46 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2024
    1. That challenge has led the waste industry to push the federal government to recognize their facilities as “passive receivers” of the contamination, which would allow them to avoid responsibility for cleaning up PFAS contamination.

      Another call to Federal Gov.

    2. source reduction efforts upstream of the water treatment facilities to reduce concentrations, successfully reducing PFOS contamination by 85% or more at four of the facilities by 2022. Even so, one other facility that successfully reduced its emissions by 54%

      reduction is viable at least in some capacity

    3. In 2017, PFAS contamination in fish led Kammer and her colleagues to a chrome plating facility that had been discharging a large amount of the chemicals into a river. That discovery led to a statewide investigation, following which Michigan halted the land application of biosolids from six wastewater treatment plants due to high concentrations of PFOS.

      This is only one investigation, how many investigations are there to go.

    4. Executive Director Janine Burke-Wells said total bans short-circuit a system that has been in place for decades. She also said that reaching zero levels of PFAS in biosolids is unrealistic at a time when the chemicals are seemingly being found everywhere.

      Sudden bans never usually work out well as it takes time to figure what to do.

    5. It’s just that we’re looking for it,” Woodbury said. “As soon as other states start looking and doing testing, they’re going to find the same thing that Maine has: that there’s contaminated farmland, that they need to deal with it and it’s going to cost a lot of money.”

      Wonder how many will find out their land is contaminated.

    6. “We live every day with the odors and fumes from the landfill,”

      The public health of another community should not be affected because of legislation.

    7. noted in 2022 testimony that if all of the composted or land-applied sludge in Maine in 2020 were instead sent to Juniper Ridge, it would have constituted roughly 2% of the waste accepted there. The landfill already accepted 64,443 tons of sludge in 2020, far more than was composted in the state, according to DEP data cited in Nichols’ testimony.

      Counter to previous annotation, the capacities issues may have been inevitable anyways.

    8. Juniper Ridge, which received about 90% of the state’s biosolids in 2022, was expected to fill its remaining permitted capacity by 2028.

      What will be the future implications for Maine?

    9. A report submitted to Maine DEP last December painted a stark picture of the state’s capacity to dispose of or remediate contaminated biosolids.

      What could this mean for other states that follow Maine's footsteps?

    10. Within days, the state’s Department of Environmental Protection identified an emergency solution, allowing biosolids from wastewater treatment plants to be shipped up to Canada at significant expense. The legislature also passed an emergency bill, LD 718, later that year. It allowed landfill operators to import out-of-state C&D waste as a bulking material safely landfill the biosolids through July 1, 2025.

      Costs to save the environment. (Complete speculation) Could the EPA be avoiding to properly manage the environment due to costs?

    11. “Bangor has never once gotten a phone call saying, ‘We can’t pick up your biosolids,’” Smith said. “That was a very eye-opening moment. That had never happened before, and it was happening throughout the entire state.”

      After the ban on sludge spreading, Maine has had problems dealing with biosolids as they had nothing to do with it.

    12. EPA to force regulation of PFAS in biosolids.

      Rightfully so especially after Dominique Joseph's statement on sludge not necessarily having risk.

    13. Maine’s ban, LD 1911, was described at the time as the first state law in

      Relating to 3rd source, apparently also first state to ban use of sludge.

    14. a growing number of states have begun considering their own bans on land application or more stringent PFAS

      States began their own bans. How does this reflect the national governments regulatory actions?

    15. PFOA and PFOS, but not others.

      From my second source, there is 4700+ PFAs, what do you mean your risk assessment only checks 2/4700? The risk assessment will not be accurate to the actual risk of biosolids.

    16. “The presence of a pollutant in sewage sludge alone does not necessarily mean that there is risk to [human health] or the environment from its use or disposal,” Dominique Joseph, a senior communications advisor with EPA, said in an emailed statement.

      Sure... what about the presence of thousands of pollutants? Also you cannot claim there's no necessary risk when Maine is an example of what happens with the reuse of sludge.

    1. The 26 deer sampled tested up to 54.3 parts per billion (ppb) for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, or PFOS, one of the most persistent forever chemicals, averaging 20.2 ppb. The 29 turkeys sampled a year later tested up to 139 ppb, averaging 24.07 ppb.

      The average amount in humans for PFOs is 5 pp

    2. Studies of people exposed to PFAS have found links to increased cholesterol levels, decreased response to vaccines, liver inflammation, increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia in pregnant women, and increased risk of certain cancers.

      My second source on PFAs also affects the hormonal system, development and the immune system.

    3. Maine banned sludge spreading in 2021, becoming effective in 2022.

      What states have not banned sludge spreading? Has a similar situation like this happened else where?

    4. blood and organs of game, fish, livestock, and humans.

      This is bioaccumulation something I learned from my first source. (Connection between sources)

    5. harmful chemicals in grass and water near farms that used sewage sludge

      Sewage sludge is the byproduct from waste water treatment facilities (AP Environment Sci Background Knowledge) and composed of well.. sewage.

    6. Fall wild turkey season began in September, depending on the area, and ends Nov. 7.

      How many people could have been affected? This is when turkeys are traditionally enjoyed by Americans.

  2. Oct 2024
    1. ”fluorinated substances that contain at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom (without any H/Cl/Br/I atom attached to it), i.e., with a few noted exceptions (represented by a carbon atom instead having H/Cl/Br/I atoms attached), any chemical with at least a perfluorinated methyl group (−CF3) or a perfluorinated methylene group (−CF2−) is a PFAS” [51].

      Recent, Broader definition of PFAs.

    2. PFAS substances represent a serious concern for human health potentially inducing alterations in the development, lipid metabolism and endocrine system, cancerogenicity, immunotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and reprotoxicity.

