88 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2020
    1. A portion of the EE2 entering a woman's body through birth control pills is excreted in her urine and then carried through sewage treatment plants into bodies of water. Although only a tiny fraction of the EE2 in birth control pills ends up in bodies of water, the sweeping use of such pills allows EE2 to accumulate in concentrations capable of feminizing male fish, making EE2 a top EDC of concern for the public and a significant threat from an ecological perspective

      super relevant to what's happening today. Really sad that many women have to take birth control to feel secure, or for a multitude of other reasons. Even though it can help stop unwanted pregnancies, as well as with acne and period cramps, the bad side effects can be devastating. Marine wildlife are hurting because of this, but so are many women taking the pill. Some side effects include nausea, headaches, mood swings, depression, as well as a heightened risk of stroke in women who smoke.

    2. a counterpoint to the prevailing focus that environmental contaminants were of concern because of their potential carcinogenicity.

      Were these effects due to direct contamination of the Great Lakes? Or is it due to run off or other sources? Can run off cause disruption at this level?

    3. These and other known EDCs are, or have been, abundant in consumer products and are used frequently in industrial, agricultural, and pharmaceutical applications

      Really shows how serious this problem is. Not surprising that agriculture and pharmaceuticals play a large role, however, because many of those big companies are "too big to fail" so no repercussions are dealt out

    4. Over the past half-century, the concept of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has risen from total obscurity to become nearly a household term.

      super true. tried to do an experiment last year in neurobiology (covid stopped it) which looked at the devastating results of two forms of estrogen on marine wildlife!

    1. Conservation translocation consists of the movement and release of organisms for conservation reasons

      Is this done mainly for mating purposes to increase population?

    2. while studying genetic diversity is a valuable option to decipher long‐term evolutionary changes, epigenetic should be considered as an option to inform on short‐term/immediate responses to contemporaneous environmental changes.

      Short term responses seem just as important as the long-term ones that seem to be focused on more.

    3. We will specifically focus on DNA methylation since they are the most documented epigenetic marks so far and because more and more analytical and technical tools are being developed for studying DNA methylation patterns in natural populations

      I really agree with the author on this point. When researching for our projects, many studies said the same thing which made me focus more on DNA methylation as well

    4. As such, DNA methylation affects ecological and evolutionary processes at all biological levels, from individuals (phenotypic variation) to the ecosystem level (Latzel et al., 2013).

      Very interesting to think that DNA methylation can effect so many processes in our everyday life. Before this class, I never really thought about just how important the topic of DNA methylation is and why it's so important to study it

    5. Finally, the current era is referred as the sixth mass extinction of biodiversity on Earth for which anthropogenic impacts are largely responsible

      Never thought about this, but the current is really detrimental to our environment and the organisms who inhabit it.

  2. Sep 2020
    1. Other studies suggest that hyperleptinemia and hypertension may be reversed by dietary intervention with n−3 fatty acids79 and that altered behavioral responses can be reversed by pharmacologic manipulation of epigenetic status.8

      Like hearing about this side of it. I've heard a lot about how all things mentioned above, that offspring can't control, can have bad consequences. Never thought about how it can be reversed. Guess thats the main reason why the subject is correlated to plasticity

    2. Infants who are fed formula have a higher energy intake and, in gen-eral, greater early gain in body weight than breast-fed infants, and they appear to have a greater risk of obesity in later life,28 findings that suggest further complexity of the long-term ef-fects of prenatal and early-life nutrition

      Interesting to hear about the effects that formula has on the baby, both positive and negative. I feel like breast feeding is more heavily talked about and how important it is to build up baby's immune system?

    3. Maternal constraint is increased with short maternal stature, young or old maternal age, first pregnancy, or multiple pregnancy; in addition, the effects of unbalanced maternal diet or excessive maternal thinness or fatness inf lu-ence fetal nutrition in the absence of other dis-ease.

      Everything a mother does while baby is in utero affects the baby for the rest of their life.

