I dont think I am a fan of this story telling way it is very simplistic and is telling you the story rather than showing you, I personally believe stories should be told orally verbally and shown textually

I feel that tension could even be even woven in easily into the story as, it is especially necessary when conducting something to have tension because something easily won is not won but rather given and is a forgetful feeling.

I like this quote as well because it is grounding to adhere ourselves to principles of benefiting and working for communities rather than working at them and making things we think would benefit them.

I find this one the most impactful in its wording that it directly calls some designers complicit or downright oppressive in their designs by participating and exploiting oppressive systems to their benefits

This makes sense especially with how we as students would inevitably try to complete the assignment without trying to follow the requirements as to make our life easier I liked this point.

This idea is also important in day to day academic life, as things make sense to you as the one in your head but we must be able to translate that into usability and understanding for others.

This made me start thinking about how these features are somewhat "hidden" to those who do not rely on these features, which makes me think how do we advertise it.

This is a very interesting take and very insightful to my thought process which opens up a lot of avenues of fixing my process of doing things in the design process by implementing this.

It is useful to be very careful in your wording and trying to use the most abstract or general or fact based language (even though sometimes being fact based can be biased) Even slight tonal undertones can affect answers.

Sometimes this is harder to infer when searching, therefore it is better to have personal experiences such as before delving into the problem design aspect which is where passion comes into play.

It is a sort of grounding of who this design is for i.e. you may like flashy lights but if you are trying to make an inclusive website that would be an infringement on the idea of inclusivity.

They are quite different n that, scenarios is the existence of a problem whereas use cases is an existence of a solution, relative to each other perhaps but not related I believe.

I personally feel that taste is more in the realm of appreciation for arts rather than, what you cook? but thats just my thinking process.

its true that many creatives are often starving artists or of that trope in their lifetime but after revered because they were apart of the culture and for the people, so it must always be about doing what you think is right but often times that is not supported.

I love this distinction made by the author because you truly do have to pick who to support and it should be the most marginalized, the ideology is leaning towards communism, in the sense that there are not exceedingly rich folk rather everyone is supported and i love that.

I think thats why wording is especially important I believe we can not name things problems and "solve" them because they truly do not get solved the symptoms are reduced but is the problem gone? no.

I really like this analogy that the author uses however, she barely skimpers on the surface, giving an example and really nailing on it would be more beneficial, for people that do not have lived experience of what this means they would not get it. Maintaining political power in times of turmoil is benefiting off the political climate to screen and subjugate those that look like the "Other" (Edward Said Orientalism) to harsh practices, such as muslims, brown people, POC.

Whilst I agree I also think we should think about technology in a holistic point of view, where this data can be recorded and sold to corporations to make more money based off your usage.

Most of the time, nowadays the justification is profit, often played off as changing accessibility, making the iphone not have a headphone jack making people buy new headphones and chargers.

I would eliminate the profit companies get from social medias, because capitalism shapes everything into being less creative and more like clones of apps that are popular such as reels and shorts being copies of tik tok scroll methos

The critical consumption of media has been reinforced and been given better grounds to be more critical , such as parasocial relationships and their effects.

This idea is propagated by the propaganda of the social medias created by the Other (Said, orientalism) that it is inferior because of the inferirorty of the Other in itself.

capitalism is all around in america because of consumerism, the marketing and social construction of the ideas of consumerism garner responses to inevitably boost uptake of production.

While having its upsides it also has its downsides in that the people shaming could have ulterior motives or bigoted motives in that they dislike something for the wrong reasons and hide it under the guise of their displeasure.

I think of public shaming as tool by the "people" as a collective against politicians and people in power, it is an effective tool especially if your mass shaming and or bring the shaming to them in real life.

It is very hard to do lower harassment on social media individually, maybe creator to audience but even then it’s hard to control people.

I believe the way social media is structured makes it so that harassment becomes hard NOT to do. Such as the way to comment and quote retweet on Twitter, or put someone’s post on insta stories. With larger audiences it becomes harder to not harass someone.

i think for this they need moderators to moderate their changes and approve them, though a lot of costs overall it is beneficial. or they can crowdsource people to be their own moderators.

I've done crowdsourcing in the ad-hoc type of way, which for example i created an edit of characters from a show and then from that people started to watch the niche show i edited.

i think support in regards to anything concerning with health, as their job requires a lot of impending strain. This may affect their physical and/or mental health immensely.

Taking pictures and videos that have strangers faces in them and posting them would be considered bad. An alternative is to be vigilant of NOT recording others and posting them without their consent if not possible then blurring out their faces.

