model 1-to-many relations
How does this look in Tableau?
model 1-to-many relations
How does this look in Tableau?
results that told a story
I can't wait to see a bit of the story in your final iteration!
coding scheme,
Did the coding scheme of Palladio help you realize the gaps in ANNO's built in text reader? Or was it your own realization that happened external to working with the program?
“clusters” are supposed to say to me… any ideas?
Are the color chunks like best fit lines? I agree with you that this output isn't legible, it is beautiful though.
The interface was user-friendly and offered quick, polished-looking results — it definitely felt significantly less frustrating than Palladio.
Why was it less frustrating than Palladio? I think this is important to consider as it can help you better identify what didn't work in palladio as a tool.
drastically changed the original capta I collected in Airtable
When you moved from Airtable to excel did this artifact still occur?
listen
Cool video, I did enjoy the portion about realizing Palladio was not the tool for the current moment but may be a tool that works after additional data winnowing/altering.
I think what type of things I tell my students to engage with on their own is really important, because that structures how I move students through the subject matter of the course,
Its also potentially worthwhile to consider the different pedagogical methods professors use to assign work. 1. I've never had a class where the syllabus readings remained the same throughout the course, 2. I am currently in a geology course that assigns 15 papers of reading a week via powerpoint slide rather than listing those works in a syllabus. I know you have probably already though through all of this so maybe this is just me struggling with what I think syllabi do!
I keep jumping around to comment so below you had mentioned potentially reorganizing your categories. Would it be useful to categorize your syllabi based on the career progression of the individuals making them? This is likely my own assumption but I feel as though early career academics and tenured academics might cite differently (e.g. some people don't update syllabi).
too many authors
This is also a useful observation though! If there are too many authors that potentially indicates a greater heterogeneity of authors as canon/foundational works.
I doubt this will end up being “the useful network,” but it seemed like the most useful simple network to start with because it still gave a sense of who is “citing” who/what.
This reminds me of the Sandcastles paper, just because the visualization is not useful to a broad audience doesn't mean its not worth making and breaking.
replicable across contexts,
So is this a project you would want to apply to other archives? How would your process change based on the poet or style of poetry?
i.e., Eigner could only type with his right pointer finger—thus, the shapes of his poems are not a mere formalistic/structural choice, but the literal result of how his body moved and was able to move
This is a really interesting tidbit about Larry, I wonder how it would feel to recreate his poetry using just a finger.
make this project replicable by and useful to people other than me.
You had mentioned you had to catch back up on the differences in the language you were used to coding in. Is making this replicable possible with the current state of the code? Can it be updated?
to deal with Eigner’s poems at all is to dig.
I can feel this, reconstructing context is hard.
embodiment
So for this are you also recording your experiences reading the poem, doing close reading, etc. I know that close reading can sometimes create an emotional distance when reading a poem.