eaders can judge for themselves whether the items are sufficiently diverse.
Hmm...we are probably not more qualified than you for this.
eaders can judge for themselves whether the items are sufficiently diverse.
Hmm...we are probably not more qualified than you for this.
pilot-testing
crucial!
the diversity of items should help wash out these differences
curious to hear more about this...balance across all languages is a big ask
Monolinguals (N = 246,497)
over 1/3 of participants
Non-immersion learners (N = 266,701)
over 1/3 of participants
English were Finnish (N = 39,962), Turkish (N = 36,239), German (N = 24,995), Russian (N = 22,834), and Hungarian (N = 22,108)
Personally a little surprised to not see Spanish, with it being a US-origin survey
represents a conspicuous immaturity in the context of language
Really low margin for error in coordination movements as much as in language
Learning ability vs. ultimate attainment
Crucial distinguishment - my project and this involve learning over months and years, not minutes and hours
preserved almost to the crux of adulthood (17.4 years old) and then declines steadily
"critical period" ends at 18ish? but how long to learn...peak performance may decrease well before
second language acquisition
small scope, but not a bad starting point for research
dataset of unprecedented size (669,498 native and non-native English speakers)
huge draw to this paper