72 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2019
    1. One issue that is of major concern to us and that we have begun to publicly address is racism in the white women’s movement. As Black feminists we are made constantly and painfully aware of how little effort white women have made to understand and combat their racism, which requires among other things that they have a more than superficial comprehension of race, color, and Black history and culture. Eliminating racism in the white women’s movement is by definition work for white women to do, but we will continue to speak to and demand accountability on this issue.

      This part confuses me a bit. Are they saying the white women are being racist towards them? Why are they focusing on only white women here and not the mean as well?

    2. e—because, being on the bottom, we would have to do what no one else has done: we would have to fight the world. [2]

      It's sad that they have to work harder than almost any other group to achieve the same goal as say a white male was trying to achieve. I can only begin to imagine how difficult it felt for these black women to try and reach a goal when so many people and other factors were against them.

    3. Black feminist politics also have an obvious connection to movements for Black liberation, particularly those of the 1960s and I970s. Many of us were active in those movements (Civil Rights, Black nationalism, the Black Panthers), and all of our lives Were greatly affected and changed by their ideologies, their goals, and the tactics used to achieve their goals.

      I wonder if there were any parts of these movements that the black feminists did not agree with at all or had a different viewpoint on.

    1. o, this helps all the churches, and since it helps all the churches, they don’t fight him. Well, we going to do the same thing, only our gospel is black nationalism. His gospel is white nationalism, our gospel is black nationalism. And the gospel of black nationalism, as I told you, means you should control your own

      I went to a predominantly African American Baptist church when I was on a mission trip in New Orleans and it was truly a life-changing experience. The passion within the church was unmatched and everyone there wanted to be there. The words the people were preaching were not written out or planned, they were emotional and focused on what came to the pastors mind in the moment. I found this very different from my experience at predominantly white churches where it was much more subdued and planned out.

    2. ts. A Dixiecrat is nothing but a Democrat. Whoever runs the Democrats is also the father of the Dixiecrats. And the father of all of them is sitting in the White House. [applause] I say, and I’ll say it again, you got a president who’s nothing but a southern segregationist [applause] from the state of Texas. They’ll lynch in Texas as quick as they’ll lynch you in Mississippi. Only in Texas they lynch you with a Texas accent, in Mississippi they lynch you with a Mississippi accent. [cheering]

      They keep these people in the government for so long because African Americans have been repressed from voting which is who would have voted these segregationists out of office.

    3. e you’re a second-class citizen? They don’t have second-class citizenship in any other government on this Earth. They just have slaves and people who are free! Well, this country is a hypocrite! They try and make you think they set you free by calling you a second-class citizen. No, you’re nothing but a 20th century slave. [applause]

      This is going to sound veryyyy weird but Malcolm X reminds me of Donald Trump a little bit. They are both very radical and stand behind what they say 100%. They have a viewpoint and they do not change it for the world. They both have opinions on things that lean very far one way.

    4. The economic philosophy of black nationalism only means that we should own and operate and control the economy of our community. You would never have found—you can’t open up a black store in a white community. White man won’t even patronize you. And he’s not wrong. He got sense enough to look out for himself. It’s you who don’t have sense enough to look out for yourself. [applause]

      If I am understanding this correctly, I feel like this could create further segregation between black and whites because they are creating their own economy which is separate from the white peoples economy. He says they couldn't open up a black store in a white community, but this is the only way to truly integrate both races.

    1. All this is a long, slow talk. Nothing is more striking than the simple innocence of the men who insist, whenever an objective is present, on the prompt production of a patent scheme guaranteed to produce a result. Human endeavor is not so simple as that. Government includes the art of formulating a policy, and using the political technique to attain so much of that policy as will receive general support; persuading, leading, sacrificing, teaching always, because the greatest duty of a statesman is to educate.

      Here, he is admitting that this government he longs for will take a while to come into focus. He understands that anything in government takes a long time to actually be enacted because there are so many steps it has to go through. He also highlights the point that citizens must be educated about this change.

