Yet we see this all the times, police officers taking course of their own actions and doing what they want. We saw this in the Geroge Floyd incident which officers took serious aggression without any harmful intent from Mr. Floyd. I think after that incident however, officers were more tamed given they recognized the amount of blacklashing the officers in the incident got.

Proactive policing can disrupt communal life by increasing surveillance and law enforcement presence, which may weaken trust and cooperation within communities. The social bonds can undermine informal social controls that lead to worse results.

I believe that artificial intelligence should definitely be used to help guide decisions and provide certain information. There are still may flaws within artificial intelligence and we know based on other experiences with artificial intelligence that they can create mindsets of their own which can then lead to not reducing bias but increasing it, providing incorrect information towards jurors and twisting their minds.

With different jurors having many opinions and biases that create certain decisions, it makes sense how artificial intelligence cannot make absolute decisions. Now what if majority of jurors were able to join together to create a single mindset. Would that create a system where bias is almost diminished?

How do we create artificial intelligence to bypass the bias system when we create it. Artificial intelligence needs a certain mindset to think off of and us humans creating it provides input into the artificial intelligence system.