    4. Slow growth in utero may be associated with increased al-location of nutrients to adipose tissue during development and may then result in accelerated weight gain during childhood,10,11

      I remember hearing about this in genetics class I think. It was a case study that I found super interesting. Really cool to see it talked about again

    5. many lines of evidence, including epidemiologic data and data from extensive clinical and experimental studies, indicate that early life events play a powerful role in inf luencing later susceptibility to certain chronic diseases.

      This reminds me of some information I've heard about specific races can eat more of specific foods because they have a higher tolerance to it while other races may develop chronic diseases. I remember talking about lactose, gluten, and even something in relation to grain. Not sure if it completely connects, but I was brought into that direction after reading this for sure!

  3. Aug 2020
    1. One such example isthe “phantom limb phenomenon”

      not 10000% sure how this connects to neural plasticity. From what it sounds like, it connects because when a limb has to be amputated, inputs are relayed to another region of neurons?

    2. For instance, when newlyhatched wood frog (Rana sylvetica) tadpoles are reared intanks containing the predatory larval dragonfly,Anax(con-fined in mesh cages so that they cannot kill the tadpoles),the tadpoles in the predator-filled tanks grow smaller thanthose in similar tanks without the caged predators.

      Would definitely love to hear more about this. I wonder if this change took place over multiple generations?

    3. polyphenisms

      two or more phenotypes produced by one genotype

      never knew that this was possible due to predators. Also super cool how this then leads to increased fitness.

    4. they allow one to compare research from different areas ofthe world and they enable genetic regulation to be studiedwithoutanymajorvariabilitycomingfromtheenvironment

      This is super important!! Something that often isn't really thought about but makes a huge difference.

    5. Rather, differentialgene expression became the dominant model.

      To me, this totally makes sense. Looking at gene expression, as opposed to the whole organism, is so much more calculated. The results found this way definitely offer so much insight into phenotypes, what genes only specific animals have, and so much more.

    6. Ecological developmental biology is the meeting of devel-opmental biology with the real world.

      This definition is very interesting to me! Can't connecting things to the "real world" be traced back to all kinds of biology?

  4. Apr 2020
    1. obsessive–compulsive and anxiety disorders.

      Wow! I never thought these would be thought of as being in the body's defense. I can see this a bit when thinking about anxiety happening because of our body's flight or fight response.

    2. An outbreak of 41 cases of TB occurred in a medium-sized community in British Columbia over a three-year period. The outbreak was investigated epidemiologically and genomically. Figure 1A provides the epidemic curve.

      Really relates to what's happening in the world right now. The figure, especially, stands out to me. Flattening the curve is something that is talked about daily by people around me and on the news. This figure looks very similar to the ones being shown now.

    3. Extrinsic causes of disease include infection, altered microbiomes, starvation and malnutrition, injuries, hypoxia, hypo- and hyperthermia, and exposure to noxious xenobiotics among others. Infectious diseases are a primary cause of category 1 diseases and offer one of the most striking examples of the impact of genomics on medicine.

      From this passage, I got that starvation and malnutrition can be the cause of infectious diseases. I would have never thought that!

    4. The diversity and metabolic phenotype of the microbiome changes over the human life cycle.

      Why does this happen? Does the change happen with different foods we eat, or with age? If anyone has any insight I would be interested to know about it!

    5. In particular, fetal phase, infancy and childhood are uniquely vulnerable to environmental forces as shown in a review of studies on the developmental origin of disease.

      This slightly reminds me of the article we read about urban evolution. Specifically, because environment was talked about heavily as affecting the humans, animals, and plants that live there.

    6. Evolutionary medicine views patients as individuals whose history has unfolded over the course of an entire life cycle

      I think this is a really good way to look at things, overall, as it seems easy for physicians to stop thinking of patients as an individual when seeing so many people daily.

    1. researchers would like to find DNA older than 11,000 years, and also acquire DNA from regions in northern South America and the Caribbean,

      Has this been done before? How do you go about doing this?

    2. This population likely didn’t spend too much time in North America, eventually finding their way into South America, while leaving no genetic trace of their journey—aside from this lone specimen in Lagoa Santa.

