10 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2023
    1. While the women in this study recognise the importance of sexuality labels, we argue that neoliberal discourses encourage an individualist rejection of labels. However, as we observe throughout this article, sexuality labels are also simultaneously meaningful for women as they demonstrate an extended, reflexive engagement with labels. What is their motivation for asserting that public identity categories do not matter? We suggest that in a homonormative, rural context, there is more to be gained from claiming ordinariness than emphasising minority status. Under neoliberalism, ‘identity politics’ is increasingly used as a derogatory synonym for feminism and anti-heterosexism – akin to complaints of ‘political correctness gone mad’ (Bernstein, 2005: 48). Homonormativity represents individuals as free, neutral citizens, whereas identity politics is reserved for ‘others’, thereby making the notion of the ‘ordinary’ citizen gendered, raced and classed. For example, as Hekman (2004: 6) argues, white, heterosexual men are never acknowledged as having an identity.

      This interesting article explores how women in rural Australia identify or disidentify with sexuality labels. I have never really considered they way in which people in the LGBTQ community form their identities especially in regards to neoliberalism.

    1. The image’s small size makes it easy to share across Twitter, Facebook, reddit, or any other social media platform. Rather than weakening its claims, the meme’s simplicity is its strength; in the time it might take a person to write a cogent rebuttal to the image’s claims, users can share the image across dozens of pages and platforms, where it can be deployed as a counter to pro-immigration discussions or claims with little effort.

      This is such an interesting note on the power of a meme and it's potential to spread a message. The article goes on to suggest that some platforms "manipulate social media trends". It makes one reflect on the message behind the memes that they may have sent recently, was it more than humour? The article also compares memes to propaganda and it reminds me of the propaganda used by the Nazi party during WWII and the way in which it portrayed such negative images of Jewish people in a way that was quickly understood and spread.

  2. Mar 2023
    1. Following this successful politicization, there were other similar victories that the Critical Bike Ride group could at least in part claim ownership for. In 2012, the first cycling fast lane was opened in the Helsinki city centre. In the transportation plans accepted in the following years, cycling got gradually more attention and a bigger budget. The cycling fast lane plan developed to cover the whole city by 2020. In 2016, the City Council accepted a plan to transform one of the main axes of the eastern city centre into a public transport and cycling only street (Hämeentie 2016).

      Perhaps one reason as to why the Critical Bike Ride group failed to maintain its traction within the community may be that most of the individuals felt that they had achieved what they set out to do? I think if you were to join in on a political movement and you saw positive change then you wouldn't feel the need to stay involved.

    1. The reason direct, consensus-based democracy has been so firmly embraced by and identified with anarchism is because it embodies what is perhaps anarchism's most fundamental principle: that in the same way human beings treated like children will tend to act like children, the way to encourage human beings to act like mature and responsible adults is to treat them as if they already are.

      I find this article really tricky to comment on. On the one hand I think a democracy based on consensus decision makes a very compelling idea where everyone wins in one way or another. But I don't fully understand how this would work of a national scale. Thinking of it as anarchism is confusing to me because would there not be some remaining power imbalances between those making decisions? How should we expect to maintain peace?

    1. During lunch and dinner times, most of the “yellow restaurants” are crowded with consumers, while “blue restaurants” have seen a significant fall in their number of customers.Footnote3333 Cherney and Yeo Citation2019Cherney, Mike, and Rachel Yeo. 2019. “In Divided Hong Kong, Apps Help to Avoid Eating With the Enemy.” The Wall Street Journal, November 7. Accessed December 16, 2019: https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-divided-hong-kong-apps-help-to-avoid-eating-with-the-enemy-11573122605. [Google Scholar]. The pro-government camp also mobilizes their people to support the blue businesses.View all notes

      The "yellow economic circle" is such an interesting form of protest and a good reminder of the power behind one's dollar! While I had never heard of the "yellow economic circle" before I guess it can be thought of a similar act to boycotting companies and business that promote unethical working conditions or unsustainable practices. I am interested to learn more about the impact of this economic protest.

    1. The charade continued even after this with Joe Biden proclaiming that “the scenes of chaos at the Capitol do not reflect the true America, do not represent who we are”.

      The storming of the US Capitol reminded me of the Cronulla riots and this response by Joe Biden seems similar to the response PM John Howard gave when he said he believed Australian's weren't racist and denied any underlying racism issues in Australia. However, clearly there is evidence to disagree with both Biden and Howard. I think these events are good examples of how protest fuelled by hatred and anger become riots.

    1. Civil society often acts towards aims that are defined broadly in order to make them better acceptable to large sectors of public opinion. In this way, civil society is seen as the texture of cooperative and associational ties, fostering mutual trust and shared values, ultimately strengthening social cohesion (Putnam 1993).

      These two sentences really stuck out to me because it made me think that civil society and social movements actually have common goals. As the author goes on to say, social movements are supposed to be disturbing however do they not aim to strengthen social cohesion in a way that is similar to a civil society? It also got me thinking that maybe we could consider a society that is formed through social movements and activism (e.g. a group of protesters) as civil?

    1. Thus, shifting the focus away from relatively powerless and marginalized activists, the ‘capitalism and social movements’ school proposes seeing neoliberalism as a coalition of groups aimed at reorganizing the hegemony of capitalist institutions; an enterprise that involved significant networking and mobilization by business and related organizations, such as pro-market foundations, research centers, and think tanks.

      Thinking of neoliberalism as social movement is really interesting. My initial thoughts are that if neoliberalism includes reducing state influence in the economy through market-oriented reform policies, then it is bringing about social change. However I have always understood social movements as a response to inequality and neoliberalism would reduce the social and welfare responsibilities of the government thus creating more inequality.

    1. The spread of the new coronavirus and its mitigation overshadowed any other political or social issue. It became the only focus of political debates, mainstream and alternative media and most conversations in daily life.

      This point reminds me of what we learnt about social movements in the lecture. The pandemic effected people from different degrees globally including those who have power and are privileged enough to not need to fix the inequalities that impact other daily.

      Social movements come about when their is perceived inequalities which means they would be primarily made up of minorities or people who want to stop problems created by the government and corporations etc., therefore it can be expected that these social movements wouldn't receive the same coverage as the pandemic because the issues only effect one percentage of the population.

    1. In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. We have gone through all these steps in Birmingham.

      While reading this part of Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter I find it interesting to consider the social construction of crime and how time and place decided whether or not someone is a criminal. This part of the letter shows how determined they were to negotiate and stick to a nonviolent campaign however they were still considered criminals. In comparison the government was not considered criminal for segregation and racism. Now we consider the actions of King Jr. as admirable.