary number of species that are at risk of extinction, we really need to start looking at these numbers and find ways how we can slow these numbers of species headed toward extinction. We need to work together and stop this from happening.

If birds become to come extinct at a higher faster rate then flowering plants are in serious danger of extinction, we need to protect our birds and those birds will protect our flowers.

I strongly believe this because humans back then needed to hunt for their sources of food, so therefore all the large mammals were being killed to be used as food for usually large numbers of people.

This is very good news to hear because having safe havens for new generations of species to be re born and safe to grow rich and heavy.

This is very interesting news because if we know information about certain species like we do about the sugar maples we will be more aware of how rapidly the climate change is happening and when to know we are in grave danger.

This has always been a big problem. Like anything that's illegal people are going to break the rules and keep on doing it over and over again. These are high paying needs so people are going to keep doing and not care what the law says, they are just going to hope that they don't get caught.

The price of tropical game has gone way up and is much more expensive than it has ever been, the more money for rainforest kills is getting more and more people out hunting that sort of game. it is kind of upsetting that these species are becoming more and more hunted threatening extinction.

I feel as though this happens much more than we think. Natural disasters kill off human life, species of vegetation, animal life and much more. It is extremely hard for animals to find proper food sources in events such as floods, and other natural disasters due to the fact that most of the food sources are swept away.

This is a piece of life and the environment controls what happens not us, we can't possibly control or tell when i natural disaster is going to happen so I say it's just gods way of natural selection.

Is this meaning that the population of a species isn't getting out to find other populations so therefore the species can't grow. Is it kind of of an inbred species going on if they stick to the same population.

I agree with this statement because without management pollution and extinction is just gonna begin to go through the roof and with no management there is going to be no way to stop what is going on.

Throughout the time humans have been on this earth we have done a lot of things that have affected the world and its ecosystems very negatively. But throughout the years we have also learned a lot of ways to try and slow down the destruction we are causing on the world.

If seeds aren't dispersed throughout within the plants will have a hard time growing and the organisms will have a hard time pollinating.

I agree with this because its stated as facts jumping from chimps to humans that the tropical disforestation has a large part in the health in the world.

If seeds aren't dispersed throughout within the plants will have a hard time growing and the organisms will have a hard time pollinating.

This means that more species that come together and work with each other are necessity's for our ecosystem they are needed to keep some portions up and running.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10021-002-0150-4#:~:text=Organisms%20that%20actively%20move%20in,provide%20ecological%20memory%20(that%20is%2C

We need more things like this to explain to people what could happen if things continue to go on the way that they are let people know that it doesn't have to keep going the same way that it is.

This is the reason why farmers have to fertilize lands all the time because most land does not have enough nutrients within the soil to grow healthy plants and crops so adding certain types of fertilizers and nutrients to this soil enriches the soil to create a better product. This nutrients to soil ratio is done by a math equation by getting a soil sample and figuring out how much help the soil needs.

This is pretty much explaining the breakdown of different organisms creates a soil that is very rich and fertile and creates a good base for organism growth.

I agree with this statement if we didn't have the organisms doing exactly what they are supposed to in our ecosystem then we wouldn't be able to breathe we wouldn't be able to survive in this world. These organisms need to continue to do their jobs and work properly in order for us to keep moving along and living.

I completely agree with this statement over the years that i can remember i have realized how much things have changed in this world it is good and also scary.

I believe that this shows that things seriously need to change in these areas. 95% of forests lost is a horrible statistic and very scary thing.

scientific experiments are being done to analyze the differences in organisms

This has very direct meaning to biodiversity

This a very rich sentence with a lot of rich information.