56 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2022
    1. How do we stand on the dead and smile? I carry so many black souls in my skin, sometimes I swear it vibrates, like a tuning fork when struck.

      "Vibrates" really struck me because I normally encounter that word in science textbooks and occult texts, specifically the Kybalion. But Clark's line reminds me most of Ashon Crawley's work in black feminist studies and his assertion that "Because everything vibrates, nothing escapes participating in choreographic encounters with the rest of the living world." This resonates strongly with Clark's assertion, "sometimes I swear it vibrates." Her skin holds "so many black souls," which are not alive but they still vibrate through her skin. This vibration refuses her husband's white mother's insistence that the land could be redeemed, as these "black souls" still have an effect on the world and are received and held by others.

    2. he said we could redeem the land with our picture— my brown skin acrostic to the row of their white.

      "Our" makes me wonder who owns the picture and what the picture is of? "my brown skin acrostic to the row of their white" answers this question by refusing to be used to redeem or resolve the land of its history, but also not dismissing the land altogether

  2. Mar 2022
    1. for sale like sheep or cattle,

      Mary is treated "like" livestock, but she and the men bidding on her are aware she is not livestock, just as the men are aware they are not butchers, though they "examined and handled me in the same manner that a butcher would a calf or lamb he was about to purchase." It is "as if" she is an animal, yet they are fully aware she is not. This highlights how she is dehumanised by humiliating her as a human, and in part recognising her humanity.

    2. The idea of being sold away from my mother and Miss Betsey was so frightful, that I dared not trust myself to think about it. We had been bought of Mr. Myners, as I have mentioned, by Miss Betsey’s grandfather, and given to her, so that we were by right her property, and I never thought we should be separated or sold away from it.

      A lot of her safety is derived from maternal figures which is entangled with property laws

    3. My obedience to her commands was cheerfully given: it sprung solely from the affection I felt for her, and not from fear of the power which the white people’s law had given her over me.

      Mary's insistence that she felt affection rather than fear of her mistress denies her mistress' power over her in more ways than one...But she is not necessarily denying "fear of the power which the white people's law had given her over me"

    4. I was made quite a pet of by Miss Betsey, and loved her very much.

      Mary Prince is narrating this in hindsight but she still upholds the love she has for Miss Betsey. She is making a distinction between being treated like a "pet" by Miss Betsey and her understanding (at the time) of her "condition as a slave"

    1. Authority seizes upon specifi c material qualities of the fl esh, particularly the genitals, as outward indication of future reproductive potential, constructs this fl esh as a sign, and reads it to enculturate the bod

      ..

    2. You see, I told myself, wiping snot off my face with a shirt sleeve, bodies are rendered meaningful only through some culturally and historically specifi c mode of grasping their physicality that transforms the fl esh into a useful artifact

      ,,

    3. h e monster accomplishes this resistance by mastering language in order to claim a position as a speaking subject and enact verbally the very subjectivity denied it in the specular realm

      .

    4. Peter Brooks suggests that, whatever else a monster might be, it “may also be that which eludes gender defi nition” (219).

      the monstrous lesbian

    5. Filisa Vistima was not a boy, and she found it impossible to take care of herself. Even in death she found no support from the community in which she claimed membership. “Why didn’t Filisa commit herself for psychiatric care?” asked a columnist in the Seattle Gay News. “Why didn’t Filisa demand her civil rights?” In this case, not only did the angry villagers hound their monster to the edge of town, they reproached her for being vulnerable to the torches. Did Filisa Vistima commit suicide, or did the queer community of Seattle kill her?

      proximity to death

    Annotators

    Annotators

  3. Feb 2022
    1. but the parents continue in a state of slavery as long as they live. In observing these slaves, we behold at once, in their countenance and manners, the striking contrast betwixt a state of freedom and slavery.

      If the enslaved people were "taken...when young" but their children do not inherit their state of slavery, what happens when the parents die? Is slavery a part of this town's longevity? There is no sense of a lifeline for enslaved people.

    2. at length, a silver thread alone encircled her temples: at this boding change, an universal silence prevailed.

      This "universal silence" arises from the moon, which he genders. Again he uses sex to universalize differences

    3. Can it be denied, but that the moral principle, which directs the savages to virtuous and praiseworthy actions, is natural or innate?

      He switches from the "essential principle" guiding animals/plants to the "moral principle" guiding Indigenous people...The problem isn't a lack of reason or intent, but the intent and design of indigenous people.

    4. “White man, thou art my enemy, and thou and thy brethren may have killed mine; yet it may not be so, and even were that the case, thou art now alone, and in my power. Live; the Great Spirit forbids me to touch thy life; go to thy brethren, tell them thou sawest an Indian in the forests, who knew how to be humane and compassionate.”