    2. Our task now is not discovery or exploitation of natural resources, or necessarily producing more goods. It is the soberer, less dramatic business of administering resources and plants already in hand, of seeking to reestablish foreign markets for our surplus production, of meeting the problem of under consumption, of adjusting production to consumption, of distributing wealth and products more equitably, of adapting existing economic organizations to the service of the people. The day of enlightened administration has come.

      Here, he is basically saying that our constantly growing and changing economy will now begin to slow down and we as the people must not try to flood it with new products and business ideas, but to take what we currently have and work with it: redistribute resources more equally, export only what we have surplus of, and change our economy so it directly serves the people.

    3. But Mr. Jefferson, in the summer of 1776, after drafting the Declaration of Independence turned his mind to the same problem and took a different view. He did not deceive himself with outward forms. Government to him was a means to an end, not an end in itself; it might be either a

      Interesting how in the introduction he continually draws back to other well-known people such as past presidents or other members of government. He referred to these people and their ideas to support his own ideas. By drawing in already well received political figures, it helped back his thoughts and may make people more receptible to his drastic ideas.

    1. You come to us and tell us that the great cities are in favor of the gold standard; we reply that the great cities rest upon our broad and fertile prairies

      After learning the results of this election, it may have been true that the great cities favored the gold standard because he ended up losing the election which means many large states or cities probably did not vote for him.

    2. They say that we are opposing national bank currency. It is true.

      This statement shows him and the rest of the democratic party longs for change which will make a positive impact on the country. I think this is still true today because the democratic party seems to favor change while the republican party likes things to stay the same if they are working well.

    3. The gentleman from Wisconsin has said that he fears a Robespierre. My friends, in this land of the free you need not fear that a tyrant will spring up from among the people.

      represent

    4. is paramount issue; and concluding with the request that the believers in the free coinage of silver in the Democratic party should organize, take charge of and control the policy of the Democratic party.

      It's very interesting to me that money and monetary policy was the main contender in this presidential election. I feel as if this has changed because today a presidential election would never debate about whether or not silver should debase the currency.

    1. In prosecuting the anti-slavery enterprise, we have been asked to spare the church, to spare the ministry; but how, we ask, could such a thing be done? We are met on the threshold of our efforts for the redemption of the slave, by the church and ministry of the country, in battle arrayed against us; and we are compelled to fight or flee. From what quarter, I beg to know, has proceeded a fire so deadly upon our ranks,

      I think the majority of churches not standing up to slavery is similar today of churches stance to LGBTQ communities. The church is split between wanting to please its long standing members and not change its stance on anything dramatically and wanting to facilitate positive change in the world and demonstrate acceptance.

    2. I was born amid such sights and scenes. To me the American slave-trade is a terrible reality. When a child, my soul was often pierced with a sense of its horrors. I lived on Philpot Street, Fell’s Point, Baltimore, and have watched from the wharves, the slave ships in the Basin, anchored from the shore, with their cargoes of human flesh, waiting for favorable winds to waft them down the Chesapeake. There was, at that time, a grand slave mart kept at the head of Pratt Street, by Austin Woldfolk. His agents were sent into every town and county in Maryland, announcing their arrival, through the papers, and on flaming “hand-bills,” headed CASH FOR NEGROES.

      I cannot believe that he had to go through this as a child. I feel like this could have very damaging effects on children and I am surprised that as an adult he is able to stand up and truly believe in his words when he preaches that this treatment is unacceptable. I think it is surprising he can speak out about it now because he was taught at such a young age about slavery and about how it was normal.

    3. They were peace men; but they preferred revolution to peaceful submission to bondage. They were quiet men; but they did not shrink from agitating against oppression. They showed forbearance; but that they knew its limits. They believed in order; but not in the order of tyranny. With them, nothing was “settled” that was not right. With them, justice, liberty and humanity were “final;” not slavery and oppression. You may well cherish the memory of such men. They were great in their day and generation. Their solid manhood stands out the more as we contrast it with these degenerate times.