      Likelihood of cancer, effects nervous system, hormone production, damages fats in body, and alters development.

    3. List of typical PFAS uses in industrial and consumers products.

      Multiple legitimate uses for PFAs (Biocides, Fire-fighting, Aviation, Household chemicals. Although personal care products such as make up and shampoo shouldn't contain PFAs, nor should products like dental floss and lotions which are used directly on the body.

    4. The exceptional strength of the C-F bond confers very high thermal and chemical stability

      Bond strength explains why PFAs can survive harsh environments and not break down.

    5. PFAS have been detected in the air [33,34], groundwater [35,36], freshwater [17,37], marinewater [38,39], drinking water [40,41] and soil [42,43,44]

      will end up in fish, soil, drinking water, and produce (humans will most likely consume them)

    6. Common features of PFAS are represented by their chemical stability which causes environmental persistence [10], their high mobility which confers them a long-range transport potential [11] causing their pervasive spreading even into remote regions (e.g., the Arctic’s or Antarctic’s)

      Can travel long distances without being broken, and it's persistence allows it to survive in the Arctic and Antarctic

    7. Of note, while the PFAS family has rapidly expanded into an impressive number of more than 4700 different substances including both the “legacy PFAS” (i.e., PFOS, PFOA) and the “emerging PFAS” (e.g., GenX)

      Still being produced, while legacy are more controlled.

    8. evidence indicate that these compounds represent also a serious concern for both wildlife and human health as a result of their ubiquitous distribution, their extreme persistence and their bioaccumulative potential

      PFAs share the same characteristics that microplastics do. It's everywhere, it's hard to break down, and can accumulate in the body.

    1. MNPs accumulate within and affect the proper functioning of the placenta – the vital organ of pregnancy responsible for all maternal-fetal exchange

      MNPs accumulate could affect the infant and the mother, how many microplastics could the child be exposed to?

    2. Observations in both maternal mice and rats exposed to PS-NPs during gestation, ranging in size from 20 to 500nm, demonstrated the presence of these particles in fetal liver (96, 108, 109), heart (96, 109), brain (99, 108, 109), lung (108, 109), and kidney (109). Interestingly, a similar exposure using PE-MPs (10-45µm) resulted in MP accumulation exclusively in fetal kidneys (110). In humans, MNPs have been measured in fetal meconium (36, 46, 47) and amniotic fluid (102), and using an ex vivo human placenta perfusion model, a size dependent transfer of MNPs from the maternal to fetal circulation has been described (111, 112).

      Observed in rats, MNPs are present in the off-spring of rats exposed to MNPs.

    3. However, there remain considerable gaps in understanding that prevent a thorough assessment of whether current MNP exposures contribute to significant human infertility or disease.

      The research isn't there to prove MNPs significantly contribute to infertility.

    4. In rodent models, exposure to phthalates and BPA can induce alterations in DNA methylation patterns (70–73), histone modifications (73, 74), and non-coding RNA expression within the germline. These changes can disrupt normal epigenetic programming during critical windows of spermatogenesis, leading to impaired sperm development, reduced sperm quality, and compromised fertility

      Phthalates and BPA were other chemicals I want to research.

    5. elated to cellular growth and development, coupled to poor sperm quality and fertility outcomes

      In humans, may effect cellular growth, sperm quality and fertility outcomes.

    6. distinct changes in reproductive hormone signalling are observed, with reductions in the circulating concentrations of estradiol (E2) and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), and increased concentrations of LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and testosterone

      Changes in reproductive hormones

    7. in rodent models leads to reduced sperm quantity and quality (51–54, 57, 59, 61, 64, 65) in addition to reduced testicular androgen production (57) and circulating levels of testosterone

      in rats, male fertilitary has been affects and hormones reduced.

    8. MNPs have been found in a diverse range of biological samples, including blood (30, 31), urine (32), sputum (33), feces (34, 35), and breast milk (36, 37). Further, MNP accumulation has been identified in numerous organ systems including lung (38–43), colon and spleen (44)

      MNPs are present in many parts of the body

    9. MNPs can cross the physiological barriers of the lungs, gut, and skin

      MNPs are small enough to cross barriers of the lungs, gut, and skin bypassing regulatory organs to process the chemicals

    10. There is concern that chemicals contained within MNPs, or those absorbed to their surface, can be carried into the human body and released into various tissue beds (24). In this way, MNPs act as a vehicle for toxic exposure to a number of xenobiotics, which may bypass typical physiological defences such as drug-metabolizing enzymes in the gut and liver and induce direct effects to the cells/tissues surrounding the internalized MNPs (25).

      MNPs can expose people to xenobiotics by bypassing the gut, liver, and effect surrounding cells.

    11. A recent review estimated that over 10,000 unique chemicals are used at various stages in plastics manufacturing, of which roughly 2,400 have been identified as chemicals of regulatory concern (22).

      In plastic manufacturing, 2400 out of 10000 chemicals of regulatory concern.

    12. However, polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene are the three most common occurring polymers (5), being found in a countless number of household and personal care products (9, 10), cosmetic products (11), toothpaste (10, 12, 13) and plastic food containers (14).

      MNPs vary in chemicals, shapes, and are found in household, personal care, plastic food containers and cosmetic products.

    13. Microplastics are omnipresent in our environment, being found in large quantities in oceans, rivers, ground water, sediments and soil environments, sewage, and even the air we breathe

      MPs result from the breakdown of larger plastics. not only are MPs everywhere, they're resistant to biodegradation.

    14. microplastic accumulation was observed in the human placenta, raising important questions related to the biological effects of these contaminants on the health of pregnancies and offspring

      microplastic dangerous to pregnant women and infants