      Did he say this or is this Bartram's decipherment of "the silent language of his soul?

    5. This harmony, with the tender solicitude of the male, alleviates the toils, cares, and distresses of the female, consoles her in solitary retirement whilst sitting, and animates her with affection and attachment to himself in preference to any other

      The language of birds is structured through male/female binary

    6. I soon noticed that the object of his wishes was a large fat bomble bee (apis bombylicus), that was visiting the flowers, and piercing their nectariferous tubes

      Free will/purposeful action seems to emerge in relation to prey

    7. I term it a forest, because their scapes or flower-stems arose erect near 30 feet high)

      It is interesting how he switches back and forth between classifying nature through technical measurements and universalizing nature through some "essential principle"

    8. We gained gradually on our prey by this artifice, without their noticing us

      Artifice is referenced in connection to "the reason of man," thus what makes man superior to animals. However, Bartram undermines this hierarchy by shifting to the empathy he feels for the animals. He is able to universalize his connection to the animals through the familial ties between mother and child.

    9. this we term instinct, which faculty we suppose to be inferior to reason in man.

      Animals are inferior to mankind (as representative of humankind, calling back to Sylvia Wynter) due to their lack of intent/reason. It is interesting how free will is being used to justify and dignify their lives

    10. the cause is invisible, incomprehensible; how can it be otherwise? when we cannot see the end or origin of a nerve or vein, while the divisibility of matter or fluid, is infinite.

      Because Bartram is not able to see this "essential principle," he cannot trace its origins or measure it in time. He names God as the cause of "the inimitable machines." The animals are too distinct to be imitated (by humans? or productions of humans?) but also universalized under God through some essence.

    11. Let us begin at the source of terrestrial existence. Are not the seeds of vegetables, and the eggs of oviparous animals fecundated, or influenced with the vivific principle of life, through the approximation and intimacy of the sexes?

      He traces the source of life on Earth back to sex, something that is both unifying and key to understanding the "essential difference" between animals and plants

    12. is it sense or instinct that influences their actions? it must be some impulse; or does the hand of the Almighty act and perform this work in our sight?

      His questions are very suggestive and they set up an opposition between "sense" and "instinct." However this seems to be resolved through a greater gopposition between "some impulse" or "the hand of the Almighty"

    13. motion and volition.

      His descriptions of the plants are very dynamic and animating, seems like he is drawing connection between being alive and having free will?

    1. The Indians returning from Northampton, brought with them some horses, and sheep, and other things which they had taken; I desired them that they would carry me to Albany upon one of those horses, and sell me for powder: for so they had sometimes discoursed. I was utterly hopeless of getting home on foot, the way that I came. I could hardly bear to think of the many weary steps I had taken, to come to this place.

      The lack of names or specification when she refers to the indigenous people makes it hard to decipher who is actually leading the group

    2. e both fell over the horse’s head, at which they, like inhumane creatures, laughed, and rejoiced to see it,

      "Like inhumane creatures" is ambiguous because you could read it as both a recognition of their humanity and subsequent scolding of their character for not behaving like humans. Also interesting that their humanity is measured by their reaction to white mother and child being harmed

    3. which they had plundered in the town

      What is the reason for all these parentheticals? So far it seems like she uses them to add more specifics and to preface her more opinionated/personal remarks

    4. Written by her own hand for her private use, and now made public at the earnest desire of some friends, and for the benefit of the afflicted

      Similar to Sloane, there is a emphasis on the first-hand account and proving the authenticity of narrative

    1. How can narrative embody life in words and at the same time respect what we cannot know? How does one listen for the groans and cries, the undecipherable songs, the crackle of fire in the cane fields, the laments for the dead, and the shouts of victory, and then assign words to all of it? Is it possible to construct a story from “the locus of impossible speech” or resurrect lives from the ruins?8 Can beauty provide an antidote to dishonor, and love a way to “exhume buried cries” and reanimate the dead?9

      Hartman is asking a question about not only the impossibility to portray an accurate account of history but also the limits of language to fully capture an experience. She is also asking about the intentions of going into the archives: for what purpose and who does it serve

    2. The intention here isn’t anything as miraculous as recovering the lives of the enslaved or redeeming the dead, but rather laboring to paint as full a picture of the lives of the captives as possible. This double gesture can be described as straining against the limits of the archive to write a cultural history of the captive, and, at the same time, enacting the impossibility of representing the lives of the captives precisely through the process of narration.