I feel like it can be designed to be better for mental health however, they would lse money in doing so, so i think that most companies wont.

finding a community was good for my mental health as it gave me a place of belonging with no strings attached, however the negatives that come with the reliance and over use of the internet were very apparent on my mental health

Not at all honestly, there are too many grievances with creating a meme or trend, such as people might start hating on you or you get unwanted fame, and or the complete opposite effect some people might even forget you started it, such as Black tik tokers creating dance trends and then being forgotten when a famous usually white tik toker steals uses their dance without credit and makes it their thing

I have participated in making things go viral, such as memes and even trends in the way that i might retweet or recreate something on stories little things i see i copy in my own way sometimes or sometimes if i like it enough i will fully copy it

a cataclysmic effect of recommendation algorithm is its ability to enclose one into an echo chamber, no new ideas same regurgitated thinking over and over again. it rots ones minds and it often leads to bigoted issues, such as white supremacy.

However, he holds a racist system up, and his wealth came from a racist system so to say he has the ability to change that is true however he does not want to, it benefits him.

Design justice should be an integral part of the designing process of any product function or service. Maybe even asynchronous design justice process, such as reviews and feedback.

the idea itself is quite insane, because these devices require motion so setting an extra barrier for it to work making it only work on light colored motion is an extra step created and inefficient, which is the general consensus bigotry leads to inefficiency out of pure spite.

A lot, this is because the incentives to take information is so beneficial for companies and the fact that it can be easily done under the table.

Privacy is a fantasy sold to people social media sites will always take your information wether you consent or not. However they hide this fact under the guise of choice wether you want to share your information or not. This is not true because a lot of information can be taken from a simple picture you click

absolutely not, i believe that this would lead to more problems than anything. such as the outing of someones beliefs sexuality gender stances, etc. the drawbacks outweigh any advantages given to the people who's data is sought out.

what was surprising how much data can be assumed by the simple sliver hair strand of one single data piece, which is fascinating. However, i understood digital footprint to a eep extent because i am an avid user of a lot of social media websites

i agree with this way of thinking because rhe more you engage with a troll the more angry you will get because the more they will respond in unserious trolling manner which will enrage the person even more.

This was recently done but slightly different where a satirist bassam was brought for an interview on live with piers morgan, and where he repeats the opposition claims but in simpler terms to therefore genuinely make their claims sound even more absurd than it already is.

i feel as though this is a tactic deployed by influencers or anyone honestly to garner sympathy. pathological liars on the internet often use this tactic to cover up for their mistakes. And this tactic can increase the parasocialism felt by the influenced.

Personally i wouldn't care, if i was entertained, i would rather be infatuated with the reason of why she lied. It is interesting to see people lie for the online community to make a life story up just to entertain en masse.

Theres a term for that called parasocial relationship, it is where one party is say an influencer and the other is the influenced or follower. Its sort of like a parasitic relationship where the influencer survives based on the delusions of the follower. And the follower survives and lives based on the perceived actions and personality of the infuencer.

4chan was a very off brand website where everyone there was very edgy. Quite a few murder cases were solved with the help of 4chan users so it had its pros and cons.

This reminds me of. a case that interests me, a white photographer found a beautiful girl in Afghanistan while she was in school. He asked for her and in private took photos of her eyes and face, they blew up and got on the cover of vogue. However, the girl, shamima begam, had not given consent for that with the fact that in afghan culture it is impermissible to be with a man outside of the family alone. The man became renowned for the picture and shamima received no compensation, in fact since her face was so popular she was deported from Pakistan where she took refuge. Any sense of ethics would deplore this act by the man but alas, it was a terrible situation for shamima. I feel as though with ethics, there lies many factors and factors of balance that are missing. The man and shamima were not on equal footing at all, he was a white man with power, and she was a "subaltern".

I feel as though besides the automated data types it is very easy to manipulate the constraints for example a few examples of this would be age. I've seen people who are thirteen and under on twitter its very precarious to enforce too because how do we decide if this person is actually under 13 or not.

I personally believe its a learned trait of differentiating bots from "normal" users. It is accomplished by extensive use of the internet and social media platforms, one deciphers actions of users and may be able to differentiate bot from user. Such as maybe a normal user may not post regularly on the same time, and about the same topic. Normal users may forget to post or may not want to post a day or time

Theres also bots that keyword search on sites and reply to them, as the example of twitter bots replying to random tweets that include keywords. There are different types of keywords and bots, for example "essay bots" are bots that find tweets that say "My essay is due" and reply to them saying they can help. Another example are "insta bots" on twitter that search for tweets containing words such as "my insta/instagram account was banned" and they reply with malicious links under the guise of trying to help you.

through the deontology method you can perceive the situation through, you not caring about what your parent would think of you. Rather you want them to be taken care of. Or you ignore the consequences of not giving them a caretaker, in hopes to respect their wishes.

However true, a good chunk of conversations happening on twitter would usually not happen in real life. It is worth pointing out that twitter gives an even playing ground for opinions, such as regressed minorities having little repercussions for speaking their truth. Which in real life it is harder to do, maybe because of the other plethora of issues or lack of "importance" in debating a minuscule topic of issue.

It's not about any financial gain it's more-so of a vigilante way of thinking. As more things were uncovered (Her job, Other racist tweets.) at the time, the situation got more inflamed.