      I like this passage because it states how the African American men were not bad men in their actions, they just did not stand for the terrible conditions they were forced into. They dealt with the things they were put through in a fair manner and clearly demonstrated that they would not stand for their current treatment.

    1. Negro women, symbolized in a seventy two year old woman in Montgomery, Alabama, who rose up with a sense of dignity and with her people decided not to ride segregated buses, and who responded with ungrammatical profundity to one who inquired about her weariness: “My feets is tired, but my soul is at rest.”

      I think this whole paragraph is establishing what the worth of this whole process of demonstrations and protests are. He is explaining that while it might be such difficult and heart wrenching work now, it will all be worth it in the end. They will feel so much better in the future with their new-founded rights even if they are extremely exhausted. It is better to be tired than regretful.

    2. he Negro has many pent up resentments and latent frustrations, and he must release them. So let him march; let him make prayer pilgrimages to the city hall; let him go on freedom rides -and try to understand why he must do so.

      He says this, but I think this is something very difficult for someone other than African Americans to understand. For white people, they cannot imagine the type of oppression the black people had felt for so long. Therefore, it might be difficult for white people to accept the protests and demonstrations because they cannot feel the anger and frustrations of the black people. They could attempt to sympathize with them, but it is not the same.

    3. we decided to undertake a process of self purification. We began a series of workshops on nonviolence, and we repeatedly asked ourselves: “Are you able to accept blows without retaliating?” “Are you able to endure the ordeal of jail?”

      It's sad that they had to instill this type of training because they knew that their non-violent protests were going to attract brutality from bystanders that do not agree with them and the police force. They were so determined to stay non-violent that they actually made workshops for their protestors. MLK predicted correctly about the jail time and violence. He ended up in jail and was later killed.

    1. Anarchism urges man to think, to investigate, to analyze every proposition; but that the brain capacity of the average reader be not taxed too much, I also shall begin with a definition, and then elaborate on the latter.

      maybe amberlee's quote

  2. Oct 2019
    1. The more hideous the mental contortions, the greater the delight and bravos of the mass. Thus, poor in ideals and vulgar of soul, Roosevelt continues to be the man of the hour.

      I am very surprised she would publicly attack President Roosevelt like this because he was a very popular president that many stood behind. Cannot believe she is saying that he is playing mind games to win over the people.

    2. Anarchism is the great liberator of man from the phantoms that have held him captive; it is the arbiter and pacifier of the two forces for individual and social harmony. To accomplish that unity, Anarchism has declared war on the pernicious influences which have so far prevented the harmonious blending of individual and social instincts, the individual and society.

      Some believe that government helps in protecting our liberties because the government has power to punish those who infringe on citizen's powers; although, the author of this essay is confident that the government does exactly the opposite and by eliminating them it will give us unlimited freedoms without any consequences.

    3. , Anarchism must needs meet with the combined ignorance and venom of the world it aims to reconstruct.

      I think this is such a poetic and interesting way to say that to transform society into one without a government, just voluntary and cooperative organization, it must first deal with the "ignorance" and "venom" of the world speaking of the current evils imbedded into it.

    1. Seen from a lower point of view, the Constitution, with all its faults, is very good; the law and the courts are very respectable; even this State and this American government are, in many respects, very admirable, and rare things, to be thankful for, such as a great many have described them; but seen from a point of view a little higher, they are what I have described them; seen from a higher still, and the highest, who shall say what they are, or that they are worth looking at or thinking of at all?

      It seems to me that he is portraying himself as higher and better than the ordinary person here. He is saying that if you look at the constitiution and our government through the eyes of a regular person you may think it's great and works good, but I can see all its faults and you should just trust me that it's bad and will not work.

    2. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose.

