Perhaps Twitter can be replaced with "X" in the text to reflect the platform’s current branding?

Broken Link

Should we consider any ethical concerns in trying to recreate or simulate traumatic or sacred experiences for the sake of immersion, specially in archeological studies?

The link takes you section 2.1 instead of the reference

Isn't it challenging for researchers/ archeology students to navigate situations where the preferred forms of communication for one group (e.g., open data, interactive maps, blogs) are at odds with the norms of another group (e.g., traditional publications, restricted access, or cultural protocols)?

Missing reference in the list

I wonder how can this be practically implemented in archaeology courses that must still meet traditional accreditation or departmental assessment standards? How can this approach work for classes with large groups of students?

Missing Reference

Broken Link

The link here takes you back to Section 1.1 instead of the Trello Product Page.

I also think Asana would be a good example here.

Here the text mentions that digital humanities is a successor to 'humanities computing' but does not clearly define either. I think it would be helpful to distinguish the methodological or philosophical differences between the two.

I know Watrall has been cited multiple times in the text, but I think it would be useful to cite here as well in order for easier accessibility to the reference where he "identifies the emergence of the web as being not so much a boon for computational archaeology"

Perhaps some of Ben Marwick's works could be cited here so people can see his research and methodologies. I don't see a mention of his work even in the References list.