      Can this be inferred because of the same genetic markers talked about earlier in this paper?

    3. identified a previously unknown population with a distinctly Australasian genetic marker—a very surprising discovery. Found at the Lagoa Santa archaeological site, this individual lived around 10,400 years ago in what is now Brazil.

      Not sure how recent this was discovered but this paper was only from 2 years ago. One thing I love about science is that new things are still being discovered!

    4. “That’s something we’ve suspected due to the archaeological findings, but it’s fascinating to have it confirmed by the genetics,”

      I definitely agree to this. Super cool to have two different kinds of sciences to back your findings up! Makes it a lot more credible

    5. The close genetic similarity observed between some of the groups studied suggests rapid migratory speed through North and South America.

      Was wondering how these scientists knew that these groups were migrating. It makes sense that this is a way that they can know this

    6. From here, scientists assumed that, as populations moved southward, some groups split off, never to meet again.

      We have talked about different species doing this in class and becoming completely different from each other

    1. A key question in urban evolutionary biology iswhether populations adapt to urban environ-ments.

      definitely what I have been wondering the entire time while reading

    2. For ex-ample, populations of white-footed mice in NewYork City (NYC), United States, became rapidlydifferentiated from one another once popula-tions that existed beforeurbanization were iso-lated in parks (41).

      would like to learn why this happens. Seems like it would happen due to fitness but it's not completely explained?

    3. Rapid adaptation has facilitated the success of some native species in urban areas,but it has also allowed human pests and disease to spread more rapidly.

      Super true. We can see this with the current situation of covid-19. The state that has the most cases in the US is NY. It makes sense when considering the fact that NYC is the most populated city in the united states

    4. The study of urban evolution hasrapidly become an important frontier in biology,with implications for healthy and sustainablehuman populations in urban ecosystems.

      Super cool! Living in a city myself, I know a lot of people who suffer with different pests problems because of the amount of people living in such a small area, as well as the general dirtiness that comes with a city.

    5. Both scenar-ios frequently result in a loss of genetic diversitywithin populations and increased differentiationbetween populations.

      I would think this would be the opposite! Maybe because I'm thinking about humans specifically

    6. Ur-ban areas also host more non-native speciesand reduced abundance and diversity of manynative species.

      This is super interesting to me and not something that I thought would be the case! Definitely going to look more into why this happens because of urban environments

  5. Mar 2020
    1. and genes for the preference for large ornaments from the mother

      Never thought about this either! Would makes sense that this would be passed down. Super cool

    2. These systems are especially perplexing from a sexual selection standpoint because the benefits of choice are not at all obvious.

      So interesting to me! I always thought the more elaborate ornaments showed that an individual is the more fit in a species but it turns out the two can often be separate ideas.

    3. he assumes a population with 2 types of females: “the more vigorous and better-nourished individuals” and “the less vigorous and healthy”

      Whenever I would think about sexual selection, I would only really think about males having to fight or show who is the most fit but I usually never think about the fact that females also can be more or less fit than others of the same species around them

    4. However, Darwin also clearly appreciated that different spe cies could possess different standards of beauty, explaining why not all sexually selected traits appear attractive to us.

      Very cool and interesting to think about. Different species look for different things in a mate that can show fitness

    5. Sexual selection as a consequence of female choice is easy to understand, provided we are willing to accept that female preferences exist.

      Very interesting thought preference solely exists when it relates to picking the mate that is the most fit in wildlife animals

    6. intrasexual and intersexual selection,

      intrasexual: he within-sex component of the broader process of sexual selection

      intersexual: competition with members of the same sex.

    7. “sexual selection arises from differences in reproductive success caused by competition for access to mates”

      Good. overarching definition that brings many ideas together on the topic

    8. First, why does mate choice evolve at all? And second, what factors determine the strength of mate choice (or intensity of sexual selection) in each sex?

