15 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
    1. We must come back to the good old doctrine of our fore fathers who declared to the world, “this self evident truth that all men are created equal, and that they have certain inalienable rights among which are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

      Duh! Even economics, the ultimate reason for keeping the institution of slavery, does not excuse the practitioners from their bigotry. But Angelina, the forefathers themselves who created the founding documents were blinded to this horrible practice. I can relate because I had servants growing up. Now they were not slaves and could leave anytime they wanted, or run away with no untoward consequences (often they did, along with certain of our prized possessions). However, for someone who grew up in modern-day America, it will still be a barbarous practice. I agree to theirs and Angelina's point of view but to me as a kid, having servants was perfectly normal.

    2. ye could bear with me a little in my folly, and indeed bear with me,

      Classic follow-up to classic introduction in the art of persuasion, or suasion, "you don't know me and think I'm stupid but listen anyway, you might find something worthwhile - for it is you I'm trying to help."

    3. I ask you now, for the sake of former confidence and former friendship

      Classic introduction to pushing a point, "you know me and my quality, have faith in me enough to hear me."

    4. armour of righteousness upon the right hand and on the left

      This starts to give me visions of raised hands, the call sign for revolution! What happened to solemn calmness? I guess one cannot help feeling passion if one truly believes.

    5. as a matter of morals and religion

      I understand the high emphasis everybody placed in faith and religion during that time, but should morals really be dependent on religion? I know of several persons who claim religion and priests too, who be very immoral indeed.

    6. If then, we have no right to enslave an African, surely we can have none to enslave an American

      I think the argument is more effective the other way around. If we have no right to enslave an American, then we should have no right to enslave an African - or any other human being, for that matter.

    1. as the Saviour had been baptised so should we be also—and when the white people would not let us be baptised by the church, we went down into the water together

      As I have said in Unit 1, Europeans teach Africans and Native Americans the "word of God" and unanticipated by them, some of these converts find the words of revolution and the spirit to throw away their yoke. They develop their own prophets who will lead them to the promised land and like Joshua will smite anyone standing in their way. Hey! I still remember some parts of the bible.

    2. communion of the Spirit whose revelations I often communicated to them

      Mix a people in agony and a strong belief in the All Mighty (whatever form the culture may give it), and someone is bound to claim "communion with the Spirit:" the Father, the Son, or the Great Eagle. The path to comfort, to a better life, is synonymous with redemption in the spirit, a great awakening to the meaning of life.

    3. that I had too much sense to be raised, and if I was, I would never be of any use to any one as a slave

      I heard this before when I was a child, not said to me, but to our servants. Older servants would tell them this if they were being too "rebellious" and wanting to question everything about their work. I always understood it as "being a smartass." However, in lieu of Nat Turner's setting, I see someone who was of more average intelligence and able to question the norms in his life, someone unafraid of finding the truth.

    1. And now you have an extraordinary opportunity, a day wherein Christ has flung the door of mercy wide open, and stands in the door calling and crying with a loud voice to poor sinners; a day wherein many are flocking to him, and pressing into the kingdom of God;

      Third step in the religious conversion game, the Lord God is merciful after all, come join our movement. This was the same rhetoric for the born agains in the 1980s. Why the heck did you have to scare us in the first place? Now we are pissed and will not join you just for spite.

    2. Haste and escape for your lives

      This was Edward's solution, escape to the arms of his movement. This is where he diverges from the Catholic way, the Catholic priests would be asking for donations at the end. Give to save your soul!

    3. If we knew that there was one person, and but one, in the whole congregation that was to be the subject of this misery, what an awful thing would it be to think of! If we knew who it was, what an awful sight would it be to see such a person!

      Second step for religious conversion, guilt trip. You are not worth it, you are a sinner, repent! This still baffles me, that there be a huge mass of people who were insecure enough in the early 18th century to fall for this.

    4. But this is the dismal case of every soul in this congregation, that has not been born again

      Born again? We were all physically born, then those who are Christians got baptized (i.e., born again), now he wants us to be born again? How many times do you need to be born? From the context of the time period, Edwards probably meant to be born again and be free from the teachings of the Puritan theocrats. I remember the born again movement of the 1980s, same banana.

    5. The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect, over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked; his wrath towards you burns like fire

      Still more scare tactic.

    6. There is the dreadful pit of the glowing flames of the wrath of God; there is hell’s wide gaping mouth open; and you have nothing to stand upon, nor anything to take hold of: there is nothing between you and hell but the air; ’tis only the power and mere pleasure of God that holds you up.

      The first step in converting people to your religion, scare tactic. Given the very strong belief in God during the early 18th century, it is amazing how they fell for this. I do understand, however. I was raised a strict Catholic and we were subjected to the same thing, believe in God or you will burn in the fires of hell!