14 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2016
    1. nordertodepictautomatedTwitterentities(whetherasbotsorcyborgs),Chuetal(2010)proposedafourwaytesttodistinguishfakesfromhumans.Measuringtheintervalsbetweenretweetsprovedaveryreliablemethodofsensingautomatedmessaging.Lookingforspamwasalsoreliablebecausehumansveryrarelymessagespam,andexaminingtheaccountpropertiesofeachsubscriberalsoprovedreliable,sincethosesubscriberswithnorealaccountdetails,pictures,ordescriptors,wereveryrarelyindicativeofindividualhumans.Additionally,botsarefarmorelikelytopostURLsthanhumans.Bylookingatallofthesevariablesinconcert,thecredibilityofretweetingfollowerscanbeestablished(Chu,etal.,2010)

      This is will help strengthen my argument, and clarify it since I will be able to cite these ways to depict automated twitter accounts

    2. Twitterhasthepotentialforincreasingpoliticalparticipation(Hamdy,2010;Wilson,2011;Parmelee&Bichard,2013).Thereisacloseassociationwithaugmentedretweetsinpoliticalelectionsthatsuggeststhepresenceofwide‐spreadsockpuppetry(StieglitzandDang‐Xuan,2012).SockpuppetryinTwitterretweetsisassistedbytheuseofmetadata,inparticularURLsand#hashtags(Suh,Lichan,Pirolli,&Chi,2010;Yang&Counts,2010).Retweetedintegrationincludestheuseofpolicy‐event‘#hashtags’,togaugethepopularityorsignificanceofevents,policies,orpeople.ThusinpoliticalTwittercommunities,whereaspecificeventsuchasanelectionisinplay,theretweetcomponentsallowfortheamplificationofpoliticalnarrativesthroughsockpuppetry.

      Makes an argument that twitter can be used in politics, through sock puppetry and I wholly agree, this will fit with my paper since this was one of my main claims.

    1. M a r k e t e r s still love to sell us nostalgic forms of authentic goods. Th e United States off ers Disneyworld’s pristine Main Street U.S.A.; Cracker Barrel’s general store, replete with its old-fashioned candy jars and moon pies amid a faux-rusticated interior; Pottery Barn’s new distressed furniture, machine made to look old and weath-ered. Likewise, Britain is awash in the selling of a venerable old England, from the vine-covered cottage, to the proliferation of the heritage industry, to the open-ing of Dickens World in Kent, to the immensely popular Hovis Bread ads, which featured a young boy delivering loaves of fresh bread down a cobblestone street. In a diff erent variation of the phenomenon, marketers present a refi ned aesthetic, one miraculously and allegedly free of the vulgar taint of commerce; here we fi nd the soft -focus Ralph Lauren ad; the fi reside scene of the L. L. Bean Christmas catalog, with its golden retriever puppies reclining on softfl annel; and the solid sophistication (with lovely wood accents) of the venerable London store Liberty. In every case, the viewer is assured that the real is “real”—and readily available for a reasonable price.

      I think this is interesting because the market is using consumers want for something authentic, nostaligic and real to mass produce products that will sell for this very reason, which makes it kind of inauthentic. The thing that comes to my mind is "distressed" jeans, which're made to look old and tattered which is the rave nowadays

    2. Over the course of the next century, dramatic changes in advertis-ing, marketing, and shopping would encourage consumers not simply to live a life but to select among lifestyles; not to stay within the given circumstances and time of their birth but to live within multiple pasts; not to remain fi xed in one identity but to perform within many.

      advertising and marketing provided a way for people to live their life however they pleased and find their own identity but they'd have to select one which was the social norm and prevalent in society.

  2. Oct 2016
    1. The polemic of authenticity is nicely illus-trated by the frequent mediaeval era disputes, seizures, and thefts, of relics, bonesor objects reputed to be associated with holy men of the Christian church

      This could be used in my argument, regular people "stealing" something associated with a famous person. Such as trends "stolen" (this word is a little harsh) from well known people by their followers, thereby making them less authentic.

    2. ‘authenticity is implicitly a polemi-cal concept’.

      I agree with this point, authenticity is very important into determining the worth of a piece of work, at least that's how I interpret this statement.

  3. Sep 2016
    1. My decision to expose myself to the sexism of Dr. Dre, Ice Cube, Snoop Doggy Dog, or the Notorious B.I.G. is really my plea to my broth- ers to tell me who they are. I need to know why they are so angry at me. Why is disrespecting me one of the few things that will make them feel like men? What are they going through on the daily that's got them acting so fucked up?

      This perspective is interesting because it's so different than mainstream thoughts and what appears in many people's bias that just stops after calling rappers "violent gangsters" and etc. It really makes you question what is going through these great rappers minds, and put yourself in their shoes, even if it's just for a second.

    1. effectively denied rap the status of ar

      Many people could have their own definition on what is and isn't art, but it shouldn't be able to be used in trials just because of someones opinion over if it's art or not.

    1. Over time — by which I mean a day or two — you start to like the song a little. It makes people happy, right?

      Social Influence starts to rub off on people that were hesitant to like a song, and slowly they grow a fondness of it bc it "makes people happy" which could technically also mean it makes them happy too.

    1. This comment is a zeminder that Dylan's own musical education did not comesolely, or even primarily, from witnessing live performances.

      Authenticity doesn't come from watching someone else perform and trying to replicate what they did/their style.

    1. They both speak by and to the same organs; the bodies in which both of them are clothed may be said to be of the same substance, their affections are kindred, and almost identical, not necessarily differing even in degree; Poetry*sheds no tears ’such as Angels weep,’ but natural and human tears; she can boast of no celestial choir that distinguishes her vital juices from those of prose; the same human blood circulates through the veins of them both.

      these couple of sentences has may examples of "they say", to compare both poetry and paintings, also personifying them by giving them "bodies" and etc.

    2. We are fond of tracing the resemblance between Poetry and Painting, and, accordingly, we call them Sisters: but where shall we find bonds of connexion sufficiently strict to typify the affinity betwixt metrical and prose composition?

      He continuously says we, and coincidentally never says I in this paragraph to create a collective group of people with the same ideas as him.

    3. We will go further.

      He says we to include the readers and himself in a group.

  4. Aug 2016
    1. keenly interested to find out that others see the real differently from us.

      this is somewhat false, because there are individuals who feel as if their points of view are superior than others, and they downright shun other's beliefs if they're different.