This last two lines are perfectly summarize the serene and calm moment that the calf is enjoying, and what for humans is a source of disgust, for him becomes a source of beauty. More on that on my "Final reflections" page.

The author was not concerned with complex stylistic and poetic language and figures. However, this enjambment lets the reader focus on the phrase freak of nature, which is how the two-headed calf is first described. It shows, as the whole first stanza does, the cold and cruel behavior of the farmers towards him.

This second stanza, instead, completely opposes the first one, and focuses on the present moment and life.

By using the term body, the author implies that the calf is already dead; having a deformity means that his life-span will be shorter.

Notice how the author uses he instead of it to refer to the calf. Maybe this stylistic choice is used to let the reader identify themselves with the calf; it could also be used to give more humanity to the animal, instead of referring to him with the pronoun used for objects.

This first stanza focuses on future and death.

This last two lines are perfectly summarize the serene and calm moment that the calf is enjoying, and what for humans is a source of disgust, for him becomes a source of beauty. More on that on my "Final reflections" page.

This second stanza, instead, completely opposes the first one, and focuses on the present moment and life.

The author was not concerned with complex stylistic and poetic language and figures. However, this enjambment lets the reader focus on the phrase freak of nature, which is how the two-headed calf is first described. It shows, as the whole first stanza does, the cold and cruel behavior of the farmers towards him

By using the term body, the author implies that the calf is already dead; having a deformity means that his life-span will be shorter.

Notice how the author uses he instead of it to refer to the calf. Maybe this stylistic choice is used to let the reader identify themselves with the calf; it could also be used to give more humanity to the animal, instead of referring to him with the pronoun used for objects.

This first stanza focuses on future and death.