      The questions being focused on in this study

    1. We also manipulated androgen levels throughout life by treating males with testosterone or antiandrogen compounds.

      Preview of methods they used to answer their research question

  6. Feb 2020
    1. kept it covered up in my study for six months, pulling up and counting each plant as it grew; the plants were of many kinds, and were altogether 537 in number; and yet the viscid mud was all contained in a breakfast cup!

      How so many species can fit in such a small space, like a breakfast cup

    2. Both in time and space species and groups of species have their points of maximum development.

      Does this mean that if a species have reached maximum development any development after will be bad?

    3. and remember that some forms of life have changed very slowly, enormous periods of time having been thus granted for their migration,

      Migration can take a super long time, not something I've thought about before

    4. two varieties of the same species inhabit America and Europe, and thus the species has an immense range; but, if variation were to be carried a little further, the two varieties would be ranked as distinct species, and their range would be greatly reduced

      To me this means that if the species had more variation, they would be considered different and their range would be smaller because of the fact that they would only be found at one location

    5. In the Galapagos Archipelago, many even of the birds, though so well adapted for flying from island to island, differ on the different islands; thus there are three closely allied species of mocking-thrush, each confined to its own island.

      I took this as meaning that even though species at different locations appear to be the same, they are different to accommodate the environment they inhabit

    6. Some species, however, might spread and yet retain the same character throughout the group, just as we see some species spreading widely throughout a continent and remaining the same.

      his explanation of this is very riveting. I never thought about this before

    7. Thus each separate island of the Galapagos Archipelago is tenanted, and the fact is a marvellous one, by many distinct species; but these species are related to each other in a very much closer manner than to the inhabitants of the American continent, or of any other quarter of the world.

      This makes sense to me due to the fact that the Galapagos is more remote than the Americas

    8. On the other hand, there is a considerable degree of resemblance in the volcanic nature of the soil, in the climate, height, and size of the islands, between the Galapagos and Cape Verde Archipelagos: but what an entire and absolute difference in their inhabitants! The inhabitants of the Cape Verde Islands are related to those of Africa, like those of the Galapagos to America.

      Never thought that inhabitants could make an environment inhabitable for a species

    9. As the amount of modification which animals of all kinds undergo partly depends on the lapse of time, and as the islands which are separated from each other, or from the mainland, by shallow channels, are more likely to have been continuously united within a recent period than the islands separated by deeper channels, we can understand how it is that a relation exists between the depth of the sea separating two mammalian faunas, and the degree of their affinity, a relation which is quite inexplicable on the theory of independent acts of creation.

      Another explanation for why some species can be found in two different places and why some from other places arent. Makes sense

    10. Hence, we have only to suppose that such wandering species have been modified in their new homes in relation to their new position, and we can understand the presence of endemic bats on oceanic islands, with the absence of all other terrestrial mammals.

      So because they're able to travel so far, it's easier for them to adapt to their new environments

    11. Why, it may be asked, has the supposed creative force produced bats and no other mammals on remote islands? On my view this question can easily be answered; for no terrestrial mammal can be transported across a wide space of sea, but bats can fly across.

      Totally makes sense!

    12. Although terrestrial mammals do not occur on oceanic islands, aerial mammals do occur on almost every island.

      Answers my last question about mammals. There just aren't ALL kinds of mammals

    13. This general absence of frogs, toads and newts on so many true oceanic islands cannot be accounted for by their physical conditions; indeed it seems that islands are peculiarly fitted for these animals; for frogs have been introduced into Madeira, the Azores, and Mauritius, and have multiplied so as to become a nuisance. But as these animals and their spawn are immediately killed (with the exception, as far as known, of one Indian species) by sea-water, there would be great difficulty in their transportal across the sea, and therefore we can see why they do not exist on strictly oceanic islands. But why, on the theory of creation, they should not have been created there, it would be very difficult to explain.

      super interesting thought process!!! If this environment is perfect for these animals, it doesn't make sense why they aren't naturally occurring there

    14. For instance, in certain islands not tenanted by a single mammal,

      how does it not hurt the population when there isn't a single mammal found in the environment?