      He continues to go back to one of his main points here about how the majority will always be the most powerful no matter what even if their decision doesn't make any sense. He wishes that our decisions could be made from "consciousness," not just the majority's rule; although, this is difficult because whose consciousness is going to be most morally correct and how do we decide this?

    3. The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailers, constables, posse comitatus, etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well.

      Here, he is showing his discontent with the actual people who work in and for the government. He relates them to machines because they have no human like qualities and just do what they are programmed to do. I think he exaggerates a little much at this point and is being too dramatic and over critical of government workers- they are not the same and many probably believe in what they are doing.

    1. tes, going thither on business, were, in many instances subjected to the same fate. Thus went on this process of hanging, from gamblers to negroes, from negroes to white citizens, and from these to strangers; till, dead men were seen literally dangling from the boughs of trees upon every road side; and in numbers almost sufficient, to rival the native Spanish moss of the country, as a drapery of the forest.

      number 3

    2. I mean the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country; the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions, in lieu of the sober judgment of Courts;

      number 2

    3. But I do mean to say, that, although bad laws, if they exist, should be repealed as soon as possible, still while they continue in force, for the sake of example, they should be religiously observed

      He is really going for this adherence to the laws thing. He is literally saying that even if it makes no sense we should still follow it because it's a law. I get where is he coming from because everyone has different opinions of laws and if he said if you don't like it don't follow it there would always be someone not following it because there is never anonymity in a law.

    4. I know the American People are much attached to their Government;–I know they would suffer much for its sake;–I know they would endure evils long and patiently, before they would ever think of exchanging it for another

      Surprised to hear Lincoln say this because today I feel as if this is not true. Many people dislike the government and the people in the government and would not suffer for its sake. Just another example of how the United States has changed.

    5. anything of its length, that has ever been witnessed in real life. A mulatto man, by the name of McIntosh, was seized in the street, dragged to the suburbs of the city, chained to a tree, and actually burned to death; and all within a single hour from the time he had been a freeman, attending to his own business, and at peace with the world.

      Could be seen as foreshadowing to the large role Lincoln played in ending slavery in the United States and getting African Americans the same rights as whites. He saw this as horrifying and terrible while many probably were used to this treatment of minorities.

    6. I mean the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country; the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions, in lieu of the sober judgment of Courts; and the worse than savage mobs, for the executive ministers of justice.

      I think he is saying here how we would rather follow our hearts and our instincts than the law he has laid out for us and this worries him because it is not responsible or smart.

    1. and consequently the stability and independence of some member of the government, the only other security, must be proportionately increased.

      It's important they talk about stability as well here. I feel like stability is something expected of government, but there are not always factors that enforce something like this.

    2. It is equally evident, that the members of each department should be as little dependent as possible on those of the others,

      Interesting that this is kind of saying no collaboration- each member for him/her self

    3. Either the existence of the same passion or interest in a majority at the same time must be prevented,

      confused why this would have to be prevented? seems like a good thing

    4. Nor, in many cases, can such an adjustment be made at all without taking into view indirect and remote considerations, which will rarely prevail over the immediate interest which one party may find in disregarding the rights of another or the good of the whole.

      I think this is saying how it's easier to do something for the common good rather than one specific group because that will make that one specific group extremely happy, but it will not make other groups happy at all.

    5. There are two methods of curing the mischiefs of faction: the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling its effects.

      I like how this is said. But I personally think removing its causes is the best way because it removes the issue at the core rather than letting it occur and having to deal with the consequences.

    1. No priviledge, reserved by the bills of rights, or secured by the state government, can limit the power granted by this, or restrain any laws made in pursuance of it.

      This is crazy that they are saying nothing is above the constitution, not even human rights.

    2. it was necessary that a certain portion of natural liberty should be surrendered, in order, that what remained should be preserved: how great a proportion of natural freedom is necessary to be yielded by individuals

      I think this is a problem we still struggle with today. The balance between natural liberties and and government protections.

