It requires a target who isn’t thinking carefully about what you are saying
this might be effective as something that you see in passing like a billboard on the freeway or an add on snapchat or instagram
It requires a target who isn’t thinking carefully about what you are saying
this might be effective as something that you see in passing like a billboard on the freeway or an add on snapchat or instagram
When persuasion is well-meaning, we might call it education. When it is manipulative, it might be called mind control
I feel like it should only be considered education when what the person is being persuaded of is true or a fact
The results showed that mothers reported experiencing more positive emotional states when away from home (including at work), whereas fathers showed the reverse pattern.
This is sort of the opposite of what our culture tells us. Women are portrayed as having strong maternal instincts and wanting more than anything to be with their children.
And what about those who didn’t find a dime? Only 1 out 25 of them bothered to help.
This is so interesting!
to choose to receive a greater shock in the presence of the two confederates
It seems like this is them trying to prove themselves and assert their 'dominance'
Second, upon returning to the lab, participants in all three conditions were told they would later undergo electric shocks as part of a stress test, and were asked how much of a shock they would be willing to receive (between 10 volts and 250 volts)
almost like silent peer pressure
they were given a cover storyCover storyA fake description of the purpose and/or procedure of a study, used when deception is necessary in order to answer a research question. about how their blood sugar levels would be monitored over a series of tasks
This is really smart! That way their answers aren't biased based on what the experiment is testing
Half were from the Southern United States (a culture of honor) and half were from the Northern United States (not a culture of honor
I think that it's interesting how strong this generalization of values is. I get that different regions have different characteristics, but it seems very bold to assume that everyone from the south values/believes one thing, and everyone from the north values/believes another.
“perform better”
subjective
a negative attitude toward mushrooms
this is interesting because I usually think of an attitude as something that you can change. I hear my parents saying "have a better attitude" a lot. However, this implies that you attitude is more or an expression of opinion.
Processes can become automatic through repetition, practice, or repeated associations.
like habits
A behavior or process is considered automatic if it is unintentional, uncontrollable, occurs outside of conscious awareness, or is cognitively efficient
your brain going on auto-pilot
whereby we are skeptical of evidence that goes against what we want to believe despite the strength of the evidence
An example that come to mind is if someone you admired and respected did something that went against your morals or values. you may try to deny that the person did that thing in order to preserve your positive perception of them as a person.
Hot cognition
So is this like when you base your decisions off of your emotions rather than logical reasoning?
Although you’re probably right that you will feel negative (and not positive) emotions, will you be able to accurately estimate how negative you’ll feel? What about how long those negative feelings will last?
This reminds me of thinking you'll "get over something" but it sticks with you
how you will feel if you do poorly on the paper
this kind of encompasses also how much you care about turning in a good paper
which fits the perceiver’s representation of an athlete’s characteristics.
they make a generalization, and if something falls under that generalization it can be put into a certain category
(self-schemas)
I wonder how this works. If a schema is a blueprint of how we expect something or some to behave, then how does this translate to ourselves. Aren't we in control (for the most part) of how we behave?
“go beyond the information given”
make assumptions
perceive
different for everyone
In American society
Is this not the case in other societies?
enjoy high levels of mental health
this is interesting to me because it implies that some people don't want to have high levels of mental health
She seems to be very adept at giving advice about love and relationships, which stems, the teenager now believes, from her early experiences with her mother.
for many people, when your parents get divorced it can be a very traumatizing experience. It is interesting how this text shows how a positive skill can stem from that kind of experience (and sometimes trauma).
Her parents were divorced when she was 5 years old, the teenager recalls, and this caused a great deal of stress in her family.
events like this that happen when children are young can shape the child's identity and perception of themselves as they grow/develop
The self typically becomes an autobiographical author
It is interesting how unaware of this process we seem to be
, the self may be seen as a social actor, who enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others
I think that although it is important to stay true to yourself, being a "social actor" isn't always a bad thing. I think that this could also be interpreted as 'code switching' in different social situations. For example, it is almost necessary that we act differently around our teacher than we do around our friends, or our parents, or our doctors, etc.