    15. It should be borne in mind that the offspring of such crosses would certainly gain in vigour; so that even an occasional cross would produce more effect than might have been anticipated

      natural selection in effect

    16. Although in oceanic islands the species are few in number, the proportion of endemic kinds (i.e. those found nowhere else in the world) is often extremely large.

      very interesting to think while there aren't many species found in these places, these places are also home to one of a kind species. How does this happen?

    17. But the wide distribution of fresh-water plants, and of the lower animals, whether retaining the same identical form, or in some degree modified, apparently depends in main part on the wide dispersal of their seeds and eggs by animals, more especially by fresh-water birds, which have great powers of flight, and naturally travel from one piece of water to anoth

      species can distribute other species to different parts of the world or country. Is this good for evolution? what happens if the species can adapt to its new climate/environment?

    18. Ancylus (a fresh-water shell like a limpet) firmly adhering to it; and a water-beetle of the same family, a Colymbetes, once flew on board the "Beagle," when forty-five miles distant from the nearest land: how much farther it might have been blown by a favouring gale no one can tell.

      is this a mutually beneficial relationship between the species? why are either benefitting from this?

    19. so that a marine species belonging to a fresh-water group might travel far along the shores of the sea, and could, it is probable, become adapted without much difficulty to the fresh waters of a distant land.

      cool how fish can adapt. I wonder how long this takes and if ALL fish do it, or if it's a matter of natural selection

    20. having the power of crossing by some unknown means considerable spaces of open ocean: thus there is one species common to New Zealand and to the Auckland Islands

      also very interesting to think that the same species can be found in very different locations; and explains why this could be

    21. But the wide ranging power of fresh-water productions can, I think, in most cases be explained by their having become fitted, in a manner highly useful to them, for short and frequent migrations from pond to pond, or from stream to stream, within their own countries;

      explains why there might be such variety

    22. Not only have many fresh-water species, belonging to different classes, an enormous range, but allied species prevail in a remarkable manner throughout the world. When first collecting in the fresh waters of Brazil, I well remember feeling much surprise at the similarity of the fresh-water insects, shells, etc., and at the dissimilarity of the surrounding terrestrial beings, compared with those of Britain.

      Really interesting to think about the wide variety of organisms that can be found in a small area

  7. Jan 2020
    1. I think essays like this are really important to put into context just how important evolution really is. It's common for people to believe that it is a standalone area of work. In reality, it can be linked to a huge number of research that is still relevant to this day.

    2. Understanding the diversification of species and the origin of adaptations poses a number of challenges for evolutionary biologists,

      Even though this has a lot of challenges, I think it will be very worth it in the long run and will be something that will help for years and years to come

    3. Studies of the biodiversity of Bacteria and Archaea are complicated by the widespread occurrence of lateral gene transfer.

      Lateral gene transfer is something that I want to learn more about, not really sure what it means in context

    4. In particular, engineering and design processes have incorporated evolutionary computation, leading to improvements in design of cars, bridges, traffic systems robots, and wind turbine energy, among other applications [55]–[59].

      Definitely something I didn't know before! This is super cool and an area of evolution that I would for sure want to learn more about.

    5. In addition, some age-related conditions, such as cancer, can be understood as the outcome of selection for early reproduction, when humans faced dying of disease or predation at an early age.

      This connection between diseases and evolution is a bit harder for me to understand. Is the article saying that these diseases are a form of population control that has developed?

    6. The new field of “evolutionary medicine" [24]–[26] posits that understanding our evolutionary past can inform us of the causes of perplexing common diseases. F

      Medicine is the area of evolution I'm most excited to learn about, because I want to pursue a career in medicine once I am done with undergrad.

    7. Much human activity, however, is changing Earth's climate and habitats, with uncertain but potentially severe environmental stresses on many other species [15]–[18], and the solutions to the many resulting problems may well require understanding evolutionary interactions among species and their mutual dependencies.

      This point is very interesting to me. I knew that the things humans were doing has been causing the Earth's climate and habitats to have environmental stresses but I never thought that evolution would be a subject area scientists thought to look at to try and fix this.