    3. In a pure democracy the people are the sovereign, and their will is declared by themselves; for this purpose they must all come together to deliberate, and decide. This kind of government cannot be exercised, therefore, over a country of any considerable extent; it must be confined to a single city, or at least limited to such bounds as that the people can conveniently assemble

      I think it's interesting to read this quote now and look at how we have tried to implement this idea. I think we have tried to use this idea for very large areas such as the whole USA during a presidential election. We use voting as a way for every citizen to get their voice heard; although, this doesn't always occur because of the electoral college. Sometimes a president will win the popular vote but not the electoral vote which doesn't represent a democracy.

    4. ot only [is] the power to lay taxes unlimited, as to the amount they may require, but it is perfect and absolute to raise them in any mode they please. No state legislature, or any power in the state governments,

      I feel like this is not the case today- if this was said today I think it would cause a lot of disputes and people would not take well to it.

    5. but few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged their authority. This is a sufficient reason to induce you to be careful, in the first instance, how you deposit the powers of government.

      I love how this is said. It actually makes sense how some governmental agencies have acquired so much power. If we vote them to have more power they are not going to say "I don't want this power." All the power government is given that we complain about is power we have given them.

    1. You must have known Chaerephon; he was early a friend of mine, and also a friend of yours, for he shared in the recent exile of the people, and returned with you. Well, Chaerephon, as you know, was very impetuous in all his doings, and he went to Delphi and boldly asked the oracle to tell him whether—as

      strong passage

    2. And first, I have to reply to the older charges and to my first accusers, and then I will go on to the later ones. For of old I have had many accusers, who have accused me falsely to you during many years; and I am more afraid of them than of Anytus and his associates, who are dangerous, too, in their own way. But far more dangerous are the others, who began when you were

      guilty passage

    3. But you, Meletus, have sufficiently shown that you never had a thought about the young: your carelessness is seen in your not caring about the very things which you bring against me

      His defense strategy here is to attack the other sides credibility. he goes after Meletus's carelessness in this statement.

    4. but from me you shall hear the whole truth: not, however, delivered after their manner in a set oration duly ornamented with words and phrases. No, by heaven! but I shall use the words and arguments which occur to me at the moment; for I am confident in the justice of my cause

      This is very confident of him which I believe can go a long way when attempting to convince a jury of your innocence.

    1. He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known.

      Shows that society has not only treated man and woman unequally, but actually made woman's lives worse than men's lives.

    2. Whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

      So similar to the Declaration of Independence just this time having to do with women's rights.

    3. Resolved, That inasmuch as man, while claiming for himself intellectual superiority, does accord to woman moral superiority, it is pre-eminently his duty to encourage her to speak, and teach, as she has an opportunity, in all religious assemblies.

      Is this saying that if a man puts himself above a woman then the woman is technically above him morally?

  3. Sep 2019
    1. ependent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

      Dumb question probably, but were we the first state to claim our independence from another country and if not who was the first country to do so?

    2. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

      This reiterates their want to govern themselves and not be governed by a country that is so far away. Especially because they don't have a say in anything

    3. He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

      A rule we have in place today to prevent this is the life-long job of being a supreme court judge to ensure their decisions are not swayed based on who they are employed by.

    4. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

      This is important because it shows they want to be able to pass their own laws which they currently cannot do because the King neglects them.

    5. dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth,

      This is a powerful start to the document. It shows how straight-forward and strong the rest of it will be.

    1. Each Congress to sit and to choose a president by the following method. When the delegates are met, let a colony be taken from the whole thirteen colonies by lot, after which, let the whole Congress choose (by ballot) a president from out of the delegates of that province. In the next Congress, let a colony be taken by lot from twelve only, omitting that colony from which the president was taken in the former Congress, and so proceeding on till the whole thirteen shall have had their proper rotation. And in order that nothing may pass into a law but what is satisfactorily just, not less than three fifths of the Congress to be called a majority. — He that will promote discord, under a government so equally formed as this, would have joined Lucifer in his revolt.

