In viewing the tabulation, it is clear that the University only had eight original professors, each of which lived in one of the Lawn's ten pavilions; however the numbering of Pavilions does not reflect where professors of the courses lived. The original professors included: Charles G. Bonnycastle - Professor of natural philosophy; Robley Dunglison - Professor of anatomy and medicine; Thomas Hewitt Key - Professor of mathematics; George Long - Professor of ancient languages; George Blaetterman - Professor of modern languages; John Patton Emmet - Professor of natural history; John Tayloe Lomax - Professor of law; George Tucker - Professor of moral philosophy. Note: Despite ten pavilions, there were only 8 original faculty. Where is the discrepancy? http://uvamagazine.org/articles/1825_old_school

Specific consideration given to the phrase "centrality of the white population of the whole state". In deciding benefits of the University's chosen location, it is indicated that the white population's accessibility to the site was of utmost importance, and such that racial bias was a major factor in the original acceptance of students to the University. It would be interesting to research the admittance of ethnicity in the early years of the University. Although a white majority and no blacks are expected of the period, it would be an interesting inquiry to see if any other ethnic groups were accepted, such as Latino, Native American, and non-European decent. In all, the real question is whether the University was 100% white males versus anything less, while still noting the period, but questioning Thomas Jefferson's belief that "every man is created equally" and the trend of ethnic admittance to the University.

The real question is how these lands were decided to be given for University purposes? Did someone contact these owners about their lands to see if they would be willing to be purchased off, were they personally donated by their owners, or were they already on the market? Were the prices raised or lowered depending on their views of Thomas Jefferson?

The Society of the Cincinnati was created by Henry Knox, in May 1783, around the close of the Revolutionary War. The brotherhood aimed to maintain the brotherhood forged between the men who fought and financially support original members; specifically, in providing pensions. The society is long-standing through the passing of membership to the eldest son or a "collateral descendant" (aka nephew, uncle, cousin). Modeling the hierarchy societies in Europe, the Cincinnati Society was criticized for its parallelism to uneven class structure; an antagonizing trait in regards to the new nation's focus on equality among all citizens. In such, Thomas Jefferson wrote to George Washington, the first President General of the society, on April 16, 1784, commenting his own views on the societies values and reputation, then leading up with a four-point structure in which the Society could work to reform its structure and proceedings.