      This seems to be an important part of what Hartman calls"critical fabulation." She is not excavating the truth of what happened or recovering anybody as a historical figure but instead complicating the archives by bringing life into it

    3. exploiting the capacities of the subjunctive (a grammatical mood that expresses doubts, wishes, and possibilities)

      Hartman connects the subjunctive to"what could have been," also as way to question what has been written

    4. I could say after a famous philosopher that what we know of Venus in her many guises amounts to “little more than a register of her encounter with power” and that it provides “a meager sketch of her existence.”

      Why does Hartman refer to him not by his name and instead as a "famous philosopher"? Is this related to what she means by "the essay mimes the violence of the archive"?

    1. A ship moving through water generates a particular pattern of waves; the bow wave is in front of the ship, and that wave then spreads out in the recognizable V pattern on either side of and then behind the ship. The size of the bow wave dictates how far out the wake starts. Waves that occur in the wake of the ship move at the same speed as the ship. From at least the sixteenth century onward, a major part of the ocean engineering of ships has been to minimize the bow wave and therefore to minimize the wake. But the effect of trauma is the opposite. It is to make maximal the wake. The transverse waves are those waves that run through the back; they are perpendicular to the direction of the motion of the ship. Transverse waves look straight but are actually arcs of a circle. And every time, every instant that the boat is moving through water it has the potential to generate a new wave.

      Sharpe uses metaphors throughout her writing, demonstrates how metaphors and language correspond to material action and energy

    2. The Wheatleys made an experiment of her. They allowed and encouraged this Phillis, child of a “bitterly anonymous man and a woman,” to “develop,” to become literate, to write poetry, to become “the first Black human being to be published in America”

      Her literacy and allowance from a white married couple are linked to her humanity

    3. It requires theorizing the multiple meanings of that abjection through inhabitation, that is, through living them in and as consciousness.

      Sharpe making implicit argument that theory/language is embodied and experienced materially

    4. One might say that Aereile Jackson is the film’s insurance—as she lends the film its vocabulary and her abjection underwrites its circulation (figure 2.4).

      What is being insured?

    5. the abjection, by, on, through, which the system reimagines and reconstitutes itself.

      The system is reliant on the "abjection" in order to function and articulate its meaning

    6. The violence against her is (in Wilderson’s terms) not contingent, it is not violence that occurs between subjects at the level of conflict; it is gratuitous violence that occurs at the level of a structure that constitutes the Black as the constitutive outside. Put another way, the fact and the mode of the inclusion and display of Ms. Jackson’s body and speech are indicative of how the film cannot understand the enactments of a language of gratuitous violence against the Black.

      Blackness is an index of the outside, Ms. Jackson is used to signal and embody the outside or abjection

    1. I told him in short that he was a Dissembler, bid him go and do his business without any more ado, or else he should have due Correction, which was the best Remedy I knew for him, he went about his Errand immediately, and perform’d it well, though he came too late for the Pirats.

      Sloane presents himself as the authority figure here, who is able to discern, or rather, determine fact from fiction. Whether or not Emanuel faked his illness, it is an indication of his will and a subtle rejection of his role as a footman. The remedy Sloane makes up for Emanuel's illness is essentially a punishment.

    2. The Europeans who stood by thought him dead, Blacks thought him bewitch’d, and others were of opinion that he was poyson’d. I examin’d matters as nicely as I could, concluded that this was a new strange Disease, such as I had never seen, or was not mention’d by any Author I had read, or that he Counterfeited it.

      "The Europeans who stood by" and "others," whoever they may be, believe Emanuel is dead or will be dead soon while "Blacks thought him bewitch'd." The word bewitched could imply Emanuel is possessed by something or possesses something fantastical. It also recognises Emanuel's life and autonomy.

    3. Columbus took the advantage of an Eclipse was to be the next night, viz. the 29th of February, 1504. He told them the God of the Christians was angry with them, and would send them Pestilence and Famine, if they did not relieve his Men. As a sign of the truth of it, next night they should see the Moon eclipsed.

      This is a clear example of how Columbus used nature to manifest his power over the indigenous people. It is also an example of how Sloane reinforces Columbus' power when reinscribing this story.

    4. It has puzzl’d the Philosophers of all Ages, to give an Account how Parts of Vegetables and Animals, Real Sea-Shells and Substances should be found remote from the Seas, wherein they seem to have been produced and bred.

      Sloane brings up a dilemma with things that are not in their natural environment, which he later calls the "natural place of their production and increase." The problem is how to account for the origins of these things.

    5. he Acquiesc’d in the Ecclesiastical History, Doubted the Civil, and Believ’d the Natural.

      The natural is taken to be "matters of fact." This requires faith in the natural and the observer's account of it as the truth or close to the truth.