      This is very similar to our house and senate today.

    2. All anti-monarchical parts of scripture have been very smoothly glossed over in monarchical governments

      I think this relates to the church right now in terms of sexual orientations. Some forms of Christianity point out parts of the bible that shame sexual orientations other than straight but ignore the parts that might point towards the bible being ok with gay, lesbian or other people.

    3. ELECTED might never form to themselves an interest separate from the ELECTORS, prudence will point out the propriety of having elections often: because as the ELECTED might

      This is the beginning of democracy with the elected individuals

    4. first laws will have the title only of Regulations and be enforced by no other penalty than public disesteem. In this first parliament every man by natural right will have a seat.

      I think that this is correct because it is a very simplistic way of doing things that is not always fair which makes sense because they are a beginning nation.

    5. society will be their first thought.

      Interesting that he says society is first thought- it is reiterating his point that society is more "positive" than government. We as the people long for society, but we need government to run this society.

    6. society will be their first thought.

      Interesting that he says society is first thought- it is reiterating his point that society is more "positive" than government. We as the people long for society, but we need government to run this society.

    1. Wherefore we will and firmly order that the English Church be free, and that the men in our kingdom have and hold all the aforesaid liberties, rights, and concessions, well and peaceably, freely and quietly, fully and wholly, for themselves and their heirs, of us and our heirs, in all respects and in all places forever, as is aforesaid. An oath, moreover, has been taken, as well on our part as on the art of the barons, that all these conditions aforesaid shall be kept in good faith and without evil intent.

      Interesting that the church wrote out laws like this. Usually there are suggestions or ethical standards you are supposed to follow, but not an actual set of rules. This shows how central the church used to be to society. It is still very important now, but there are many other things more powerful.

    2. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond.

      I wonder if the no interest rule is because of the Jewish people's religion. It seems as if they have made this specific rule for the Jewish people, and it does not apply to everyone.

    3. The guardian, moreover, so long as he has the wardship of the land, shall keep up the houses, parks, fishponds, stanks, mills, and other things pertaining to the land, out of the issues of the same land;

      What would be the punishment if the land-owner did not keep up the land?

    1. “My task is now finished. I have performed it to the best of my ability, and in word, at least, the requirements of the law are now satisfied. If deeds be in question, those who are here interred have received part of their honours already, and for the rest, their children will be brought up till manhood at the public expense: the state thus offers a valuable prize, as the garland of victory in this race of valour, for the reward both of those who have fallen and their survivors. And where the rewards for merit are greatest, there are found the best citizens.

      I am not sure if I am understanding this completely correct but it seems as if he is saying that dying is a garland of victory. Like it's the greatest thing one can achieve. I believe he is saying that it is the greatest thing because they died in war for their country, but I still believe you can help your country out without having to die.

    2. hree days before the ceremony, the bones of the dead are laid out in a tent which has been erected; and their friends bring to their relatives such offerings as they please.

      This reminds me of what happened with Jesus when he died

    1. But in an oligarchy, the desire of many to do the state good service sometimes engenders bitter enmity among them; for each one wishing to be chief of all and to make his counsels prevail, violent enmity is the outcome, enmity brings faction and faction bloodshed; and the end of bloodshed is monarchy; whereby it is shown that this fashion of government is the best. Again, the rule of the commonalty must of necessity engender evil-mindedness; and when evil-mindedness in public matters is engendered, bad men are not divided by enmity but united by close friendship; for they that would do evil to the commonwealth conspire together to do it.

      I think it's very interesting that this man believes the opinions and actions of one person can successfully govern an entire country. I would like to see what this person would say about monarchy if someone he didn't like was in control of the entire government. This point is easily made when you respect the one person in charge, but would be miserable if you did not agree with the policies of the monarch. Additionally, it does not take into account the opinions of anyone living in the country who are the people that actually have to live under this rule. In my opinion, this form of government is dangerous and should not be tolerated.