3 Matching Annotations
  1. Jun 2015
    1. Those wondering why electronic literature is relatively unknown in a larger context may want to read the essay, "Electronic Literature: Where Is It?" by Dene Grigar, aimed as a companion to Hayles' essay. It suggests that differences in cognitive patterns between print and electronic works, assumptions of what constitutes the quality of "literariness," and even requirements for tenure and promotion contribute to its lack of presence in the academy. Additionally, Grigar further argues that as video games and other popular culture digital media forms mainstream into the academy, so too will Electronic Literature. Students inculcated from birth by digital media will ultimately be the final arbiters of its popularity and growth. The call to action found at the end of the essay has given rise to this Electronic Literature exhibit at the MLA 2012 Convention.

      This seems a key difference between the definitions. The MLA discussion takes into account social context and differences between US and European definitions. In a way, I like it much more, because it also connects this definition to the larger discourses about "what makes something literary"--and how that is influenced by forces outside the academy, not just within it.

    1. The confrontation with technology at the level of creation is what distinguishes electronic literature from, for example, e-books, digitized versions of print works, and other products of print authors “going digital.”

      This seems a key point--creation, not just dissemination.

    2. Literary performances online that develop new ways of writi

      This seems fairly vague. What kind of performances? What new ways?